Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and immediate invasive assessment in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a long-term follow-up of the Prague OHCA trial.

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation Long-term Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Quality of life

Journal

Critical care (London, England)
ISSN: 1466-609X
Titre abrégé: Crit Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 08 02 2024
accepted: 03 04 2024
medline: 17 4 2024
pubmed: 17 4 2024
entrez: 16 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach. The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment). From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3). Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Randomized data evaluating the impact of the extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) approach on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are lacking. The objective of this follow-up study was to assess the long-term clinical outcomes of the ECPR-based versus CCPR approach.
METHODS METHODS
The Prague OHCA trial was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with witnessed refractory OHCA of presumed cardiac origin, without return of spontaneous circulation, were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene to conventional CPR (CCPR) or an ECPR-based approach (intra-arrest transport, ECPR if ROSC is not achieved prehospital and immediate invasive assessment).
RESULTS RESULTS
From March 2013 to October 2020, 264 patients were randomized during ongoing resuscitation on scene, and 256 patients were enrolled. Long-term follow-up was performed 5.3 (interquartile range 3.8-7.2) years after initial randomization and was completed in 255 of 256 patients (99.6%). In total, 34/123 (27.6%) patients in the ECPR-based group and 26/132 (19.7%) in the CCPR group were alive (log-rank P = 0.01). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the neurological outcome, survival after hospital discharge, risk of hospitalization, major cardiovascular events and quality of life. Of long-term survivors, 1/34 (2.9%) in the ECPR-based arm and 1/26 (3.8%) in the CCPR arm had poor neurological outcome (both patients had a cerebral performance category score of 3).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with refractory OHCA, the ECPR-based approach significantly improved long-term survival. There were no differences in the neurological outcome, major cardiovascular events and quality of life between the groups, but the trial was possibly underpowered to detect a clinically relevant difference in these outcomes. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01511666, Registered 19 January 2012.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38627823
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04901-7
pii: 10.1186/s13054-024-04901-7
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01511666']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

125

Subventions

Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
ID : MH CZ - DRO - VFN00064165
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine
Organisme : Univerzita Karlova v Praze
ID : Cooperatio - Intensive Care Medicine

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Gräsner JT, Herlitz J, Tjelmeland IB, Wnent J, Masterson S, Lilja G, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines: epidemiology of cardiac arrest in Europe. Resuscitation. 2021;161:61–79.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.007 pubmed: 33773833
Belohlavek J, Smalcova J, Rob D, Franek O, Smid O, Pokorna M, et al. Effect of intra-arrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and immediate invasive assessment and treatment on functional neurologic outcome in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(8):737–47.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.1025 pubmed: 35191923 pmcid: 8864504
Yannopoulos D, Bartos J, Raveendran G, Walser E, Connett J, Murray TA, et al. Advanced reperfusion strategies for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and refractory ventricular fibrillation (ARREST): a phase 2, single centre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10265):1807–16.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32338-2 pubmed: 33197396 pmcid: 7856571
Lunz D, Calabrò L, Belliato M, Contri E, Broman LM, Scandroglio AM, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest: a retrospective multicenter study. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:973–82.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05926-6 pubmed: 32052069
Abrams D, MacLaren G, Lorusso R, Price S, Yannopoulos D, Vercaemst L, et al. Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications. Intensive Care Med. 2022;48(1):1–15.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06514-y pubmed: 34505911
Belohlavek J, Yannopoulos D, Smalcova J, Rob D, Bartos J, Huptych M, et al. Intraarrest transport, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and early invasive management in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: an individual patient data pooled analysis of two randomised trials. EClinicalMedicine 2023;59.
Rob D, Smalcova J, Smid O, Kral A, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, et al. Extracorporeal versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a secondary analysis of the Prague OHCA trial. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):1–9.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04199-3
Suverein MM, Delnoij TS, Lorusso R, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Otterspoor L, Elzo Kraemer CV, et al. Early extracorporeal CPR for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(4):299–309.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204511 pubmed: 36720132
Alexy T, Kalra R, Kosmopoulos M, Bartos JA, Elliott A, Gutierrez Bernal A, et al. Initial hospital length of stay and long-term survival of patients successfully resuscitated using extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2023;12(3):175–83.
doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac141 pubmed: 36346080
Spangenberg T, Schewel J, Dreher A, Meincke F, Bahlmann E, van der Schalk H, et al. Health related quality of life after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2018;127:73–8.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.03.036 pubmed: 29626610
Belohlavek J, Kucera K, Jarkovsky J, Franek O, Pokorna M, Danda J, et al. Hyperinvasive approach to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using mechanical chest compression device, prehospital intraarrest cooling, extracorporeal life support and early invasive assessment compared to standard of care. A randomized parallel groups comparative study proposal. J Transl Med. 2012;10(1):1–13.
doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-163
Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet. 1975;305(7905):480–4.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(75)92830-5
Van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, Van Gijn J. Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke. 1988;19(5):604–7.
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.19.5.604 pubmed: 3363593
R Core Team. R (2023): A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/ .
Mørk SR, Bøtker MT, Christensen S, Tang M, Terkelsen CJ. Survival and neurological outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with and without mechanical circulatory support. Resuscitation plus. 2022;10: 100230.
doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2022.100230 pubmed: 35434669 pmcid: 9010695
Dankiewicz J, Cronberg T, Lilja G, Jakobsen JC, Levin H, Ullén S, et al. Hypothermia versus normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(24):2283–94.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100591 pubmed: 34133859
Kim YJ, Ahn S, Sohn CH, Seo DW, Lee YS, Lee JH, et al. Long-term neurological outcomes in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2016;101:1–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.01.004 pubmed: 26826564
Lim C, Verfaellie M, Schnyer D, Lafleche G, Alexander MP. Recovery, long-term cognitive outcome and quality of life following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(7):691.
doi: 10.2340/16501977-1816 pubmed: 24849762
Raina KD, Rittenberger JC, Holm MB, Callaway CW. Functional outcomes: one year after a cardiac arrest. BioMed Res Int 2015;2015.
Andrew E, Nehme Z, Bernard S, Smith K. The influence of comorbidity on survival and long-term outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2017;110:42–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.10.018 pubmed: 27816529
Yannopoulos D, Bartos JA, Raveendran G, Conterato M, Frascone RJ, Trembley A, et al. Coronary artery disease in patients with out-of-hospital refractory ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70(9):1109–17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.06.059 pubmed: 28838358
Rob D, Kavalkova P, Smalcova J, Kral A, Kovarnik T, Zemanek D, et al. Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiac arrest patients without return of spontaneous circulation. Resuscitation. 2022;175:133–41.
doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.03.027 pubmed: 35367316

Auteurs

Daniel Rob (D)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Klaudia Farkasovska (K)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Marketa Kreckova (M)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Ondrej Smid (O)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Petra Kavalkova (P)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Jaromir Macoun (J)

Department of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Michal Huptych (M)

Czech Institute of Informatics, Robotics and Cybernetics (CIIRC), Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.

Petra Havrankova (P)

Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Juraj Gallo (J)

Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.

Jan Pudil (J)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Milan Dusik (M)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Stepan Havranek (S)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Ales Linhart (A)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic.

Jan Belohlavek (J)

2nd Department of Medicine, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 00, Prague 2, Czech Republic. jan.belohlavek@vfn.cz.

Classifications MeSH