Exploring Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion-Related Pedagogy Across Different Professions.


Journal

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
ISSN: 1938-808X
Titre abrégé: Acad Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8904605

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 17 4 2024
pubmed: 17 4 2024
entrez: 17 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) have become an important priority for academic medicine. However, several barriers challenge the effective implementation of DEI-related pedagogy. An exploration of the barriers to and enablers of DEI-related pedagogy-as they relate to professional contexts-can inform how to advance DEI in medical education. Shulman's notion of signature pedagogies offers a foundation for understanding and exploring the influence of such contexts on teaching and learning. Comparisons across professions may help make signature pedagogies more visible and may facilitate change. In this study, the authors aim to explore how the professional contexts of medicine, nursing, and teacher education approach DEI-related pedagogy. The authors conducted a qualitative exploratory study using constructivist grounded theory methodology. Using both purposive and theoretical sampling, 24 participants from across the United States and Canada were interviewed, including physicians, nurses, and K-12 teachers in practice as well as professional educators in each discipline (May-December 2022). Interviews included a case-based elicitation approach, and data were analyzed iteratively across the data collection period using constant comparative analysis. Medicine and nursing tend to prioritize objectivity and seek to avoid or neutralize emotions that are intrinsic to DEI-related learning, view DEI expertise as being outside the purview of their profession, and view time for DEI as limited in a clinical learning environment. In contrast, teaching is built on the assumption that DEI expertise is co-constructed and inclusive of community voices and lived experiences. DEI-related pedagogy in teaching allowed for exploration of deep assumptions and learning about structural inequities. Findings suggest that assumptions and values held in professions, such as medicine and nursing, that valorize objectivity and neutrality, while stigmatizing vulnerability and suppressing emotions, may constrain DEI-related teaching and learning in such contexts.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38630442
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005741
pii: 00001888-990000000-00840
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Auteurs

Javeed Sukhera (J)

J. Sukhera is chair/chief of psychiatry, Hartford Hospital and Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut.

Erin Kennedy (E)

E. Kennedy is faculty lead, site coordinator, and lecturer, Primary Health Care Nurse Practitioner Program, Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, and a PhD candidate, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Michael Panza (M)

M. Panza is research associate, Centre for Education Research and Innovation, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Susan Rodger (S)

S. Rodger is professor and psychologist, Faculty of Education, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Chris Watling (C)

C. Watling is professor and director, Centre for Education Research and Innovation, and vice dean (acting) for education scholarship and strategy, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Classifications MeSH