Efficacy and safety of higher oral doses of azaperone to achieve sedation in pigs.

behaviour biochemical indicators pharmacodynamics

Journal

Veterinarni medicina
ISSN: 0375-8427
Titre abrégé: Vet Med (Praha)
Pays: Czech Republic
ID NLM: 0063417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Historique:
received: 26 06 2022
accepted: 06 09 2022
medline: 11 10 2022
pubmed: 11 10 2022
entrez: 16 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study is to evaluate the possibility of achieving more effective and prolonged sedation in pigs by the oral administration of increased doses of azaperone and to evaluate its safety. This was performed through a prospective randomised and double blinded study. A total of 32 weaned piglets were divided into 4 groups (8 in each group). Group A was given 1 ml of saline orally and served as the control group. Group B received azaperone orally at a dose of 4 mg/kg b.w. Group C received azaperone orally at a dose of 8 mg/kg b.w. Group D was given azaperone orally at a dose of 12 mg/kg b.w. The response to the defined stimulus, movement level, degree of salivation, body temperature, respiratory frequency, blood plasma azaperone concentration and biochemical variables were included in the trial. We found that by increasing the dose of the orally administered azaperone, the onset of the sedation is faster, the end of the sedation starts later and the sedation time is longer. However, the use of higher doses of oral azaperone is not suitable for piglets because the doses negatively affect the respiratory rate, body temperature, some biochemical parameters and cause the immobility of the piglets.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38623478
doi: 10.17221/56/2022-VETMED
pii: 122056
pmc: PMC11016299
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

553-561

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2022 Svoboda et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Martin Svoboda (M)

Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jana Blahova (J)

Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Martin Hostovsky (M)

Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jiri Jarkovsky (J)

Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jakub Netolicky (J)

Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Patrik Predny (P)

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Ivana Simkova (I)

Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jonas Vanhara (J)

Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Jan Vasek (J)

Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH