Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences - a scoping review.

Online group work community of inquiry framework health education health science higher education online education scoping review student group work

Journal

Medical education online
ISSN: 1087-2981
Titre abrégé: Med Educ Online
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9806550

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
31 Dec 2024
Historique:
medline: 12 4 2024
pubmed: 12 4 2024
entrez: 12 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In health education, group work is essential to prepare students for working in health care and medical teams. Following the widespread adoption of online teaching, group work increasingly takes place in online environments. Although successful group work can provide good learning outcomes, it is unclear what facilitates or hinders online group work in health science education, and to what extent this topic has been addressed. Thus, this scoping review aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher health education, provide an overview of the scientific literature related to the topic, and identify knowledge gaps in the research. This scoping review was guided by the methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley, and reporting is in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). Eight online databases were searched for scientific articles published between 2012 and 2022. At least two researchers independently screened records and full-text articles and charted data including article characteristics and key information related to the research question. Findings were categorized and summarized based on the Community of Inquiry Framework. After screening 3671 records and 466 full-text articles, 39 articles met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed smaller group size, consistency in group composition and joint responsibility to be facilitators. Challenges with group communication, scheduling synchronous meetings and technical issues were identified as barriers. Our findings supported the importance of all three elements of the Community of Inquiry Framework: social, cognitive, and teaching presence. This review provides an overview of facilitators and barriers to online group work in health science education. However, there is a need for further investigation of these factors and studies addressing this topic from the teachers' perspective.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38608002
doi: 10.1080/10872981.2024.2341508
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2341508

Auteurs

Live Edvardsen Tonheim (L)

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Marianne Molin (M)

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Asgeir Brevik (A)

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Malene Wøhlk Gundersen (M)

Division for Research, Development and University Library, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Lisa Garnweidner-Holme (L)

Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH