Numerical study of osteophyte effects on preoperative knee functionality in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty.

musculoskeletal modeling osteophytes preosteophytic bones total knee arthroplasty

Journal

Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
ISSN: 1554-527X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8404726

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 20 02 2024
received: 19 12 2022
accepted: 30 03 2024
medline: 11 4 2024
pubmed: 11 4 2024
entrez: 11 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Osteophytes are routinely removed during total knee arthroplasty, yet the preoperative planning currently relies on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of the patient's osteoarthritic knee, typically including osteophytic features. This complicates the surgeon's ability to anticipate the exact biomechanical effects of osteophytes and the consequences of their removal before the operation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of osteophytes on ligament strains and kinematics, and ascertain whether the osteophyte volume and location determine the extent of this effect. We segmented preoperative CT scans of 21 patients, featuring different osteophyte severity, using image-based active appearance models trained to identify the osteophytic and preosteophytic bone geometries and estimate the cartilage thickness in the segmented surfaces. The patients' morphologies were used to scale a template musculoskeletal knee model. Osteophytes induced clinically relevant changes to the knee's functional behavior, but these were variable and patient-specific. Generally, severe osteophytic knees significantly strained the oblique popliteal ligament (OPL) and posterior capsule (PC) relative to the preosteophytic state. Furthermore, there was a marked effect on the lateral collateral ligament and anterolateral ligament (ALL) strains compared to mild and moderate osteophytic knees, and concurrent alterations in the tibial lateral-medial translation and external-internal rotation. We found a strong correlation between the OPL, PC, and ALL strains and posterolateral condylar and tibial osteophytes, respectively. Our findings may have implications for the preoperative planning in total knee arthroplasty, toward reproducing the physiological knee biomechanics as close as feasibly possible.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38602446
doi: 10.1002/jor.25850
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Stryker European Operations Ltd., Ireland

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.

