Vaginal dysbiosis - the association with reproductive outcomes in IVF patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.


Journal

Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology
ISSN: 1473-656X
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007264

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 4 2024
pubmed: 10 4 2024
entrez: 10 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To examine impact of vaginal dysbiosis (VD), including bacterial vaginosis (BV) and aerobic vaginitis (AV) on reproductive outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) patients. BV-bacteria (e.g. Gardnerella) and AV-bacteria (e.g. Streptococci and Enterococci) have been identified in the endometrium. However, there is inconclusive evidence whether IVF patients with VD have lower success rates. The present systematic review and meta-analysis of PubMed/Medline, until December 2023 included 25 studies, involving 6835 IVF patients. Overall VD was defined as an approximation of community state type IV, including BV and AV-type dysbiosis based on either molecular or microscopy methods. Outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), early pregnancy loss (EPL), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR).Vaginal dysbiosis prevalence was 19% [1271/6835, 95% confidence interval (CI) 18-20%]. Six studies examined AV-type dysbiosis with a prevalence of 4% (26/628, 95% CI 3-6%). Vaginal dysbiosis correlates with a higher EPL [relative risk (RR) = 1.49, 95% CI 1.15-1.94] and lower CPR (RR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.70-0.95). No statistically significant impact of VD, BV, or AV was found on LBR and BPR.Thus, the association between VD and reproductive outcome remains puzzling as it is difficult to explain how VD impacts CPR and EPL but not LBR and BPR.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38597377
doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000953
pii: 00001703-990000000-00124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

