ARTIS Pheno®: a potential tool for cochlear implant surgery.
ARTIS Pheno
Cochlear implantation
High quality of care
Petrous bone abnormalities
Quality control
Journal
European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1434-4726
Titre abrégé: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9002937
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Apr 2024
12 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
10
07
2023
accepted:
28
02
2024
medline:
12
4
2024
pubmed:
12
4
2024
entrez:
12
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Cochlear implantation is a standard approach to hearing rehabilitation and encompasses three main stages: appropriate patient selection, a challenging surgical procedure, which should be as atraumatic as possible and preserve cochlear structures, and lifelong postoperative follow-up. Computed tomography (CT) is performed to assess postoperative implant position. The Siemens Advanced Radar Target Identification System (ARTIS) Pheno provides fluoroscopic imaging during surgery and has so far been mainly used by cardiologists, neurosurgeons and trauma surgeons. Six patients with difficult anatomy or a challenging medical history were selected for a surgical procedure, during which we planned to use the ARTIS Pheno to accurately position and assess implant position under fluoroscopy during and immediately after surgery. In all six cases, the ARTIS Pheno was used directly in the surgical setting. The procedures were performed in cooperation with the neuroradiology department in an interdisciplinary manner. In all six patients, fluoroscopy was used to visualise the procedure at different stages of surgery. In five patients, the procedure was successfully completed. This approach allowed us to finally assess implant position and confirm the correct and complete insertion of the electrode while the patient was still under anaesthesia. These cases showed positive surgical outcomes. Although the procedure is more complex than a standard approach, patients can be managed in a safe, effective and appropriate manner. The assessment of implant position in real time during surgery leads to greater patient and surgeon satisfaction. The approach presented here ensures a high quality of cochlear implant surgery even in difficult surgical situations and meets the requirements of modern surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38607387
doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08588-y
pii: 10.1007/s00405-024-08588-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Schipper J, Klenzner T, Aschendorff A, Arapakis I, Ridder GJ, Laszig R (2004) Navigation-controlled cochleostomy. Is an improvement in the quality of results for cochlear implant surgery possible? HNO 52(4):329–335
doi: 10.1007/s00106-004-1057-5
pubmed: 15014891
Arney D, Goldman JM, Bhargav-Spantzel A, Basu A, Taborn M, Pappas G et al (2012) Simulation of medical device network performance and requirements for an integrated clinical environment. Biomed Instrum Technol 46(4):308–315
doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-46.4.308
pubmed: 22839991
Budde C, Lissat A, Brüning R (2018) “iDoc”: Unterstützung, aber kein Ersatz. Dtsch Arztebl 115(26):1062–1064
Sharma A, Harrington RA, McClellan MB, Turakhia MP, Eapen ZJ, Steinhubl S et al (2018) Using digital health technology to better generate evidence and deliver evidence-based care. J Am Coll Cardiol 71(23):2680–2690
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.03.523
pubmed: 29880129
Franke S, Rockstroh M, Schreiber E, Neumann J, Neumuth T. Context-aware medical assistance systems in integrated surgical environments. 28th Conference of the International Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT); 2016.
Prasser F, Kohlbacher O, Mansmann U, Bauer B, Kuhn KA (2018) Data Integration for Future Medicine (DIFUTURE). Methods Inf Med 57(S 01):e57–e65
doi: 10.3414/ME17-02-0022
pubmed: 30016812
pmcid: 6178202
Valsamis EM, Chouari T, O’Dowd-Booth C, Rogers B, Ricketts D (2018) Learning curves in surgery: variables, analysis and applications. Postgrad Med J 94(1115):525–530
doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135880
pubmed: 30209180
Mazzon G, Sridhar A, Busuttil G, Thompson J, Nathan S, Briggs T et al (2017) Learning curves for robotic surgery: a review of the recent literature. Curr Urol Rep 18(11):89
doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0738-z
pubmed: 28942572
Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K (2014) Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve’: methods, variables and competency. BJU Int 113(3):504–508
doi: 10.1111/bju.12197
pubmed: 23819461
Pernar LIM, Robertson FC, Tavakkoli A, Sheu EG, Brooks DC, Smink DS (2017) An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery. Surg Endosc 31(11):4583–4596
doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5520-2
pubmed: 28411345
Neumann J, Rockstroh M, Franke S, Neumuth T, editors. BPMNSIX–A BPMN 2.0 Surgical Intervention Extension. 7th Workshop on Modeling and Monitoring of Computer Assisted Interventions (M2CAI), 19th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Interventions (MICCAI 2016), Athens, Greece; 2016.
Chan JWY, Yu PSY, Lau RWH, Ng CSH (2020) ARTIS Pheno(®)-the future of thoracic hybrid theatre for lung nodule resection? J Thorac Dis 12(9):4602–4605
doi: 10.21037/jtd-2020-50
pubmed: 33145031
pmcid: 7578484
Cheng YF, Chen HC, Ke PC, Hung WH, Cheng CY, Lin CH et al (2020) Image-guided video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with Artis Pheno for pulmonary nodule resection. J Thorac Dis 12(4):1342–1349
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.02.12
pubmed: 32395271
pmcid: 7212139
Jablonski GE, Falkenberg-Jensen B, Bunne M, Iftikhar M, Greisiger R, Opheim LR et al (2021) Fusion of technology in cochlear implantation surgery: investigation of fluoroscopically assisted robotic electrode insertion. Front Surg 8:741401
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.741401
pubmed: 34820415
pmcid: 8606737
McClendon J, Almekkawi AK, Abi-Aad KR, Maiti T (2020) Use of Pheno room, augmented reality, and 3-rod technique for 3-dimensional correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg 137:291
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.094
pubmed: 31982598
McClendon J, Turcotte EL, Pai MG, Maiti T, Singh R, Bendok BR (2021) Use of temporary rod and intraoperative neuroimaging for correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 20(6):E438
doi: 10.1093/ons/opab002
pubmed: 33556181
Reynolds T, Dillon O, Prinable J, Whelan B, Keall PJ, O’Brien RT (2021) Adaptive CaRdiac cOne BEAm computed Tomography (ACROBEAT): developing the next generation of cardiac cone beam CT imaging. Med Phys 48(5):2543–2552
doi: 10.1002/mp.14811
pubmed: 33651409
Strandberg L, Jonasson P, Larsson M (2021) Evaluation of radiation doses using cone beam computed tomography in endovascular aortic repair and scoliosis procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 195(3–4):306–313
doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncab050
pubmed: 33876250
Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26(3):598–606
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2
pubmed: 21993935
Tsuda S, Oleynikov D, Gould J, Azagury D, Sandler B, Hutter M et al (2015) SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci® surgical system (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Surg Endosc 29(10):2873–2884
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4428-y
pubmed: 26205559