The introduction of a sound reduction bundle in the intensive care unit and its impact on sound levels and patients.

Alarms Intensive care Noise Patient monitor Sound Sound reduction

Journal

Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses
ISSN: 1036-7314
Titre abrégé: Aust Crit Care
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9207852

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 03 09 2023
revised: 18 02 2024
accepted: 18 02 2024
medline: 12 4 2024
pubmed: 12 4 2024
entrez: 11 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

ICU outcomes are continuing to improve. However, this has not been matched by similar improvements of the ICU bedspace environment, which can detrimentally impact on patient outcomes. Excessive sound and noise, especially, has been linked with adverse and potentially preventable patient outcomes and staff errors. There are many sources of sound in the ICU, with alarms from bedside equipment frequently listed as a main source. The number of alarms is increasing in parallel with the introduction of new and more sophisticated technologies to monitor and support patients. However, most alarms are not accurate or critical and are commonly ignored by staff. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sound reduction bundle on sound levels, number of alarms, and patients' experience and perceived quality of sleep in the ICU. This was a pre-post, quasi-experimental study investigating the impact of three study interventions implemented sequentially (staff education, visual warnings when sound levels exceeded the preset levels, and monitor alarm reconfigurations). Effects of staff education were evaluated using pre-education and post-education questionnaires, and the impact on patients was evaluated via self-report questionnaires. A sound-level monitor was used to evaluate changes in sound levels between interventions. Alarm audits were completed before and after alarm reconfiguration. Staff knowledge improved; however, sound levels did not change across interventions. The number of monthly monitor alarms reduced from 600,452 to 115,927. No significant differences were found in patients' subjective rating of their experience and sleep. The interventions did not lead to a sound-level reduction; however, there was a large reduction in ICU monitor alarms without any alarm-related adverse events. As the sources of sound are diverse, multidimensional interventions, including staff education, alarm management solutions, and environmental redesign, are likely to be required to achieve a relevant, lasting, and significant sound reduction.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
ICU outcomes are continuing to improve. However, this has not been matched by similar improvements of the ICU bedspace environment, which can detrimentally impact on patient outcomes. Excessive sound and noise, especially, has been linked with adverse and potentially preventable patient outcomes and staff errors. There are many sources of sound in the ICU, with alarms from bedside equipment frequently listed as a main source. The number of alarms is increasing in parallel with the introduction of new and more sophisticated technologies to monitor and support patients. However, most alarms are not accurate or critical and are commonly ignored by staff.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sound reduction bundle on sound levels, number of alarms, and patients' experience and perceived quality of sleep in the ICU.
METHODS METHODS
This was a pre-post, quasi-experimental study investigating the impact of three study interventions implemented sequentially (staff education, visual warnings when sound levels exceeded the preset levels, and monitor alarm reconfigurations). Effects of staff education were evaluated using pre-education and post-education questionnaires, and the impact on patients was evaluated via self-report questionnaires. A sound-level monitor was used to evaluate changes in sound levels between interventions. Alarm audits were completed before and after alarm reconfiguration.
RESULTS RESULTS
Staff knowledge improved; however, sound levels did not change across interventions. The number of monthly monitor alarms reduced from 600,452 to 115,927. No significant differences were found in patients' subjective rating of their experience and sleep.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The interventions did not lead to a sound-level reduction; however, there was a large reduction in ICU monitor alarms without any alarm-related adverse events. As the sources of sound are diverse, multidimensional interventions, including staff education, alarm management solutions, and environmental redesign, are likely to be required to achieve a relevant, lasting, and significant sound reduction.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38604917
pii: S1036-7314(24)00053-5
doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.02.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Oystein Tronstad (O)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Physiotherapy Department, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: oystein.tronstad@health.qld.gov.au.

Sue Patterson (S)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; School of Dentistry, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Barbara Zangerl (B)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Dylan Flaws (D)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Department of Mental Health, Metro North Mental Health, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, Australia; School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Robert Holdsworth (R)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Lacey Irvine (L)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Stephanie Yerkovich (S)

Menzies School of Health Research and Faculty of Health, Qld University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

India Pearse (I)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

John F Fraser (JF)

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, St. Andrews War Memorial Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

Classifications MeSH