Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with tissue expander entirely covered by acellular dermal matrix: feasibility, safety and histological features resulting from the first 64 procedures.

ADM-wrapped tissue expander (ADM-wrapped TE) Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR) acellular dermal matrix (ADM) tissue regeneration

Journal

Gland surgery
ISSN: 2227-684X
Titre abrégé: Gland Surg
Pays: China (Republic : 1949- )
ID NLM: 101606638

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 26 10 2023
accepted: 20 01 2024
medline: 11 4 2024
pubmed: 11 4 2024
entrez: 11 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Reconstructive options that can be used following conservative mastectomy, skin-, nipple-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies, allow a remarkable variety of safe methods to restore the natural shape and aesthetics of the breast mound. In case of two-stage breast reconstruction, tissue expanders (TEs) are usually placed in a subpectoral position. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of two-step reconstruction with TE in pre-pectoral position covered by acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Between March 2021 and May 2023, at the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, 55 patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations or early breast cancer underwent conservative mastectomy with immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction using TE covered with ADM, followed by a second surgery with replacement of the expander with definitive prosthesis. Demographic, oncological, and histological data along with surgical complications were recorded. A total of 64 conservative mastectomies were performed. In 2 patients (3.1%) complications were found that required reintervention and, in both cases, the TE had to be removed. Two patients developed hematoma and one patient developed seroma. Two patients showed wound dehiscence, both healed after conservative treatment and without implant exposure. No case of necrosis of the skin or nipple-areola complex has been observed, neither of capsular contracture. Capsule formed around TE was populated with cells and blood vessels and showed a thin area of synovial metaplasia. In selected cases it may be more cautious to perform a two-stage breast reconstruction after radical breast surgery by means of TEs. The placement of TEs in pre-pectoral position combines the excellent aesthetic and functional results of the pre-pectoral philosophy with a quite safer and more prudent two-step approach. Our experience reports optimistic results: the ADM covering the TE is seen successfully integrating during tissue expansion and becoming a vascularised new self-tissue. Complications rates are low and such ADM-assisted two-stage pre-pectoral reconstructive technique is a safe, practical, and reproducible method.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Reconstructive options that can be used following conservative mastectomy, skin-, nipple-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies, allow a remarkable variety of safe methods to restore the natural shape and aesthetics of the breast mound. In case of two-stage breast reconstruction, tissue expanders (TEs) are usually placed in a subpectoral position. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of two-step reconstruction with TE in pre-pectoral position covered by acellular dermal matrix (ADM).
Methods UNASSIGNED
Between March 2021 and May 2023, at the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, 55 patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations or early breast cancer underwent conservative mastectomy with immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction using TE covered with ADM, followed by a second surgery with replacement of the expander with definitive prosthesis. Demographic, oncological, and histological data along with surgical complications were recorded.
Results UNASSIGNED
A total of 64 conservative mastectomies were performed. In 2 patients (3.1%) complications were found that required reintervention and, in both cases, the TE had to be removed. Two patients developed hematoma and one patient developed seroma. Two patients showed wound dehiscence, both healed after conservative treatment and without implant exposure. No case of necrosis of the skin or nipple-areola complex has been observed, neither of capsular contracture. Capsule formed around TE was populated with cells and blood vessels and showed a thin area of synovial metaplasia.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
In selected cases it may be more cautious to perform a two-stage breast reconstruction after radical breast surgery by means of TEs. The placement of TEs in pre-pectoral position combines the excellent aesthetic and functional results of the pre-pectoral philosophy with a quite safer and more prudent two-step approach. Our experience reports optimistic results: the ADM covering the TE is seen successfully integrating during tissue expansion and becoming a vascularised new self-tissue. Complications rates are low and such ADM-assisted two-stage pre-pectoral reconstructive technique is a safe, practical, and reproducible method.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38601291
doi: 10.21037/gs-23-432
pii: gs-13-03-297
pmc: PMC11002490
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

297-306

Informations de copyright

2024 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-23-432/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Marco Bernini (M)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giacomo Gigliucci (G)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Dario Cassetti (D)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Cinzia Tommasi (C)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Ilaria Gaggelli (I)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Lorenzo Arlia (L)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Carlotta Becherini (C)

Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Viola Salvestrini (V)

Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Luca Visani (L)

Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Jacopo Nori Cucchiari (J)

Diagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Diego De Benedetto (D)

Diagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Federica Di Naro (F)

Diagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Giulia Bicchierai (G)

Diagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Chiara Bellini (C)

Diagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Simonetta Bianchi (S)

Pathology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Lorenzo Orzalesi (L)

Breast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Lorenzo Livi (L)

Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Icro Meattini (I)

Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.

Classifications MeSH