Biosecurity indemnification and attitudes of United States swine producers towards the prevention of an african swine fever outbreak.

Biosecurity Indemnity Partial proportional odds model Swine producers

Journal

Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 21 05 2023
revised: 24 03 2024
accepted: 25 03 2024
medline: 17 4 2024
pubmed: 17 4 2024
entrez: 16 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Animal disease outbreaks, such as the recent outbreak of African Swine Fever in 2018, are a major concern for stakeholders across the food supply chain due to their potential to disrupt global food security, cause economic losses, and threaten animal welfare. As a result of their transboundary nature, discussions have shifted to preventive measures aimed at protecting livestock while ensuring food security and safety. Emergency assistance has been a critical response option during pandemics. However, this may not be sustainable in the long run because the expectation of government bailout may encourage risk taking behaviours. Our hypothesis is that an indemnity policy that is conditioned on showing biosecurity practices would increase compliance and reduce government expenditure during disease outbreaks. We developed and launched a survey from March to July 2022 targeted at swine producers across the US. From the survey, we examined livestock farmers' attitudes and intentions regarding biosecurity investment and assessed their attitudes towards the purchase of livestock insurance and reporting suspected infected livestock on their farm. We used a partial proportion odds model analysis to examine the model. Our analysis revealed that intention to call a veterinarian, trust in government agencies and risk perception of farmers were instrumental in the willingness to self-invest in biosecurity, purchase livestock insurance, and promptly report infected livestock on their farms. This provides evidence that biosecurity compliance would increase if indemnification was tied to a demonstration of effort to adopt biosecurity practices. We also show that individuals who have been in the industry for a longer period may become complacent and less likely to report outbreaks. Farmers with a higher share of income from their production operations bear a greater risk from their operational income and are more willing to report any suspected infections on their farms. The data suggest that motivating the willingness of farmers to invest in biosecurity while overcoming cost concerns is achievable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38626594
pii: S0167-5877(24)00079-5
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106193
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106193

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Richmond Silvanus Baye (RS)

University of Vermont, Community Development and Applied Economics, United States. Electronic address: rbaye@uvm.edu.

Asim Zia (A)

University of Vermont, Community Development and Applied Economics, United States. Electronic address: asim.zia@uvm.edu.

Scott C Merrill (SC)

University of Vermont, Department of Plant and Soil Science, United States.

Eric M Clark (EM)

University of Vermont, Department of Plant and Soil Science, United States. Electronic address: eric.clark@uvm.edu.

Christopher Koliba (C)

University of Kansas, School of Public Affairs and Administration, United States.

Julia M Smith (JM)

University of Vermont, Department of Animal Science, United States.

Classifications MeSH