Point-of-choice kilocalorie labelling practices in large, out-of-home food businesses: a preobservational versus post observational study of labelling practices following implementation of The Calorie Labelling (Out of Home Sector) (England) Regulations 2021.

Health policy Nutrition Obesity Public health

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 4 2024
pubmed: 12 4 2024
entrez: 11 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

On 6 April 2022, the UK government implemented mandatory kilocalorie (kcal) labelling regulations for food and drink products sold in the out-of-home food sector (OHFS) in England. Previous assessments of kcal labelling practices in the UK OHFS found a low prevalence of voluntary implementation and poor compliance with labelling recommendations. This study aimed to examine changes in labelling practices preimplementation versus post implementation of mandatory labelling regulations in 2022. In August-December 2021 (preimplementation) and August-November 2022 (post implementation), large OHFS businesses (250 or more employees) subject to labelling regulations were visited. At two time points, a researcher visited the same 117 food outlets (belonging to 90 unique businesses) across four local authorities in England. Outlets were rated for compliance with government regulations for whether kcal labelling was provided at any or all point of choice, provided for all eligible food and drink items, provided per portion for sharing items, if labelling was clear and legible and if kcal reference information was displayed. There was a significant increase (21% preimplementation vs 80% post implementation, OR=40.98 (95% CI 8.08 to 207.74), p<0.001) in the proportion of outlets providing any kcal labelling at point-of-choice post implementation. Only 15% of outlets met all labelling compliance criteria post implementation, with a minority of outlets not presenting labelling in a clear (33%) or legible (29%) way. The number of large businesses in the OHFS providing kcal labelling increased following the implementation of mandatory labelling regulations. However, around one-fifth of eligible outlets sampled were not providing kcal labelling 4-8 months after the regulations came into force, and the majority of businesses only partially complied with government guidance. More effective enforcement may be required to further improve kcal labelling practices in the OHFS in England. Study protocol and analysis strategy preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pfnm6/).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES OBJECTIVE
On 6 April 2022, the UK government implemented mandatory kilocalorie (kcal) labelling regulations for food and drink products sold in the out-of-home food sector (OHFS) in England. Previous assessments of kcal labelling practices in the UK OHFS found a low prevalence of voluntary implementation and poor compliance with labelling recommendations. This study aimed to examine changes in labelling practices preimplementation versus post implementation of mandatory labelling regulations in 2022.
METHODS METHODS
In August-December 2021 (preimplementation) and August-November 2022 (post implementation), large OHFS businesses (250 or more employees) subject to labelling regulations were visited. At two time points, a researcher visited the same 117 food outlets (belonging to 90 unique businesses) across four local authorities in England. Outlets were rated for compliance with government regulations for whether kcal labelling was provided at any or all point of choice, provided for all eligible food and drink items, provided per portion for sharing items, if labelling was clear and legible and if kcal reference information was displayed.
RESULTS RESULTS
There was a significant increase (21% preimplementation vs 80% post implementation, OR=40.98 (95% CI 8.08 to 207.74), p<0.001) in the proportion of outlets providing any kcal labelling at point-of-choice post implementation. Only 15% of outlets met all labelling compliance criteria post implementation, with a minority of outlets not presenting labelling in a clear (33%) or legible (29%) way.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The number of large businesses in the OHFS providing kcal labelling increased following the implementation of mandatory labelling regulations. However, around one-fifth of eligible outlets sampled were not providing kcal labelling 4-8 months after the regulations came into force, and the majority of businesses only partially complied with government guidance. More effective enforcement may be required to further improve kcal labelling practices in the OHFS in England.
PREREGISTRATION BACKGROUND
Study protocol and analysis strategy preregistered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/pfnm6/).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38604637
pii: bmjopen-2023-080405
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080405
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e080405

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: ER has previously received funding from Unilever and the American Beverage Association for unrelated research. AJ has previously received funding from Camurus pharmaceuticals, unrelated to this project

Auteurs

Megan Polden (M)

Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK m.polden@liverpool.ac.uk.
Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Andrew Jones (A)

Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Michael Essman (M)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Jean Adams (J)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Tom Bishop (T)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Thomas Burgoine (T)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Aisling Donohue (A)

Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.

Stephen Sharp (S)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Martin White (M)

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Richard Smith (R)

Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, Devon, UK.

Eric Robinson (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Classifications MeSH