A comparison of traditional and net structured intersomatic cages in the lombosacral region: A biomechanical analysis for enhancing discopathy treatment.

The vertebral column represents an essential element for support, mobility, and the protection of the central nervous system. Various pathologies can compromise these vital functions, leading to pain and a decrease in the quality of life. Within the scope of this study, a novel redesign of the Intersomatic Cage, traditionally used in the presence of discopathy, was proposed. The adoption of additive manufacturing technology allowed for the creation of highly complex geometries, focusing on the lumbosacral tract, particularly on the L4-L5 and L5-S1 intervertebral discs. In addition to the tensile analysis carried out using Finite Element Analysis (FEA) in static simulations, a parallel study on the range of motion (ROM) of the aforementioned vertebral pairs was conducted. The ROM represents the relative movement range between various vertebral pairs. The introduction of the intersomatic cage between the vertebrae, replacing the pulpy nucleus of the intervertebral disc, could influence the ROM, thus having significant clinical implications. For the analysis, the ligaments were modelled using a 1D approach. Their constraint reaction and deformability upon load application were analysed to better understand the potential biomechanical implications arising from the adoption of the cages. During the FEA simulations, two types of cages were analysed: LLIF for L4-L5 and ALIF for L5-S1, subjecting them to four different loading conditions. The results indicate that the stresses exhibited by cages with a NET structure are generally lower compared to those of traditional cages. This stress reduction in cages with NET structure suggests a more optimal load distribution, but it is essential to assess potential repercussions on the surrounding bone structure.

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.