Skafte-Holm A, Humaidan P, Bernabeu A, et al. The association between vaginal dysbiosis and reproductive outcomes in sub-fertile women undergoing IVF-treatment: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis. Pathogens 2021; 10:295.
Coudray MS, Madhivanan P. Bacterial vaginosis—a brief synopsis of the literature. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 245:143–148.
Klebanoff MA, Schwebke JR, Zhang J, et al. Vulvovaginal symptoms in women with bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104:267–272.
Bernabeu A, Lledo B, Diaz MC, et al. Effect of the vaginal microbiome on the pregnancy rate in women receiving assisted reproductive treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2111–2119.
Bracewell-Milnes T, Saso S, Nikolaou D, et al. Investigating the effect of an abnormal cervico-vaginal and endometrial microbiome on assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review. Am J Reprod Immunol 2018; 80:e13037.
Haahr T, Jensen JS, Humaidan P. Vaginal microbiota and IVF outcomes: poor diagnosis results in flawed conclusions. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:178.
Sherrard J, Wilson J, Donders G, et al. 2023 update to 2018 European (IUSTI/WHO) guideline on the management of vaginal discharge. Int J STD AIDS 2023; 34:745.
Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, et al. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 1983; 74:14–22.
Nugent RP, Krohn MA, Hillier SL. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:297–301.
García-Velasco JA, Menabrito M, Catalán IB. What fertility specialists should know about the vaginal microbiome: a review. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35:103–112.
France MT, Ma B, Gajer P, et al. VALENCIA: a nearest centroid classification method for vaginal microbial communities based on composition. Microbiome 2020; 8:166.
Kaambo E, Africa C, Chambuso R, Passmore JS. Vaginal microbiomes associated with aerobic vaginitis and bacterial vaginosis. Front Public Health 2018; 6:78.
Donders GGG, Bellen G, Grinceviciene S, et al. Aerobic vaginitis: no longer a stranger. Res Microbiol 2017; 168:845–858.
Haahr T, Zacho J, Brauner M, et al. Reproductive outcome of patients undergoing in vitro fertilisation treatment and diagnosed with bacterial vaginosis or abnormal vaginal microbiota: a systematic PRISMA review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2019; 126:200–207.
Ji L, Peng C, Bao X. Effect of vaginal flora on clinical outcome of frozen embryo transfer. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12:987292.
Koort K, Sosa K, Turk S, et al. Lactobacillus crispatus-dominated vaginal microbiome and Acinetobacter-dominated seminal microbiome support beneficial ART outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102:921–934.
van den Tweel MM, van den Munckhof EHA, van der Zanden M, et al. Bacterial vaginosis in a subfertile population undergoing fertility treatments: a prospective cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 41:441–450.
Wells Gas B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf.
Eskew AM, Stout MJ, Bedrick BS, et al. Association of vaginal bacterial communities and reproductive outcomes with prophylactic antibiotic exposure in a subfertile population undergoing in vitro fertilization: a prospective exploratory study. F S Sci 2021; 2:71–79.
Karaer A, Dogan B, Gunal S, et al. The vaginal microbiota composition of women undergoing assisted reproduction: a prospective cohort study. BJOG 2021; 128:2101–2109.
Vieira-Baptista P, Silva-Soares S, Lyra J, et al. Wet mount microscopy of the vaginal milieu does not predict the outcome of fertility treatments: a cross-sectional study. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2022; 26:176–180.
Väinämö S, Saqib S, Kalliala I, et al. Longitudinal analysis of vaginal microbiota during IVF fresh embryo transfer and in early pregnancy. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0165023.
Zeng H, He D, Hu L, et al. Non-Lactobacillus dominance of the vagina is associated with reduced live birth rate following IVF/ICSI: a propensity score-matched cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 305:519–528.
Holger Schünemann JB, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE handbook. Available at: https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html [Accessed 20 January 2021].
Mangot-Bertrand J, Fenollar F, Bretelle F, et al. Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: impact on IVF outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2013; 32:535–541.
Haahr T, Jensen JS, Thomsen L, et al. Abnormal vaginal microbiota may be associated with poor reproductive outcomes: a prospective study in IVF patients. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:795–803.
Moragianni D, Dryllis G, Andromidas P, et al. Genital tract infection and associated factors affect the reproductive outcome in fertile females and females undergoing in vitro fertilization. Biomed Rep 2019; 10:231–237.
The Nordic Cochrane Centre. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program]; Version 5.3. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Cochrane Centre; 2014.
Hamdoun M, Braham M, Kacem K, et al. Does bacterial colonization during embryo transfer have an impact on pregnancy rate in ICSI?: Tunisian preliminary results. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2021; 50:101727.
Saxtorph MH, Hallager T, Persson G, et al. Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:998–1006.
Jain M, Mladova E, Dobychina A, et al. Comparison of microbial profiles and viral status along the vagina-cervix-endometrium continuum of infertile patients. Syst Biol Reprod Med 2023; 69:310–319.
Lledo B, Fuentes A, Lozano FM, et al. Identification of vaginal microbiome associated with IVF pregnancy. Sci Rep 2022; 12:6807.
Tong Y, Sun Q, Shao X, Wang Z. Effect of vaginal microbiota on pregnancy outcomes of women from Northern China who conceived after IVF. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1200002.
Lüth T, Graspeuntner S, Neumann K, et al. Improving analysis of the vaginal microbiota of women undergoing assisted reproduction using nanopore sequencing. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2659–2667.
van den Tweel MM, van der Struijs S, van den Munckhof EHA, Boers KE. The relationship between vaginal pH and bacterial vaginosis as diagnosed using qPCR in an asymptomatic subfertile population. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:1787–1793.
Farooq Faisal S, Adnan Abdul Hameed W, Alwasiti E. The influence of vaginal dysbiosis on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. Arch Razi Inst 2023; 78:227–232.
Jepsen IE, Saxtorph MH, Englund ALM, et al. Probiotic treatment with specific lactobacilli does not improve an unfavorable vaginal microbiota prior to fertility treatment—a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1057022.
Tanha FD, Rahmani Z, Rezaei Z, et al. The effect of normalizing vaginal microbiome using Lactovag in improving pregnancy outcomes in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 308:1587–1592.
Thanaboonyawat I, Pothisan S, Petyim S, Laokirkkiat P. Pregnancy outcomes after vaginal probiotic supplementation before frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:11892.
Diaz-Martínez MDC, Bernabeu A, Lledó B, et al. Impact of the vaginal and endometrial microbiome pattern on assisted reproduction outcomes. J Clin Med 2021; 10:4063.
Evans GE, Mahajan V, Wakeman S, et al. A pilot study using unique targeted testing of the urogenital microbiome has potential as a predictive test during IVF for implantation outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307:1957–1967.
Vajpeyee M, Tiwari S, Yadav LB, Tank P. Assessment of bacterial diversity associated with assisted reproductive technologies through next-generation sequencing. Middle East Fertil Soc J 2022; 27:28.
Kong Y, Liu Z, Shang Q, et al. The disordered vaginal microbiota is a potential indicator for a higher failure of in vitro fertilization. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:217.
Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD. Influence of bacterial vaginosis on conception and miscarriage in the first trimester: cohort study. BMJ 1999; 319:220–223.
Selim SA, El Alfy SM, Aziz MH, et al. Effective of metronidazole to bacterial flora in vagina and the impact of microbes on live birth rate during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Arch Gynecol Obstet 2011; 284:1449–1453.
Eckert LO, Moore DE, Patton DL, et al. Relationship of vaginal bacteria and inflammation with conception and early pregnancy loss following in-vitro fertilization. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2003; 11:11–17.
Liversedge NH, Turner A, Horner PJ, et al. The influence of bacterial vaginosis on in-vitro fertilization and embryo implantation during assisted reproduction treatment. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2411–2415.
Gaudoin M, Rekha P, Morris A, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and past chlamydial infection are strongly and independently associated with tubal infertility but do not affect in vitro fertilization success rates. Fertil Steril 1999; 72:730–732.
Boomsma CM, Kavelaars A, Bozkurt N, et al. Is bacterial vaginosis associated with a pro-inflammatory cytokine profile in endometrial secretions of women undergoing IVF? Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21:133–141.
Eldivan O, Evliyaoglu O, Ersoy E, et al. Does screening for vaginal infection have an impact on pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles? Turk J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 13:11–15.
Moini A, Mohammadi Yeganeh L, Shiva M, et al. Bacterial vaginosis and the risk of early miscarriage in women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a prospective cohort study. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2018; 21:263–268.
Moore DE, Soules MR, Klein NA, et al. Bacteria in the transfer catheter tip influence the live-birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:1118–1124.
Spandorfer SD, Neuer A, Giraldo PC, et al. Relationship of abnormal vaginal flora, proinflammatory cytokines and idiopathic infertility in women undergoing IVF. J Reprod Med 2001; 46:806–810.
Koedooder R, Singer M, Schoenmakers S, et al. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1042–1054.
Kyono K, Hashimoto T, Nagai Y, Sakuraba Y. Analysis of endometrial microbiota by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing among infertile patients: a single-center pilot study. Reprod Med Biol 2018; 17:297–306.
Vergaro P, Tiscornia G, Barragan M, et al. Vaginal microbiota profile at the time of embryo transfer does not affect live birth rate in IVF cycles with donated oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 38:883–891.
van Oostrum N, De Sutter P, Meys J, Verstraelen H. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28:1809–1815.
Singer M, Borg M, Ouburg S, Morre SA. The relation of the vaginal microbiota to early pregnancy development during in vitro fertilization treatment—a meta-analysis. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019; 48:223–229.
Hyman RW, Herndon CN, Jiang H, et al. The dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during infertility therapy with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012; 29:105–115.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6:e1000097.

Auteurs

Milica Maksimovic Celicanin (M)

The Fertility Clinic, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.

Thor Haahr (T)

The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital Skive, Denmark.

Peter Humaidan (P)

The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital Skive, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

Axel Skafte-Holm (A)

Department of Bacteria, Parasites and Fungi, Research Unit for Reproductive Microbiology, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH