Use of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT for lymph node assessment before radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients.

18F‐FDG PET/CT bladder cancer lymph node neoadjuvant therapy pelvic lymph node dissection radical cystectomy staging

Journal

BJU international
ISSN: 1464-410X
Titre abrégé: BJU Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100886721

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 16 4 2024
pubmed: 16 4 2024
entrez: 15 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomograpy (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in nodal staging before radical cystectomy (RC) and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for bladder cancer (BCa). This analysis was based on a cohort of 199 BCa patients undergoing RC and bilateral PLND between 2015 and 2022. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or immunotherapy (NAI) was administered after oncological evaluation. All patients received preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT to assess extravesical disease. Point estimates for true negative, false negative, false positive, true positive, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of conventional imaging and PET/CT were calculated. Subgroup analysis in patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment was performed. At preoperative evaluation, 30 patients (15.1%) had 48 suspicious nodal spots on 18F-FDG PET/CT. At RC and bilateral PLND, a total of 4871 lymph nodes (LNs) were removed with 237 node metastases corresponding to 126 different regions. Pathological node metastases were found in 17/30 (57%) vs 39/169 patients (23%) with suspicious vs negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.30, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.57, NPV = 0.77, accuracy = 0.74). On per-region analysis including 1367 nodal regions, LN involvement was found in 19/48 (39%) vs 105/1319 (8%) suspicious vs negative regions at PET/CT, respectively (sensitivity = 0.15, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.40, NPV = 0.92, ACC = 0.90). Similar results were observed for patients receiving NAC (n = 44, 32.1%) and NAI (n = 93, 67.9% [per-patient: sensitivity = 0.36, specificity = 0.91, PPV = 0.59, NPV = 0.80, accuracy = 0.77; per-region: sensitivity = 0.12, specificity = 0.98, PPV = 0.32, NPV = 0.93, ACC = 0.91]). Study limitations include its retrospective design and limited patient numbers. In eight out of 10 patients with negative preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT, pN0 disease was confirmed at final pathology. No differences were found based on NAC vs NAI treatment. These findings suggest that 18F-FDG PET/CT could play a role in the preoperative evaluation of nodal metastases in BCa patients, although its cost-effectiveness is uncertain.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38621771
doi: 10.1111/bju.16363
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.

Références

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71: 209–249
Lobo N, Afferi L, Moschini M et al. Epidemiology, screening, and prevention of bladder cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2022; 5: 628–639
Gore JL, Litwin MS, Lai J et al. Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst 2010; 102: 802–811
Witjes JA, Bruins HM, Carrión A et al. EAU guidelines on muscle‐invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. 2023
Dorfman RE, Alpern MB, Gross BH et al. Upper abdominal lymph nodes: criteria for normal size determined with CT. Radiology 1991; 180: 319–322
Karl A, Carroll PR, Gschwend JE et al. The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 826–835
Almuhaideb A, Papathanasiou N, Bomanji J. 18F‐FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology. Ann Saudi Med 2011; 31: 3–13
Apolo AB, Riches J, Schöder H et al. Clinical value of fluorine‐18 2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐D‐glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in bladder cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 3973–3978
Darwish C, Sparks A, Amdur R et al. Trends in treatment strategies and comparison of outcomes in lymph node positive bladder cancer: an analysis of the national cancer database. Urology 2020; 146: 168–176
Moussa M, Chakra MA, Saad W et al. The role of 18F‐FDG PET/CT scan compared to CT‐scan alone for lymph node staging before radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2021; 39: 833.e9–17
Omorphos NP, Ghose A, Hayes JDB et al. The increasing indications of FDG‐PET/CT in the staging and management of invasive bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 2022; 40: 434–441
Ha HK, Koo PJ, Kim SJ. Diagnostic accuracy of F‐18 FDG PET/CT for preoperative lymph node staging in newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Oncology 2018; 95: 31–38
Zhang H, Xing W, Kang Q et al. Diagnostic value of [18F] FDG‐PET and PET/CT in urinary bladder cancer: a meta‐analysis. Tumour Biol 2015; 36: 3209–3214
Girard A, Rouanne M, Taconet S et al. Integrated analysis of 18F‐FDG PET/CT improves preoperative lymph node staging for patients with invasive bladder cancer. Eur Radiol 2019; 29: 4286–4293
Bacchiani M, Salamone V, Massaro E et al. Assessing the performance of 18F‐FDG PET/CT in bladder cancer: a narrative review of current evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15: 2951
Lonati C, Mordasini L, Afferi L et al. Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative lymph node staging of bladder cancer according to different lymph node locations: a multicenter cohort from the European Association of Urology – Young Academic Urologists. Urol Oncol 2022; 40: 195.e27–35
Fitoussi O, Roche JB, Riviere J et al. Accuracy of FDG‐PET/CT for response evaluation of muscle‐invasive bladder cancer following neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy. Urol Int 2023; 107: 239–245
Marandino L, Capozza A, Bandini M et al. [18F]Fluoro‐deoxy‐glucose positron emission tomography to evaluate lymph node involvement in patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer receiving neoadjuvant pembrolizumab. Urol Oncol 2021; 39: 235.e15–21
Aljabery F, Lindblom G, Skoog S et al. PET/CT versus conventional CT for detection of lymph node metastases in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer. BMC Urol 2015; 15: 87
Flaig TW, Spiess PE, Agarwal N et al. Bladder cancer, version 3.2020, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 2020; 18: 329–354
Moschini M, Afferi L, Gandaglia G et al. Prediction of the need for an extended lymphadenectomy at the time of radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 7: 1067–1074
Bruins HM, Veskimae E, Hernandez V et al. The impact of the extent of lymphadenectomy on oncologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 1065–1077
Katims AB, Bochner BH. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection in muscle invasive bladder cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33: 252–257
Lerner SP, Tangen C, Svatek RS et al. SWOG S1011: a phase III surgical trial to evaluate the benefit of a standard versus an extended lymphadenectomy performed at time of radical cystectomy for muscle invasive urothelial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41: 4508

Auteurs

Mattia Longoni (M)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Pietro Scilipoti (P)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Chiara Re (C)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Giuseppe Rosiello (G)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Luigi Nocera (L)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Pellegrino (F)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Giuseppe Basile (G)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Mario de Angelis (M)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Leonardo Quarta (L)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Giusy Burgio (G)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Necchi (A)

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Antonio Cigliola (A)

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Arturo Chiti (A)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Maria Picchio (M)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Salonia (A)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Alberto Briganti (A)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Francesco Montorsi (F)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Marco Moschini (M)

Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH