COVID-19 Vaccine decision-making: trust among the transgender and disability communities in India.

COVID-19 vaccines Trust community-based participatory research disabled persons gender equity transgender persons

Journal

Journal of communication in healthcare
ISSN: 1753-8076
Titre abrégé: J Commun Healthc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101489047

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 4 2024
pubmed: 10 4 2024
entrez: 10 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Historical marginalisation and ongoing trust deficits in health and government systems shape present-day vaccine perceptions among marginalised communities. This paper sought to understand the role of trust in decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the transgender and disability communities in India. Using a participatory approach we interviewed 24 community representatives, identifying themselves as transgender individuals or as persons with disability, and 21 key informants such as vaccine programme managers, vaccine providers, and community advocates. We undertook an inductive thematic analysis of the data using a socio-ecological model. Fear of side effects in relation to specific needs of the two communities and mistrust of systems involved in vaccination shaped four different pathways for vaccine decision-making. Mistrust of systems was influenced by past negative experiences with the health system, creating contexts in which information and misinformation are shared and interpreted. Participants negotiated their doubts about safety and mistrust of systems by interacting with different sources of influence showing patterns of decision-making that are dynamic, context-dependent, and intersectional. These findings will help in determining the content, strategies and approaches to equitable vaccine communication for these two communities. The two communities ought to be included in vaccine trials. Vaccine information must respond to the specific needs of these two communities which could be enabled by collaboration and engagement with community members and influencers. Finally, long-term investment towards the needs of marginalised communities is vital to dismantle cycles of marginalisation and distrust and in turn improve vaccine acceptance and uptake.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
Historical marginalisation and ongoing trust deficits in health and government systems shape present-day vaccine perceptions among marginalised communities. This paper sought to understand the role of trust in decision-making about COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the transgender and disability communities in India.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
Using a participatory approach we interviewed 24 community representatives, identifying themselves as transgender individuals or as persons with disability, and 21 key informants such as vaccine programme managers, vaccine providers, and community advocates. We undertook an inductive thematic analysis of the data using a socio-ecological model.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Fear of side effects in relation to specific needs of the two communities and mistrust of systems involved in vaccination shaped four different pathways for vaccine decision-making. Mistrust of systems was influenced by past negative experiences with the health system, creating contexts in which information and misinformation are shared and interpreted. Participants negotiated their doubts about safety and mistrust of systems by interacting with different sources of influence showing patterns of decision-making that are dynamic, context-dependent, and intersectional.
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
These findings will help in determining the content, strategies and approaches to equitable vaccine communication for these two communities. The two communities ought to be included in vaccine trials. Vaccine information must respond to the specific needs of these two communities which could be enabled by collaboration and engagement with community members and influencers. Finally, long-term investment towards the needs of marginalised communities is vital to dismantle cycles of marginalisation and distrust and in turn improve vaccine acceptance and uptake.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38597810
doi: 10.1080/17538068.2024.2335784
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-10

Auteurs

Sharin D'souza (S)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Bhakti Ghatole (B)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Harikeerthan Raghuram (H)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Sana Parakh (S)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Deepak Tugnawat (D)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Aqsa Shaikh (A)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.
Department of Community Medicine, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India.

Satendra Singh (S)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.
Department of Physiology, University College of Medical Sciences, Delhi, India.

Sunita Sheel Bandewar (SS)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.
Forum for Medical Ethics Society, Mumbai, India.
Vidhayak Trust, Pune, India.

Anant Bhan (A)

Initiative for Health Equity Advocacy and Research, Bhopal Hub, Sangath, Bhopal, India.

Classifications MeSH