Platinum dose in neoadjuvant therapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Breast cancer Carboplatin Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Network meta-analysis Triple negative

Journal

Current problems in cancer
ISSN: 1535-6345
Titre abrégé: Curr Probl Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7702986

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 06 05 2023
revised: 25 03 2024
accepted: 26 03 2024
medline: 13 4 2024
pubmed: 13 4 2024
entrez: 12 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There are multiple neoadjuvant regimens, including platinum agents for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), each with a different safety profile, outcome, and pathologic complete response rate (pCR%). We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of different platinum-based neoadjuvant CT treatments for TNBC. Bibliographic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception to October 31, 2022. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that evaluated the addition of carboplatin or cisplatin to standard neoadjuvant CT for TNBC. The primary endpoints were pCR rates and DFS/EFS, while the secondary endpoints were grade (G)3-4 hematological toxicity and OS. Thirteen trials involving 3154 patients comparing six treatments (carboplatin AUC 5, carboplatin AUC 6, carboplatin AUC 2, carboplatin AUC 1.5, cisplatin 75 mg/m2, and standard anthracycline-and/or taxane-based CT) were identified. Based on the most effective treatments added to neoadjuvant CT, carboplatin AUC 2 was associated with the least improvement in pCR% (RR, 1.49; 95%CI, 1.23, 1.8), carboplatin AUC 6 was associated with similar improvement in pCR% (RR 1.58, 95%CI, 1.35, 1.84) and carboplatin AUC 5 with the highest improvement in pCR% (RR 2.23, 95%CI, 1.6,32). The treatment associated with the most considerable improvement in DFS when added to neoadjuvant CT was carboplatin AUC 5 (HR 0.36, 95%CI 0.18, 0.73). It was also better than AUC 6 and AUC 2 (HR= 0.45, 95%CI 0.21-0.96 and HR=0.48, 95%CI 0.23-0.98). All schedules exhibited similar outcomes in terms of OS; however, only AUC 2 demonstrated a significant improvement compared to the no-platinum arms. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia G3-4 were significantly increased by carboplatin AUC 6. Based on this network meta-analysis, carboplatin AUC 5 added to standard neoadjuvant CT may provide substantial pCR and DFS benefits with a low toxicity risk compared to other carboplatin doses.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38608530
pii: S0147-0272(24)00037-0
doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101096
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101096

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Fausto Petrelli (F)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy. Electronic address: faupe@libero.it.

Antonio Ghidini (A)

Oncology Unit, Casa di cura Igea, Milan, Italy.

Carmen Rea (C)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.

Maria Chiara Parati (MC)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.

Karen Borgonovo (K)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.

Michele Ghidini (M)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Fiorella Ruatta (F)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Alberto Zaniboni (A)

Oncology Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.

Andrea Luciani (A)

Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio, BG, Italy.

Ornella Garrone (O)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Gianluca Tomasello (G)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH