Predictive Factors Influencing the Evolution of Acquired Vitelliform Lesions in Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Eyes.


Journal

Ophthalmology. Retina
ISSN: 2468-6530
Titre abrégé: Ophthalmol Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101695048

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 27 02 2024
revised: 01 04 2024
accepted: 02 04 2024
medline: 11 4 2024
pubmed: 11 4 2024
entrez: 10 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

In this study, we identify risk factors that predict the progression of AVL lesions over time. Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: 163 eyes of 132 patients with a diagnosis of iAMD with AVL METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated consecutive eyes with AMD from a retina clinic population and included 1181 patients and 2362 eyes. After excluding cases with associated geographic atrophy, macular neovascularization (MNV), vitreomacular traction, and those with less than two years of follow-up data, the final analysis cohort consisted of 163 eyes (132 patients) with at least one AVL lesion. The first available visit in which an AVL lesion was evident was considered the baseline visit, and follow-up data was collected from a visit 2years (+/- 3 months) later. Progression outcomes at the follow visit were classified into six categories: Resorbed, Collapsed, MNV, Stable, Increasing, and Decreasing. Subsequently, we analyzed the baseline characteristics for each category and calculated odds ratios to predict these various outcomes. The study focused on identifying predictive factors influencing the evolution of AVL in iAMD eyes. In total, 163 eyes with AVL had follow-up data at 2 years. The collapsed group demonstrated a significantly greater baseline AVL height and width compared to other groups (P < 0.001). With regards to qualitative parameters, subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDD) and intra-retinal hyper-reflective foci (IHRF) at the eye level, AVL located over drusen, and IHRF and ELM disruption over AVL were significantly more prevalent in the collapsed group compared to other groups (P< 0.05 for all comparisons). Odds Ratio for progressing to atrophy after 2 years of follow-up, compared to the resorbed group, were significant for SDD (OR = 2.82, P = 0.048) and AVL height (OR = 1.016, P = 0.006). The presence of SDD and greater AVL height significantly increases the risk of developing atrophy at the location of AVL after 2 years of follow-up. These findings may be of value in risk prognostication and defining patient populations for inclusion in future early intervention trials aimed at preventing progression to atrophy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38599379
pii: S2468-6530(24)00177-5
doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.04.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Alireza Mahmoudi (A)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Sophiana Lindenberg (S)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Giulia Corradetti (G)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Mehdi Emamverdi (M)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Deniz Oncel (D)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Damla Oncel (D)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Jiwon Baek (J)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Alireza Farahani (A)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Louay Almidani (L)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Ye He (Y)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Rouzbeh Abbasgholizadeh (R)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Stanley M Saju (SM)

Retina Consultants of Texas, Retina Consultants of America, Houston, Texas.

Won Ki Lee (WK)

Nune eye hospital, Seoul, Republic of south Korea.

Charles C Wykoff (CC)

Nune eye hospital, Seoul, Republic of south Korea.

David Sarraf (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

K Bailey Freund (KB)

Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York, New York, NY; NYU Grossman School of Medicine,Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York.

Srinivas R Sadda (SR)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: ssadda@doheny.org.

Classifications MeSH