Assessing the perioperative outcomes of abdominal drain omission after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

Complications Drain Nephrectomy Renal neoplasm Robotic

Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 19 12 2023
accepted: 10 04 2024
medline: 16 4 2024
pubmed: 16 4 2024
entrez: 15 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement (vs. omission) on perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), focusing on complications, time to canalization, deambulation, and pain management. A prospectively-maintained institutional database was queried to get data of patients who underwent RAPN for renal masses between January 2018 and May 2023 at our Institution. Baseline, surgical, and postoperative data were collected. Retrieved patients were stratified based upon placement of abdominal drain (Y/N). Descriptive analyses comparing the two groups were conducted as appropriate.77 After adjusting for potential confounders, a logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate significant predictors of any grade and "major" complications. 342 patients were included: 192 patients in the "drain group" versus 150 patients in the "no-drain" group. Renal masses were larger (p < 0.001) and at higher complexity (RENAL score, p = 0.01), in the drain group. Procedures in the drain group had statistically significantly longer operative time, ischemia time, and higher blood loss (all p-values < 0.001). The urinary collecting system was more likely involved compared to the no-drain group (p = 0.01). At multivariate analysis, abdominal drainage was not a significant predictor of any grade (OR 0.79, 95%CI 0.33-1.87) and major postoperative complications (OR 3.62, 95%CI 0.53-9.68). Patients in the drain group experienced a statistically significantly higher hemoglobin drop (p < 0.01). Moreover, they exhibited statistically significant higher paracetamol consumption (p < 0.001) and need for additional opioids (p = 0.02). In summary, the study results suggest the safety of omitting drain placement and remark on the need for personalized decision-making, which considers patient and procedural factors.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w PMID: 38622320
pubmed: 38622320
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-59404-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

8658

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Porcaro, A. B. et al. Is a drain needed after robotic radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection? Results of a single-center randomized clinical trial. J. Endourol. 35(6), 922–928. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0176 (2021).
doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0176 pubmed: 30398382
Tan, J. S. et al. Outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for imperative versus elective indications. BJU Int. 128(S3), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15581 (2021).
doi: 10.1111/bju.15581 pubmed: 34448346
Bertolo, R. et al. Outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors: A multicenter analysis (ROSULA Collaborative Group). Eur. Urol. 74(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.004 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.004 pubmed: 29784191
Kowalewski, K. F. et al. Prophylactic abdominal or retroperitoneal drain placement in major uro-oncological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies on radical prostatectomy, cystectomy and partial nephrectomy. World J. Urol. 38(8), 1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02978-2 (2020).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02978-2 pubmed: 31664510
Kriegmair, M. C. et al. Drain placement can safely be omitted for open partial nephrectomy: Results from a prospective randomized trial. Int. J. Urol. 23(5), 390–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13063 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/iju.13063 pubmed: 26890474
Chahal, B. et al. The learning curves of major laparoscopic and robotic procedures in urology: A systematic review. Int. J. Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345 (2023).
doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000345 pubmed: 37132184 pmcid: 10389344
Dindo, D., Demartines, N. & Clavien, P.-A. Classification of surgical complications. Ann. Surg. 240(2), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae (2004).
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 15273542 pmcid: 1360123
Levey, A. S. et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 150(9), 604. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 (2009).
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006 pubmed: 19414839 pmcid: 2763564
Kutikov, A. & Uzzo, R. G. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: A comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J. Urol. 182(3), 844–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035 pubmed: 19616235
Assel, M. et al. Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology. Eur. Urol. 75(3), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.014 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.12.014 pubmed: 30580902
Abaza, R. & Prall, D. Drain placement can be safely omitted after the majority of robotic partial nephrectomies. J. Urol. 189(3), 823–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.236 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.236 pubmed: 23009869
Beksac, A. T. et al. Should a drain be routinely required after transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy?. J. Endourol. 34(9), 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0325 (2020).
doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0325 pubmed: 32597218
Peyronnet, B. et al. Postoperative drainage does not prevent complications after robotic partial nephrectomy. World J. Urol. 34(7), 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1721-2 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1721-2 pubmed: 26511751
Sarwani, N. I., Motta Ramirez, G. A., Remer, E. M., Kaouk, J. H. & Gill, I. S. Imaging findings after minimally invasive nephron-sparing renal therapies. Clin. Radiol. 62(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.019 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2006.08.019 pubmed: 17331826
Potretzke, A. M. et al. Urinary fistula after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: A multicentre analysis of 1 791 patients. BJU Int. 117(1), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13249 (2016).
doi: 10.1111/bju.13249 pubmed: 26235802
Wang, J.-H., Kung, Y.-H., King, T.-M., Chang, M.-C. & Hsu, C.-W. Measurement of peritoneal fluid urea nitrogen and creatinine levels is useful to detect iatrogenic urinary tract leakage in colorectal surgery. J. Chin. Med. Assoc. 78(5), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2015.01.006 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2015.01.006 pubmed: 25769933
Regmi, S. et al. Drain fluid creatinine-to-serum creatinine ratio as an initial test to detect urine leakage following cystectomy: A retrospective study. Indian J. Urol. 37(2), 153. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_396_20 (2021).
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_396_20 pubmed: 34103798 pmcid: 8173937
Williams, R. D., Snowden, C. & Thiel, D. D. Assessment of perioperative variables that predict the need for surgical drains following robotic partial nephrectomy utilizing quantitative drain creatinine analysis. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. 27(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0417 (2017).
doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0417
Sánchez-Ortiz, R., Madsen, L. T., Swanson, D. A., Canfield, S. E. & Wood, C. G. Closed suction or penrose drainage after partial nephrectomy: Does It Matter?. J. Urol. 171(1), 244–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000099940.02698.38 (2004).
doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000099940.02698.38 pubmed: 14665885
Kahn, A. E., Shumate, A. M., Ball, C. T. & Thiel, D. D. Elimination of surgical drains following robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. J. Robot. Surg. 13(6), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00922-5 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00922-5 pubmed: 30627941
Godoy, G. et al. Routine drain placement after partial nephrectomy is not always necessary. J. Urol. 186(2), 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.151 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.151 pubmed: 21683403
Schein, M. To drain or not to drain? The role of drainage in the contaminated and infected abdomen: An international and personal perspective. World J. Surg. 32(2), 312–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9277-y (2008).
doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9277-y pubmed: 18080709
Cerantola, Y. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin. Nutr. 32(6), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.09.014 pubmed: 24189391
Zainfeld, D. & Djaladat, H. Enhanced recovery after urologic surgery—Current applications and future directions. J. Surg. Oncol. 116(5), 630–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24821 (2017).
doi: 10.1002/jso.24821 pubmed: 28940448

Auteurs

Francesco Ditonno (F)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Riccardo Bertolo (R)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. riccardogiuseppe.bertolo@univr.it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-0260-4601

Alessandro Veccia (A)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Sonia Costantino (S)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Francesca Montanaro (F)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Francesco Artoni (F)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Alberto Baielli (A)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Michele Boldini (M)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Davide Brusa (D)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Vincenzo De Marco (V)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Filippo Migliorini (F)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Antonio Benito Porcaro (AB)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Riccardo Rizzetto (R)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Maria Angela Cerruto (MA)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Riccardo Autorino (R)

Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Alessandro Antonelli (A)

Department of Urology, Borgo Trento Hospital, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, AUOI Verona, Piazzale Aristide Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.

Classifications MeSH