Reducing radiation exposure and costs: CT body scout views with an enhanced protocol versus conventional radiography after shunt surgery.
CT scout
Dose reduction
Hydrocephalus
Radiation
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt
Journal
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery
ISSN: 1872-6968
Titre abrégé: Clin Neurol Neurosurg
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7502039
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Apr 2024
08 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
16
02
2024
revised:
01
04
2024
accepted:
07
04
2024
medline:
12
4
2024
pubmed:
12
4
2024
entrez:
11
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Ventriculoperitoneal shunt implantation has become standard treatment for cerebrospinal fluid diversion, besides endoscopic third ventriculostomy for certain indications. Postoperative X-ray radiography series of skull, chest and abdomen combined with cranial CT are obtained routinely in many institutions to document the shunt position and valve settings in adult patients. Measures to reduce postoperative radiation exposure are needed, however, there is only limited experience with such efforts. Here, we aim to compare routine postoperative cranial CT plus conventional radiography series (retrospective arm) with cranial CT and body scout views only (prospective arm) concerning both diagnostic quality and radiation exposure. After introduction of an enhanced CT imaging protocol, routine skull and abdomen radiography was no longer obtained after VP shunt surgery. The image studies of 25 patients with routine postoperative cranial CT and conventional radiography (retrospective arm of study) were then compared to 25 patients with postoperative cranial CT and CT body scout views (prospective arm of study). Patient demographics such as age, sex and primary diagnosis were collected. The image quality of conventional radiographic images and computed tomography scout views images were independently analyzed by one neurosurgeon and one neuroradiologist. There were no differences in quality assessments according to three different factors determined by two independent investigators for both groups. There was a statistically significant difference, however, between the conventional radiography series group and the CT body scout view imaging group with regard to radiation exposure. The effective dose estimation calculation yielded a difference of 0.05 mSv (two-tailed t-test, p = 0.044) in favor of CT body scout view imaging. Furthermore, the new enhanced protocol resulted in a reduction of cost and the use of human resources. CT body scout view imaging provides sufficient imaging quality to determine shunt positioning and valve settings. With regard to radiation exposure and costs, we suggest that conventional postoperative shunt series may be abandoned.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38604085
pii: S0303-8467(24)00168-9
doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108281
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108281Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing Interests The authors declare no competing interests.