'Stopping the start': support for proposed tobacco control policies - a population-based survey in Great Britain 2021-2023.

Electronic nicotine delivery devices End game Public opinion Public policy

Journal

Tobacco control
ISSN: 1468-3318
Titre abrégé: Tob Control
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9209612

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 22 12 2023
accepted: 04 04 2024
medline: 13 4 2024
pubmed: 13 4 2024
entrez: 12 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This study assessed public support for four proposed tobacco control policies in Great Britain: (1) Raising the sales age of tobacco by 1 year every year (Smokefree Generation); (2) Raising the sales age of tobacco from 18 years to 21 years; (3) Providing prescription e-cigarettes as smoking cessation aids to adults who smoke; (4) Restricting e-cigarette advertising to prevent youth uptake. Repeat cross-sectional population-based survey weighted to match the population of Great Britain. The survey was conducted in England, Scotland and Wales in September 2021, October 2022 and October 2023. 6541 adults living in Great Britain. Support for each policy and year and prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing support between years and subgroups. The most popular policy each year was restricting e-cigarette advertising (74%/79%/85%), followed by raising the sales age to 21 years (50%/58%/64%), providing prescription e-cigarettes (45%/44%/47%) and Smokefree Generation (34%/44%/49%). The largest increases were for policies about the age of sale (Smokefree Generation: 2021/2022 PR=1.28, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.40, 2022/2023 PR=1.12, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.20; raising the age to 21 years: 2021/2022 PR=1.16, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.23, 2022/2023 PR=1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.17). Only 30% opposed Smokefree Generation in 2023 down from 41% in 2021. Support for each policy increased each year, except for providing prescription e-cigarettes. Restricting e-cigarette advertising was the most popular policy, while support for age of sale policies, in particular for a Smokefree Generation, grew most. The study protocol was published on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/46z2c/) prior to starting the analysis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38609176
pii: tc-2023-058571
doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058571
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: JB has received unrestricted research funding from Pfizer and J&J, who manufacture smoking cessation medications. LK’s salary is supported by the US Food and Drug Administration and the National Institute on Drug Abuse. LS has received honoraria for talks, unrestricted research grants and travel expenses to attend meetings and workshops from manufacturers of smoking cessation medications (Pfizer; J&J) and has acted as paid reviewer for grant awarding bodies and as a paid consultant for healthcare companies. All authors declare no financial links with tobacco companies, e-cigarette manufacturers or their representatives.

Auteurs

Vera Helen Buss (VH)

Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK v.buss@ucl.ac.uk.
SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Lion Shahab (L)

Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Linda Bauld (L)

SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Usher Institute and UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Loren Kock (L)

Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA.

Hazel Cheeseman (H)

SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
Action on Smoking and Health, London, UK.

Jamie Brown (J)

Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK.
SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.

Classifications MeSH