What Are Healthy Societies? A Thematic Analysis of Relevant Conceptual Frameworks.

Commercial Determinants of Health Health Paradigms Health Policy Healthy Societies Social Determinants of Health Structural Determinants of Health

Journal

International journal of health policy and management
ISSN: 2322-5939
Titre abrégé: Int J Health Policy Manag
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101619905

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 09 06 2022
accepted: 16 10 2023
medline: 1 1 2023
pubmed: 1 1 2023
entrez: 15 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

While support for the idea of fostering healthy societies is longstanding, there is a gap in the literature on what they are, how to beget them, and how experience might inform future efforts. This paper explores developments since Alma Ata (1978) to understand how a range of related concepts and fields inform approaches to healthy societies and to develop a model to help conceptualize future research and policy initiatives. Drawing on 68 purposively selected documents, including political declarations, commission and agency reports, peer-reviewed papers and guidance notes, we undertook qualitative thematic analysis. Three independent researchers compiled and categorised themes describing the domains of a potential healthy societies approach. The literature provides numerous frameworks. Some of these frameworks promote alternative endpoints to development, eschewing short-term economic growth in favour of health, equity, well-being and sustainability. They also identify values, such as gender equality, collaboration, human rights and empowerment that provide the pathways to, or underpin, such endpoints. We categorize the literature into four "components": people; places; products; and planet. People refers to social positions, interactions and networks creating well-being. Places are physical environments-built and natural-and the interests and policies shaping them. Products are commodities and commercial practices impacting population health. Planet places human health in the context of the 'Anthropocene.' These components interact in complex ways across global, regional, country and community levels as outlined in our heuristic. The literature offers little critical reflection on why greater progress has not been made, or on the need to organise and resist the prevailing systems which perpetuate ill-health.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
While support for the idea of fostering healthy societies is longstanding, there is a gap in the literature on what they are, how to beget them, and how experience might inform future efforts. This paper explores developments since Alma Ata (1978) to understand how a range of related concepts and fields inform approaches to healthy societies and to develop a model to help conceptualize future research and policy initiatives.
METHODS METHODS
Drawing on 68 purposively selected documents, including political declarations, commission and agency reports, peer-reviewed papers and guidance notes, we undertook qualitative thematic analysis. Three independent researchers compiled and categorised themes describing the domains of a potential healthy societies approach.
RESULTS RESULTS
The literature provides numerous frameworks. Some of these frameworks promote alternative endpoints to development, eschewing short-term economic growth in favour of health, equity, well-being and sustainability. They also identify values, such as gender equality, collaboration, human rights and empowerment that provide the pathways to, or underpin, such endpoints. We categorize the literature into four "components": people; places; products; and planet. People refers to social positions, interactions and networks creating well-being. Places are physical environments-built and natural-and the interests and policies shaping them. Products are commodities and commercial practices impacting population health. Planet places human health in the context of the 'Anthropocene.' These components interact in complex ways across global, regional, country and community levels as outlined in our heuristic.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The literature offers little critical reflection on why greater progress has not been made, or on the need to organise and resist the prevailing systems which perpetuate ill-health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38618792
doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2023.7450
pii: 7450
doi:
pii:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7450

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Author(s); Published by Kerman University of Medical Sciences This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Auteurs

Kent Buse (K)

The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Amy Bestman (A)

Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Siddharth Srivastava (S)

The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.

Robert Marten (R)

The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.

Sonam Yangchen (S)

The Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland.

Devaki Nambiar (D)

The George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.
Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Prasanna School of Public Health, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Classifications MeSH