Feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure with suture-mediated vascular closure device.

Ablation Ultrasound-guidance VCD Vascular closure device Venous closure

Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 02 03 2024
revised: 05 04 2024
accepted: 07 04 2024
medline: 13 4 2024
pubmed: 13 4 2024
entrez: 12 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Complications of venous vascular access are usually non-fatal but are the most common complications after transvenous catheter intervention. Vascular closure devices (VCD) have recently become available for venous closure. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure using suture-mediated VCD in patients who underwent catheter ablation. This single-center observational study enrolled 226 consecutive patients who underwent elective catheter ablation with femoral venipuncture. Regarding hemostasis, vessel closure using VCD was performed with real-time ultrasound guidance after 2022 (n=123) and without ultrasound guidance in 2021 (n=103). The occurrence of venous access site-related complications (major, minor, or other) was compared. The rate of device failure was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (1.6% vs. 6.3%; p=0.048). The occurrence of all venous access site-related complications was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (4.9% vs. 18.4%, p=0.001). Time to ambulation was shorter in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (2.0 ± 0.1 hours vs. 2.2 ± 0.6 hours, p < 0.001). Real-time ultrasound guidance can reduce device failure, access site-related complications, and time to ambulation when performing venous closure with a VCD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Complications of venous vascular access are usually non-fatal but are the most common complications after transvenous catheter intervention. Vascular closure devices (VCD) have recently become available for venous closure.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of real-time ultrasound-guided venous closure using suture-mediated VCD in patients who underwent catheter ablation.
METHODS METHODS
This single-center observational study enrolled 226 consecutive patients who underwent elective catheter ablation with femoral venipuncture. Regarding hemostasis, vessel closure using VCD was performed with real-time ultrasound guidance after 2022 (n=123) and without ultrasound guidance in 2021 (n=103). The occurrence of venous access site-related complications (major, minor, or other) was compared.
RESULTS RESULTS
The rate of device failure was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (1.6% vs. 6.3%; p=0.048). The occurrence of all venous access site-related complications was significantly lower in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (4.9% vs. 18.4%, p=0.001). Time to ambulation was shorter in patients with ultrasound-guidance than in those without (2.0 ± 0.1 hours vs. 2.2 ± 0.6 hours, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Real-time ultrasound guidance can reduce device failure, access site-related complications, and time to ambulation when performing venous closure with a VCD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38608918
pii: S1547-5271(24)02368-3
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.04.041
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Masaya Tachi (M)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan; Department of Cardiology, Nakatugawa Municipal Hospital, Nakatugawa, Japan.

Akihito Tanaka (A)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. Electronic address: akihito17491194@gmail.com.

Tsubasa Teraoka (T)

Department of Cardiology, Nakatugawa Municipal Hospital, Nakatugawa, Japan.

Tappei Furuta (T)

Department of Cardiology, Nakatugawa Municipal Hospital, Nakatugawa, Japan.

Etsushi Matsushita (E)

Department of Cardiology, Nakatugawa Municipal Hospital, Nakatugawa, Japan.

Kazunori Hayashi (K)

Department of Cardiology, Nakatugawa Municipal Hospital, Nakatugawa, Japan.

Masafumi Shimojo (M)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Satoshi Yanagisawa (S)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Yasuya Inden (Y)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Toyoaki Murohara (T)

Department of Cardiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Classifications MeSH