From buds to shoots: insights into grapevine development from the Witch's Broom bud sport.
Vitis vinifera
Bud sport
Clonal propagation
Development
Grapevine
Somatic mutations
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Apr 2024
16 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
23
10
2023
accepted:
08
04
2024
medline:
17
4
2024
pubmed:
17
4
2024
entrez:
16
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Bud sports occur spontaneously in plants when new growth exhibits a distinct phenotype from the rest of the parent plant. The Witch's Broom bud sport occurs occasionally in various grapevine (Vitis vinifera) varieties and displays a suite of developmental defects, including dwarf features and reduced fertility. While it is highly detrimental for grapevine growers, it also serves as a useful tool for studying grapevine development. We used the Witch's Broom bud sport in grapevine to understand the developmental trajectories of the bud sports, as well as the potential genetic basis. We analyzed the phenotypes of two independent cases of the Witch's Broom bud sport, in the Dakapo and Merlot varieties of grapevine, alongside wild type counterparts. To do so, we quantified various shoot traits, performed 3D X-ray Computed Tomography on dormant buds, and landmarked leaves from the samples. We also performed Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing on the samples and called genetic variants using these sequencing datasets. The Dakapo and Merlot cases of Witch's Broom displayed severe developmental defects, with no fruit/clusters formed and dwarf vegetative features. However, the Dakapo and Merlot cases of Witch's Broom studied were also phenotypically different from one another, with distinct differences in bud and leaf development. We identified 968-974 unique genetic mutations in our two Witch's Broom cases that are potential causal variants of the bud sports. Examining gene function and validating these genetic candidates through PCR and Sanger-sequencing revealed one strong candidate mutation in Merlot Witch's Broom impacting the gene GSVIVG01008260001. The Witch's Broom bud sports in both varieties studied had dwarf phenotypes, but the two instances studied were also vastly different from one another and likely have distinct genetic bases. Future work on Witch's Broom bud sports in grapevine could provide more insight into development and the genetic pathways involved in grapevine.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Bud sports occur spontaneously in plants when new growth exhibits a distinct phenotype from the rest of the parent plant. The Witch's Broom bud sport occurs occasionally in various grapevine (Vitis vinifera) varieties and displays a suite of developmental defects, including dwarf features and reduced fertility. While it is highly detrimental for grapevine growers, it also serves as a useful tool for studying grapevine development. We used the Witch's Broom bud sport in grapevine to understand the developmental trajectories of the bud sports, as well as the potential genetic basis. We analyzed the phenotypes of two independent cases of the Witch's Broom bud sport, in the Dakapo and Merlot varieties of grapevine, alongside wild type counterparts. To do so, we quantified various shoot traits, performed 3D X-ray Computed Tomography on dormant buds, and landmarked leaves from the samples. We also performed Illumina and Oxford Nanopore sequencing on the samples and called genetic variants using these sequencing datasets.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The Dakapo and Merlot cases of Witch's Broom displayed severe developmental defects, with no fruit/clusters formed and dwarf vegetative features. However, the Dakapo and Merlot cases of Witch's Broom studied were also phenotypically different from one another, with distinct differences in bud and leaf development. We identified 968-974 unique genetic mutations in our two Witch's Broom cases that are potential causal variants of the bud sports. Examining gene function and validating these genetic candidates through PCR and Sanger-sequencing revealed one strong candidate mutation in Merlot Witch's Broom impacting the gene GSVIVG01008260001.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Witch's Broom bud sports in both varieties studied had dwarf phenotypes, but the two instances studied were also vastly different from one another and likely have distinct genetic bases. Future work on Witch's Broom bud sports in grapevine could provide more insight into development and the genetic pathways involved in grapevine.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38627633
doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04992-y
pii: 10.1186/s12870-024-04992-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
283Subventions
Organisme : Division of Integrative Organismal Systems
ID : IOS-2310355, IOS-2310356, and IOS-2310357
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : MICL02572
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Foster TM, Aranzana MJ. Attention sports fans! The far-reaching contributions of bud sport mutants to horticulture and plant biology. Hortic Res. 2018;5:44.
pubmed: 30038785
pmcid: 6046048
doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0062-x
Carbonell-Bejerano P, Royo C, Torres-Pérez R, Grimplet J, Fernandez L, Franco-Zorrilla JM, et al. Catastrophic Unbalanced Genome rearrangements cause somatic loss of Berry Color in Grapevine. Plant Physiol. 2017;175:786–801.
pubmed: 28811336
pmcid: 5619900
doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00715
Gerrath J, Posluszny U, Melville L. Taming the wild grape: Botany and Horticulture in the Vitaceae. Springer; 2015.
Srinivasan C, Mullins MG. Physiology of flowering in the Grapevine — a review. Am J Enol Vitic. 1981;32:47–63.
doi: 10.5344/ajev.1981.32.1.47
Cheng C, Jiao C, Singer SD, Gao M, Xu X, Zhou Y, et al. Gibberellin-induced changes in the transcriptome of grapevine (Vitis labrusca × V. vinifera) cv. Kyoho flowers. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:128.
pubmed: 25888129
pmcid: 4348105
doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1324-8
Bettiga LJ, Smith RJ, Peacock WL, Hembree KJ, Weber EA, Verdegaal PS. Abiotic disorders and injuries of Grapevine. In: Bettiga LJ, editor. Grape Pest Management Third Edition. Oakland, California: University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources; 2013. pp. 29–46.
Jung HY. Candidatus Phytoplasma Castaneae, a novel phytoplasma taxon associated with chestnut witches’ broom disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:1543–9.
Khan AJ, Botti S, Al-Subhi AM, Gundersen-Rindal DE, Bertaccini AF. Molecular identification of a new phytoplasma associated with alfalfa witches’-broom in oman. Phytopathology. 2002;92:1038–47.
pubmed: 18944213
doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.10.1038
Montano HG, Davis RE, Dally EL, Hogenhout S, Pimentel JP, Brioso PS. Candidatus Phytoplasma brasiliense’, a new phytoplasma taxon associated with hibiscus witches’ broom disease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51(3):1109–18.
Zhuk E, Vasilyeva G, Goroshkevich S. Witches’ broom and normal crown clones from the same trees of Pinus sibirica: a comparative morphological study. Trees. 2015;29:1079–90.
Bryson AE, Wilson Brown M, Mullins J, Dong W, Bahmani K, Bornowski N, et al. Composite modeling of leaf shape along shoots discriminates Vitis species better than individual leaves. Appl Plant Sci. 2020;8:e11404.
pubmed: 33344095
pmcid: 7742203
doi: 10.1002/aps3.11404
Abramoff, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 2004;11:36–42.
Meister ALF. Generalia de genesi figurarum planarum et inde pendentibus earum affectionibus. 1769.
Chitwood DH, Mullins J, Migicovsky Z, Frank M, VanBuren R, Londo JP. Vein-to-blade ratio is an allometric indicator of leaf size and plasticity. Am J Bot. 2021;108:571–9.
pubmed: 33901305
pmcid: 8252563
doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1639
Dryden IL, Mardia KV. Statistical shape analysis: with applications in R. Wiley; 2016.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 20 September 2023.
RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Posit Software. https://posit.co/products/open-source/rstudio/ . Accessed 20 September 2023.
Wickham H. Programming with ggplot2. In: Wickham H, editor. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016. pp. 241–53.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4_12
Wilke CO. cowplot: streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ggplot2. R package version 1.1.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cowplot . Accessed 20 September 2023.
Constantin AE, Patil I. ggsignif: R package for displaying significance brackets for ggplot2. PsyArxiv. 2021.
Campitelli E. ggnewscale: Multiple Fill and Colour Scales in’ggplot2’. R package version 0.4.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggnewscale . Accessed 20 September 2023.
Porebski S, Bailey LG, Baum BR. Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 1997;15:8–15.
doi: 10.1007/BF02772108
Urich MA, Nery JR, Lister R, Schmitz RJ, Ecker JR. MethylC-seq library preparation for base-resolution whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:475–83.
pubmed: 25692984
pmcid: 4465251
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.114
Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 2011;17:10–2.
doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200
Andrews S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc . Accessed 18 October 2023.
Canaguier A, Grimplet J, Di Gaspero G, Scalabrin S, Duchêne E, Choisne N, et al. A new version of the grapevine reference genome assembly (12X.v2) and of its annotation (VCost.v3). Genom Data. 2017;14:56–62.
pubmed: 28971018
pmcid: 5612791
doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2017.09.002
Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.
pubmed: 19451168
pmcid: 2705234
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324
Danecek P, Bonfield JK, Liddle J, Marshall J, Ohan V, Pollard MO et al. Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience. 2021;10.
Broad Institute. Picard Toolkit. Broad Institute. https://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/ . Accessed 20 September 2023.
McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, et al. The genome analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297–303.
pubmed: 20644199
pmcid: 2928508
doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110
DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011;43:491–8.
pubmed: 21478889
pmcid: 3083463
doi: 10.1038/ng.806
Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11.10.1–11.10.33.
Caetano-Anolles D. Hard-filtering germline short variants. GATK. https://gatk.broadinstitute.org/hc/en-us/articles/360035890471-Hard-filtering-germline-short-variants . Accessed 16 Feb 2024.
Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:e164.
pubmed: 20601685
pmcid: 2938201
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603
Jaillon O, Aury J-M, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007;449:463–7.
pubmed: 17721507
doi: 10.1038/nature06148
Shumate A, Salzberg SL. Liftoff: accurate mapping of gene annotations. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:1639–43.
pubmed: 33320174
pmcid: 8289374
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1016
Qiagen. QIAGEN® Genomic DNA Handbook. 2015.
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb Genom. 2017;3:e000132.
pubmed: 29177090
pmcid: 5695209
De Coster W, D’Hert S, Schultz DT, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2666–9.
pubmed: 29547981
pmcid: 6061794
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149
Li H. New strategies to improve minimap2 alignment accuracy. Bioinformatics. 2021;37:4572–4.
pubmed: 34623391
pmcid: 8652018
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab705
Smolka M, Paulin LF, Grochowski CM, Horner DW, Mahmoud M, Behera S, et al. Detection of mosaic and population-level structural variants with Sniffles2. Nat Biotechnol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-023-02024-y .
doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-02024-y
pubmed: 38253882
Pacific Biosciences. pbsv. https://github.com/PacificBiosciences/pbsv . Accessed 20 September 2023.
Jeffares DC, Jolly C, Hoti M, Speed D, Shaw L, Rallis C, et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14061.
pubmed: 28117401
pmcid: 5286201
doi: 10.1038/ncomms14061
Cingolani P, Patel VM, Coon M, Nguyen T, Land SJ, Ruden DM, et al. Using Drosophila melanogaster as a model for Genotoxic Chemical Mutational Studies with a New Program, SnpSift. Front Genet. 2012;3:35.
pubmed: 22435069
pmcid: 3304048
doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00035
Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841–2.
pubmed: 20110278
pmcid: 2832824
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60.
pubmed: 25402007
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176
Cheng C-Y, Krishnakumar V, Chan AP, Thibaud-Nissen F, Schobel S, Town CD. Araport11: a complete reannotation of the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome. Plant J. 2017;89:789–804.
pubmed: 27862469
doi: 10.1111/tpj.13415
Durinck S, Spellman PT, Birney E, Huber W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:1184–91.
pubmed: 19617889
pmcid: 3159387
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.97
Bolser D, Staines DM, Pritchard E, Kersey P. Ensembl plants: integrating tools for visualizing, Mining, and Analyzing Plant Genomics Data. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1374:115–40.
pubmed: 26519403
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_6
Chitwood DH, Rundell SM, Li DY, Woodford QL, Yu TT, Lopez JR, et al. Climate and Developmental plasticity: interannual variability in Grapevine Leaf morphology. Plant Physiol. 2016;170:1480–91.
pubmed: 26826220
pmcid: 4775139
doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01825
Forcato C. Gene prediction and functional annotation in the Vitis vinifera genome. Università degli studi di Padova; 2010.
Fasoli M, Silvia Dal Santo, Zenoni S, Giovanni Battista Tornielli, Farina L, Zamboni A, et al. The Grapevine expression Atlas reveals a deep transcriptome shift driving the entire plant into a Maturation Program. Plant Cell. 2012;24(9):3489–505.
pubmed: 22948079
pmcid: 3480284
doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.100230
Falbel TG, Koch LM, Nadeau JA, Segui-Simarro JM, Sack FD, Bednarek SY. SCD1 is required for cytokinesis and polarized cell expansion in Arabidopsis thaliana [corrected]. Development. 2003;130:4011–24.
pubmed: 12874123
doi: 10.1242/dev.00619
Riaz S, Garrison KE, Dangl GS, Boursiquot J-M, Meredith CP. Genetic divergence and chimerism within ancient asexually propagated Winegrape cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 2002;127.
Franks T, Botta R, Thomas MR, Franks J. Chimerism in grapevines: implications for cultivar identity, ancestry and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;104:192–9.
pubmed: 12582686
doi: 10.1007/s001220100683
Frank MH, Chitwood DH. Plant chimeras: the good, the bad, and the Bizzaria. Dev Biol. 2016;419:41–53.
pubmed: 27381079
doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.07.003
Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi S-E, Kok S-Y, Sarpan N, et al. Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature. 2015;525:533–7.
pubmed: 26352475
pmcid: 4857894
doi: 10.1038/nature15365
Vondras AM, Minio A, Blanco-Ulate B, Figueroa-Balderas R, Penn MA, Zhou Y, et al. The genomic diversification of grapevine clones. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:972.
pubmed: 31830913
pmcid: 6907202
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6211-2
Urra C, Sanhueza D, Pavez C, Tapia P, Núñez-Lillo G, Minio A et al. Identification of grapevine clones via high-throughput amplicon sequencing: a proof-of-concept study. G3. 2023;13.
Gambino G, Dal Molin A, Boccacci P, Minio A, Chitarra W, Avanzato CG, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and SNV genotyping of Nebbiolo (Vitis vinifera L.) clones. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17294.
pubmed: 29229917
pmcid: 5725591
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17405-y
Calderón L, Mauri N, Muñoz C, Carbonell-Bejerano P, Bree L, Bergamin D, et al. Whole genome resequencing and custom genotyping unveil clonal lineages in Malbec grapevines (Vitis vinifera L). Sci Rep. 2021;11:7775.
pubmed: 33833358
pmcid: 8032709
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87445-y
Sichel V, Sarah G, Girollet N, Laucou V, Roux C, Roques M, et al. Chimeras in merlot grapevine revealed by phased assembly. BMC Genomics. 2023;24:396.
pubmed: 37452318
pmcid: 10347889
doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09453-8
Hofmeister BT, Denkena J, Colomé-Tatché M, Shahryary Y, Hazarika R, Grimwood J, et al. A genome assembly and the somatic genetic and epigenetic mutation rate in a wild long-lived perennial Populus trichocarpa. Genome Biol. 2020;21:259.
Yu L, Boström C, Franzenburg S, Bayer T, Dagan T, Reusch TBH. Somatic genetic drift and multilevel selection in a clonal seagrass. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4:952–62.
pubmed: 32393866
doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1196-4
Campos G, Chialva C, Miras S, Lijavetzky D. New Technologies and strategies for grapevine breeding through Genetic Transformation. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:767522.
pubmed: 34899790
pmcid: 8655788
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.767522