Expression of immune-related genes and breast cancer recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Breast cancer
DCIS
Ductal carcinoma in situ
Gene expression
Immune system
Invasive
Recurrence
Relapse
Risk
Tumor microenvironment
Journal
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Apr 2024
12 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
10
01
2024
revised:
19
03
2024
accepted:
07
04
2024
medline:
15
4
2024
pubmed:
15
4
2024
entrez:
14
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer with highly variable clinical behavior, but risk stratification is still challenging. We sought to identify immune-related gene expression signatures of pure DCIS associated with different risks of breast cancer recurrence. A retrospective nested case-control study of 143 pure DCIS was performed including 70 women with subsequent ipsilateral breast event (IBE, in situ or invasive; cases) and 73 DCIS women with no IBE and matched for age, tumor size, treatment, hormone receptors/HER2 status, and follow-up time (controls). RNA was extracted from DCIS samples and subjected to next-generation sequencing gene expression analysis of 395 immune-related genes. Correlations between DCIS immune-related gene expression and IBE were analyzed using weighted Cox regression for nested case-control data. Eight immune-related genes were differentially expressed between cases and controls. MAGEA10 expression (present vs. absent) and high expression levels of IFNA17 and CBLB (Q4 vs. Q1) were observed more frequently in DCIS of women with subsequent IBE, mainly invasive (p-value This exploratory analysis of pure DCIS showed significant differences in immune-related gene expression profiles between women with and with no subsequent IBE, particularly as invasive IBE. These results, after additional validation, could improve risk stratification and management of DCIS patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer with highly variable clinical behavior, but risk stratification is still challenging. We sought to identify immune-related gene expression signatures of pure DCIS associated with different risks of breast cancer recurrence.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective nested case-control study of 143 pure DCIS was performed including 70 women with subsequent ipsilateral breast event (IBE, in situ or invasive; cases) and 73 DCIS women with no IBE and matched for age, tumor size, treatment, hormone receptors/HER2 status, and follow-up time (controls). RNA was extracted from DCIS samples and subjected to next-generation sequencing gene expression analysis of 395 immune-related genes. Correlations between DCIS immune-related gene expression and IBE were analyzed using weighted Cox regression for nested case-control data.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eight immune-related genes were differentially expressed between cases and controls. MAGEA10 expression (present vs. absent) and high expression levels of IFNA17 and CBLB (Q4 vs. Q1) were observed more frequently in DCIS of women with subsequent IBE, mainly invasive (p-value
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This exploratory analysis of pure DCIS showed significant differences in immune-related gene expression profiles between women with and with no subsequent IBE, particularly as invasive IBE. These results, after additional validation, could improve risk stratification and management of DCIS patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38615592
pii: S0959-8049(24)00719-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114063
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
114063Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no competing financial interests in relation to the work described. E.G-R. has received advisory fees, honoraria, travel accommodation/ expenses, grants and/or non-financial support from AstraZeneca, Exact Sciences, GSK, Illumina, MSD, Novartis, Roche, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. N.F. has received honoraria for consulting/advisory roles from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Diaceutics, Adicet Bio, and Sermonix, speaker bureau from MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Gilead, Diaceutics, and research grants from Novartis and Reply. These companies had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and/or in the decision to publish the results. All other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.