60 Years of the 3Rs symposium: Lessons learned and the road ahead.

3R principle 3Rs Russell & Burch alternatives to animal experimentation history new approach methodologies (NAMs)

Journal

ALTEX
ISSN: 1868-8551
Titre abrégé: ALTEX
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 100953980

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 06 03 2024
medline: 17 4 2024
pubmed: 17 4 2024
entrez: 17 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

When The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique was published in 1959, authors William Russell and Rex Burch had a modest goal: to make researchers think about what they were doing in the laboratory - and to do it more humanely. Sixty years later, their groundbreaking book was celebrated for inspiring a revolution in science and launching a new field: The 3Rs of alternatives to animal experimentation. On November 22, 2019, some pioneering and leading scientists and researchers in the field gathered at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Bal-timore for the 60 Years of the 3Rs Symposium: Lessons Learned and the Road Ahead. The event was sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), the Foundation for Chemistry Research and Initiatives, the Alternative Research & Development Foundation (ARDF), the American Cleaning Institute (ACI), the International Fragrance Association (IFRA), the Institute for In Vitro Sciences (IIVS), John "Jack" R. Fowle III, and the Society of Toxicology (SoT). Fourteen pres-entations shared the history behind the groundbreaking publication, international efforts to achieve its aims, stumbling blocks to progress, as well as remarkable achievements. The day was a tribute to Russell and Burch, and a testament to what is possible when people from many walks of life - science, government, and industry - work toward a common goal. William Russell and Rex Burch published their book The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique in 1959. The book encouraged researchers to replace animal experiments where it was possible, to refine experiments with animals in order to reduce their suffering, and to reduce the number of animals that had to be used for experiments to the minimum. Sixty years later, a group of pioneering and leading scientists and researchers in the field gathered to share how the publi­cation came about and how the vision inspired international collaborations and successes on many different levels including new laws. The paper includes an overview of important milestones in the history of alternatives to animal experimentation.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
William Russell and Rex Burch published their book The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique in 1959. The book encouraged researchers to replace animal experiments where it was possible, to refine experiments with animals in order to reduce their suffering, and to reduce the number of animals that had to be used for experiments to the minimum. Sixty years later, a group of pioneering and leading scientists and researchers in the field gathered to share how the publi­cation came about and how the vision inspired international collaborations and successes on many different levels including new laws. The paper includes an overview of important milestones in the history of alternatives to animal experimentation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38629803
doi: 10.14573/altex.2403061
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

179-201

Auteurs

Michael Balls (M)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

Rolf Bass (R)

Charité - University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

Rodger Curren (R)

Institute for In Vitro Sciences, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

Julia Fentem (J)

Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Bedfordshire, UK.

Alan Goldberg (A)

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Thomas Hartung (T)

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Doerenkamp-Zbinden-Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, Baltimore, MD, USA.
CAAT-Europe, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.

Kathrin Herrmann (K)

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Nicole C Kleinstreuer (NC)

National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Lisa Libowitz (L)

Baltimore, MD, USA.

John Parascandola (J)

Bethesda, MD, USA.

Andrew Rowan (A)

Wellbeing International, Potomac, MD, USA.

Horst Spielmann (H)

Institut für Pharmazie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Martin L Stephens (ML)

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Russell S Thomas (RS)

Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Katya Tsaioun (K)

Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Classifications MeSH