Three-dimensional Versus Two-dimensional Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
2D laparoscopy
3D laparoscopy
Gastric By-pass
Sleeve gastrectomy
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2024
17 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
05
02
2024
accepted:
10
04
2024
revised:
30
03
2024
medline:
17
4
2024
pubmed:
17
4
2024
entrez:
17
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy has several advantages in gastrointestinal surgery. This systematic review determined whether similar benefits exist for bariatric surgical procedures by systematically searching the MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases. Six studies including 629 patients who underwent 2D (386) and 3D (243) laparoscopic bariatric surgeries were selected. Operative time was significantly shorter in patients undergoing 3D laparoscopic gastric bypass (pooled standardized mean difference [SMD] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.22-0.15). Similarly, a shorter hospital stay was detected both during sleeve gastrectomy (SMD 0.42, 95% CI 0.70-0.13) and gastric bypass (SMD 0.39, 95% CI 0.64-0.14) with 3D laparoscopy. The study showed the potential benefit of 3D imaging in preventing intra- and postoperative complications. Despite the limited evidence, surgeons may benefit from 3D laparoscopy during bariatric surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38630144
doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07222-4
pii: 10.1007/s11695-024-07222-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, et al. The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(10):3251–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x
pubmed: 30515610
Mongelli F, Regina D, Garofalo F, et al. Three-dimensional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with totally hand-sewn anastomoses for morbid obesity. A single center experience. Acta Cir Bras. 2020;35(8):e202000806. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020200080000006 .
doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200080000006
pubmed: 32901683
pmcid: 7478489
Cheng J, Gao J, Shuai X, et al. Two-dimensional versus three-dimensional laparoscopy in surgical efficacy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2016;7(43):70979–90. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.10916 .
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10916
pubmed: 27486967
pmcid: 5342603
Tey HTV, Foo SMJ, Fong SS, et al. Short Term Postoperative and Oncological Outcomes of Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(12):1350–3. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2020.0093 .
doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0093
pubmed: 32522084
Patankar SB, Padasalagi GR. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopy in urology: A randomized study. Indian. J Urol. 2017;33(3):226–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/iju.IJU_418_16 .
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_418_16
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
pubmed: 19621072
pmcid: 2707599
Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al (2011) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available at: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp . Accessed 20 Dic 2023.
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. 1996;17:1–12.
doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(95)00134-4
pubmed: 8721797
Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the Mean and Variance from the Median, Range, and the Size of a Sample. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005;5:13.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-13
pubmed: 15840177
pmcid: 1097734
Currò G, La Malfa G, Caizzone A, et al. Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Obes Surg. 2015;25(11):2120–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1674-y .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1674-y
pubmed: 25893652
Gabrielli ME, Saun TJ, Jung JJ, et al. Assessment of 3-Dimensional vs 2-Dimensional Imaging and Technical Performance Using a Multiport Intraoperative Data Capture and Analytic System for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1920084. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20084 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20084
pubmed: 31995217
pmcid: 6991293
Martínez-Ubieto F, Aragón-Benedí C, Barranco-Dominguez I, et al. Perioperative Medicine of Aragón Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón). Laparoscopic surgery in 3D improves results and surgeon convenience in sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2022;407(8):3333–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02681-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02681-8
Rojano-Rodríguez M, Torres-Ruíz M, Cuendis-Velazquez A, et al. Three-dimensional vs two-dimensional laparoscopic gastric bypass for manual gastrojejunal anastomosis: A prospective and randomized trial. Cir Cir. 2020;88(2):170–4. English. https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.19001064 .
doi: 10.24875/CIRU.19001064
pubmed: 32116321
Padin EM, Santos RS, Fernández SG, et al. Impact of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopy in a Bariatric Surgery Program: Influence in the Learning Curve. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2552–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2687-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2687-5
pubmed: 28456885
Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classifcation of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518–26.
pubmed: 1598671
de Menezes Ettinger JE, dos Santos Filho PV, Azaro E, et al. Prevention of rhabdomyolysis in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2005;15:874–9.
doi: 10.1381/0960892054222669
pubmed: 15978162
Qaseem A, Snow V, Fittermann N, et al. Risk assessment for and strategies to reduce perioperative pulmonary complications for patients undergoing noncardiothoracic surgery: a guideline from the American College of Physician. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:575–80.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00008
pubmed: 16618955
Narani KK. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism—prevention, management, and anaesthetics consideration. Indian J Anaesth. 2010;54(1):8–17.
doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.60490
pubmed: 20532065
pmcid: 2876903
Khorgami Z, Aminian A, Shoar S, et al. Cost of bariatric surgery and factors associated with increased cost: an analysis of national inpatient sample. Surg Obes Relat Dis: Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2017;13(8):1284e1289.
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.04.010
Toh HJ, Lim ZY, Yap P, et al. Factors associated with prolonged length of stay in older patients. Singapore Med J. 2017;58(3):134e138.
doi: 10.11622/smedj.2016158
Lois A, Frelich M, Sahr N, et al. The relationship between length of stay and readmissions in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery. 2015;158(2):501e507.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.051
Wang Z, Liang J, Chen J, et al. Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(10):2883–7. https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2883 .
doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2883
pubmed: 33112544
pmcid: 7798154
Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, et al. 3D HD versus 2d HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1454–60.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9
pubmed: 22179446
Currò G, La Malfa G, Lazzara S, et al. Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is surgeon experience relevant? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25(7):566–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0641 .
doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0641
pubmed: 26076180
EuroSurg Collaborative. Safety of hospital discharge before return of bowel function after elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2020;107(5):552–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11422 .
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11422
Cicione A, Autorino R, Laguna MP, et al. Three-dimensional Technology Facilitates Surgical Performance of Novice Laparoscopy Surgeons: A Quantitative Assessment on a Porcine Kidney Model. Urology. 2015;85:1252–6.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.009
pubmed: 26099869
Zhou J, Xu HJ, Liang CZ, et al. A Comparative Study of Distinct Ocular Symptoms After Performing Laparoscopic Surgical Tasks Using a Three-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System and a Conventional Two-Dimensional Surgical Imaging System. J Endourol. 2015;29:816–20.
doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0759
pubmed: 25669315
Chan AC, Chung SC, Yim AP, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:438–40.
doi: 10.1007/s004649900385
pubmed: 9153170