Willingness of Pharmacists to Prescribe Medication Abortion in California.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 10 4 2024
pubmed: 10 4 2024
entrez: 10 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Nearly half of US states have restricted abortion access. Policy makers are exploring pathways to increase access to abortion and reproductive health care more broadly. Since 2016, California pharmacists could prescribe hormonal birth control, providing an opportunity to learn about the implementation of pharmacist-provided reproductive health care. To explore the feasibility of broadening pharmacist scope of practice to include prescribing medication abortion. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted from October 11 to December 20, 2022, among a convenience sample of California licensed community pharmacists to examine their attitudes toward, knowledge of, and confidence in prescribing hormonal birth control and reports of pharmacy-level practices. Descriptive analyses and log-binomial regression models were used to compare medication abortion and contraceptive provision attitudes by pharmacist and pharmacy characteristics. Among the 316 pharmacists included in the analysis who worked at community pharmacies across California (mean [SD] age, 40.9 [12.0] years; 169 of 285 [59.3%] cisgender women; and 159 of 272 [58.5%] non-Hispanic Asian individuals), most (193 of 280 [68.9%]) indicated willingness to prescribe medication abortion to pharmacy clients if allowed by law. However, less than half were confident in their knowledge of medication abortion (139 of 288 [48.3%]) or their ability to prescribe it (115 of 285 [40.4%]). Pharmacists who indicated that providing access to hormonal birth control as a prescribing provider was important (263 of 289 [91.0%]) and were confident in their ability to prescribe it (207 of 290 [71.4%]) were 3.96 (95% CI, 1.80-8.73) times and 2.44 (95% CI, 1.56-3.82) times more likely to be willing to prescribe medication abortion and to express confidence in doing so, respectively. Although most pharmacists held favorable attitudes toward hormonal birth control, less than half (144 of 308 [46.8%]) worked in a pharmacy that provided prescriptions for hormonal birth control, and 149 who did not reported barriers such as lack of knowledge or training (65 [43.6%]), insufficient staff or time to add new services (58 [38.9%]), and lack of coverage for services (50 [33.6%]). The findings of this cross-sectional survey study of California pharmacists suggest that most pharmacists were willing to prescribe medication abortion. However, future efforts to expand pharmacists' scope of practice should include training to increase knowledge and confidence in prescribing medication abortion. Pharmacy-level barriers to hormonal birth control prescription, such as insurance coverage for pharmacist effort, should also be addressed, as they may serve as barriers to medication abortion access.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38598235
pii: 2817351
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.6018
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e246018

Auteurs

Cathren Cohen (C)

Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) School of Law.

Lauren A Hunter (LA)

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Raiza M Beltran (RM)

Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA.
Now with School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Jaclyn Serpico (J)

Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) School of Law.

Laura Packel (L)

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.
Now with Malkia Klabu Program, University of California, San Francisco.

Ayako Miyashita Ochoa (AM)

Luskin School of Public Affairs, UCLA.

Sandra I McCoy (SI)

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley.

Kerith J Conron (KJ)

Center on Reproductive Health, Law, and Policy, UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) School of Law.
Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law.

Classifications MeSH