Références

Tozawa R, Ogawa Y, Minamoto Y, et al. Possible role of MRI‐detected osteophytes as a predictive biomarker for development of osteoarthritis of the knee: a study using data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage Open. 2021;3:100200.
van der Kraan PM, van den Berg WB. Osteophytes: relevance and biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007;15:237‐244.
Rabelo GD, vom Scheidt A, Klebig F, et al. Multiscale bone quality analysis in osteoarthritic knee joints reveal a role of the mechanosensory osteocyte network in osteophytes. Sci Rep. 2020;10:673.
Dayal N, Chang A, Dunlop D, et al. The natural history of anteroposterior laxity and its role in knee osteoarthritis progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2343‐2349.
Wong SHJ, Chiu KY, Yan CH. Review article: osteophytes. J Orthop Surg. 2016;24:403‐410.
Markhardt BK, Li G, Kijowski R. The clinical significance of osteophytes in compartments of the knee joint with normal articular cartilage. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:W164‐W171.
Holst DC, Dennis DA. Pearls: early removal of posterior osteophytes in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:684‐686.
Felson DT. Osteophytes and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2005;44:100‐104.
Yagishita K, Muneta T, Ikeda H. Step‐by‐step measurements of soft tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty for patients with varus knees. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:313‐320.
Motesharei A, Batailler C, De Massari D, Vincent G, Chen AF, Lustig S. Predicting robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty operating time: benefits of machine‐learning and 3D patient‐specific data. Bone Joint Open. 2022;3:383‐389.
Vincent G, Wolstenholme C, Scott I, Bowes M. Fully automatic segmentation of the knee joint using active appearance models. Med Image Anal. 2010;1:224‐230.
Bowes MA, Kacena K, Alabas OA, et al. Machine‐learning, MRI bone shape and important clinical outcomes in osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:502‐508.
Marra MA, Vanheule V, Fluit R, et al. A subject‐specific musculoskeletal modeling framework to predict in vivo mechanics of total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech Eng. 2015;137:1‐12.
Oussedik S, Scholes C, Ferguson D, Roe J, Parker D. Is femoral component rotation in a TKA reliably guided by the functional flexion axis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012;470:3227‐3232.
Skipper Andersen M, De Zee M, Damsgaard M, Nolte D, Rasmussen J. Introduction to force‐dependent kinematics: theory and application to mandible modeling. J Biomech Eng. 2017;139:091001.
Rowe PJ, Myles CM, Walker C, Nutton R. Knee joint kinematics in gait and other functional activities measured using flexible electrogoniometry: how much knee motion is sufficient for normal daily life? Gait Posture. 2000;12:143‐155.
Thelen DG, Won Choi K, Schmitz AM. Co‐simulation of neuromuscular dynamics and knee mechanics during human walking. J Biomech Eng. 2014;136:021033.
Carbone V, Fluit R, Pellikaan P, et al. TLEM 2.0—a comprehensive musculoskeletal geometry dataset for subject‐specific modeling of lower extremity. J Biomech. 2015;48:734‐741.
LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen AH, Johansen S, Engebretsen L. The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. TJ Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 2007;89:2000‐2010.
Blankevoort L, Kuiper JH, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Articular contact in a three‐dimensional model of the knee. J Biomech. 1991;24:1019‐1031.
Dejtiar DL, Dzialo CM, Pedersen PH, Jensen KK, Fleron MK, Andersen MS. Development and evaluation of a subject‐specific lower limb model with an eleven‐degrees‐of‐freedom natural knee model using magnetic resonance and biplanar x‐ray imaging during a quasi‐static lunge. J Biomech Eng. 2020;142:061001.
Abulhasan J, Snow M, Anley C, Bakhsh M, Grey M. An extensive evaluation of different knee stability assessment measures: a systematic review. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2016;1:209‐229.
Cannon WD. Use of arthrometers to assess knee laxity and outcomes. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2002;10:191‐200.
Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in brief: Kellgren‐Lawrence classification of osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:1886‐1893.
Hunter DJ, Bowes MA, Eaton CB, et al. Can cartilage loss be detected in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with 3−6 months' observation using advanced image analysis of 3T MRI? Osteoarthr Cartil. 2010;18:677‐683.
Williams TG, Holmes AP, Waterton JC, et al. Anatomically corresponded regional analysis of cartilage in asymptomatic and osteoarthritic knees by statistical shape modelling of the bone. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:1541‐1559.
Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three‐dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983;105:136‐144.
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1763‐1768.
Provenzano PP, Heisey D, Hayashi K, Lakes R, Vanderby R. Subfailure damage in ligament: a structural and cellular evaluation. J Appl Physiol. 2002;92:362‐371.
Guo Z, Freeman JW, Barrett JG, De Vita R. Quantification of strain induced damage in medial collateral ligaments. J Biomech Eng. 2015;137:071011.
Leie MA, Klasan A, Oshima T, et al. Large osteophyte removal from the posterior femoral condyle significantly improves extension at the time of surgery in a total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2020;19:76‐83.
Wu XD, Yu JH, Zou T, et al. Anatomical characteristics and biomechanical properties of the oblique popliteal ligament. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42698.
D'Ambrosi R, Corona K, Guerra G, Rubino M, Di Feo F, Ursino N. Biomechanics of the posterior oblique ligament of the knee. Clin Biomech. 2020;80:105205.
Wu G, Cao Y, Song G, et al. The increased tibiofemoral rotation: a potential contributing factor for patellar maltracking in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation. Orthop Surg. 2022;14:1469‐1475.
Butler DL, Kay MD, Stouffer DC. Comparison of material properties in fascicle‐bone units from human patellar tendon and knee ligaments. J Biomech. 1986;19:425‐432.
Lee GC, Cushner FD, Vigoritta V, Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott WN. Evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament integrity and degenerative arthritic patterns in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:59‐65.
Delport H, Labey L, Innocenti B, De Corte R, Vander Sloten J, Bellemans J. Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:2159‐2169.
Mihalko WM, Saleh KJ, Krackow KA, Whiteside LA. Soft‐tissue balancing during total knee arthroplasty in the varus knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:766‐774.
Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Sato J, et al. Size of medial knee osteophytes correlates with knee alignment but not with coronal laxity in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2020;38:639‐644.
Smeets K, Slane J, Scheys L, Claes S, Bellemans J. Mechanical analysis of extra‐articular knee ligaments. Knee. 2017;24:949‐956.
Nagaosa Y. Characterisation of size and direction of osteophyte in knee osteoarthritis: a radiographic study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:319‐324.
Blanke F, Boljen M, Lutter C, Oehler N, Tischer T, Vogt S. Does the anterolateral ligament protect the anterior cruciate ligament in the most common injury mechanisms? A human knee model study. Knee. 2021;29:381‐389.
Guan S, Gray HA, Thomeer LT, Pandy MG. A two‐degree‐of‐freedom knee model predicts full three‐dimensional tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint motion during functional activity. Ann Biomed Eng. 2022;51:493‐505.
Tzanetis P, Marra MA, Fluit R, Koopman B, Verdonschot N. Biomechanical consequences of tibial insert thickness after total knee arthroplasty: a musculoskeletal simulation study. Applied Sciences. 2021;11:2423.
Fishkin Z, Miller D, Ritter C, Ziv I. Changes in human knee ligament stiffness secondary to osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2002;20:204‐207.

Auteurs

Periklis Tzanetis (P)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Kevin de Souza (K)

Stryker, Manchester, UK.

Seonaid Robertson (S)

Stryker, Manchester, UK.

René Fluit (R)

Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Bart Koopman (B)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Nico Verdonschot (N)

Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH