Federal food assistance accessibility and acceptability among Indigenous Peoples in the United States: A scoping review.

American Indian/Alaska Native Indigenous Native American acceptability accessibility food assistance scoping review

Journal

The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 30 01 2024
revised: 11 03 2024
accepted: 08 04 2024
medline: 14 4 2024
pubmed: 14 4 2024
entrez: 13 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The purpose of this scoping review was to determine the extent to which accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs in the United States (U.S.) have been evaluated among Indigenous Peoples, and to summarize what is currently known. Twelve publications were found that examine aspects of accessibility or acceptability by indigenous peoples of one or more federal food assistance programs, including the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and/or the Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR) (n=8), the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) (n=3), and the National School Lunch Program (NSLP) (n=1). No publications were found to include the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSFP) or the Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP). Publications ranged in time from 1990 - 2023, and all reported on findings from rural populations, while three also included urban settings. Program accessibility varied by program type and geographic location. Road conditions, transportation access, telephone and internet connectivity, and overall number of food stores were identified as key access barriers to SNAP and WIC benefit redemption in rural areas. Program acceptability was attributed to factors such as being tribally administered, providing culturally sensitive services, and offering foods of cultural significance. For these reasons, FDPIR and WIC were more frequently described as acceptable compared to SNAP and NSLP. However, SNAP was occasionally described as more acceptable than other assistance programs because it allows participants autonomy to decide which foods to purchase and when. Overall, little attention has been paid to the accessibility and acceptability of federal food assistance programs among Indigenous Peoples in the U.S. More research is needed to understand and improve the participation experiences and health trajectories of these priority populations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38614239
pii: S0022-3166(24)00220-7
doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.04.017
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : T32 DK062707
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Society for Nutrition. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Michelle Estradé (M)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. Electronic address: mestrad7@jhu.edu.

Bree Bode (B)

Michigan Fitness Foundation.

Melissa Walls (M)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Emma C Lewis (EC)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Lisa Poirier (L)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Samantha M Sundermeir (SM)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Joel Gittelsohn (J)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

Classifications MeSH