Three-Year Outcomes of Oral Antibiotics vs Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of the APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA surgery
ISSN: 2168-6262
Titre abrégé: JAMA Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101589553
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2024
17 Apr 2024
Historique:
pmc-release:
17
04
2025
medline:
17
4
2024
pubmed:
17
4
2024
entrez:
17
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Current short-term evidence has shown that uncomplicated acute appendicitis can be treated successfully with oral antibiotics alone, but longer-term results are lacking. To assess the treatment effectiveness of oral antibiotic monotherapy compared with combined intravenous (IV) and oral antibiotics in computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis at a longer-term follow-up. This secondary analysis of a predefined year 3 follow-up of the Appendicitis Acuta II (APPAC II) noninferiority, multicenter randomized clinical trial compared oral moxifloxacin with combined IV ertapenem plus oral levofloxacin and metronidazole for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The trial was conducted at 9 university and central hospitals in Finland from April 2017 to November 2018, with the last follow-up in November 2022. Participants included patients aged 18 to 60 years, who were randomized to receive either oral antibiotics monotherapy (n = 301) or combined IV and oral antibiotics (n = 298). Antibiotics monotherapy consisted of oral moxifloxacin, 400 mg/d, for 7 days. Combined IV and oral antibiotics consisted of IV ertapenem sodium, 1 g/d, for 2 days plus oral levofloxacin, 500 mg/d, and metronidazole, 500 mg 3 times/d, for 5 days. The primary end point was treatment success, defined as the resolution of acute appendicitis and discharge from hospital without the need for surgical intervention and no appendicitis recurrence at the year 3 follow-up evaluated using a noninferiority design. The secondary end points included late (after 1 year) appendicitis recurrence as well as treatment-related adverse events, quality of life, length of hospital stay, and length of sick leave, which were evaluated using a superiority design. After exclusions, 599 patients (mean [SD] age, 36 [12] years; 336 males [56.1%]) were randomized; after withdrawal and loss to follow-up, 582 patients (99.8%) were available for the year 3 follow-up. The treatment success at year 3 was 63.4% (1-sided 95% CI, 58.8% to ∞) in the oral antibiotic monotherapy group and 65.2% (1-sided 95% CI, 60.5% to ∞) in the combined IV and oral antibiotics group. The difference in treatment success rate between the groups at year 3 was -1.8 percentage points (1-sided 95% CI, -8.3 percentage points to ∞; P = .14 for noninferiority), with the CI limit exceeding the noninferiority margin. There were no significant differences between groups in treatment-related adverse events, quality of life, length of hospital stay, or length of sick leave. This secondary analysis of the APPAC II trial found a slightly higher appendectomy rate in patients who received oral antibiotic monotherapy; however, noninferiority of oral antibiotic monotherapy compared with combined IV and oral antibiotics could not be demonstrated. The results encourage future studies to assess oral antibiotic monotherapy as a viable treatment alternative for uncomplicated acute appendicitis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03236961.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38630471
pii: 2817651
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5947
pmc: PMC11024776
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03236961']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
BMC Surg. 2013 Feb 08;13:3
pubmed: 23394263
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Jul;70(1):1-11.e9
pubmed: 27974169
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362
pubmed: 33427870
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869
pubmed: 20332511
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1355-1361
pubmed: 28677879
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):283-289
pubmed: 32074268
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 14;17(10):e0276007
pubmed: 36240181
BMC Surg. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):117
pubmed: 30558607
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Jul;19(4):579-591
pubmed: 33527304
BJS Open. 2021 Jul 6;5(4):
pubmed: 34355241
Br J Surg. 2016 May;103(6):656-667
pubmed: 26990957
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220202
pubmed: 31344073
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8
pubmed: 26080338
Ann Surg. 2021 Aug 1;274(2):240-247
pubmed: 33534226
JAMA Surg. 2021 Dec 1;156(12):1179-1181
pubmed: 34613361
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 24;22(1):170
pubmed: 36280806
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2411
pubmed: 28050666
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265
pubmed: 30264120
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27
pubmed: 32295644
BJS Open. 2022 Jul 7;6(4):
pubmed: 35971796
Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9
pubmed: 21550483
Arch Surg. 2011 Mar;146(3):308-14
pubmed: 21422362
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):
pubmed: 34444222
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Int J Surg. 2021 Nov;95:106148
pubmed: 34700020
JAMA Surg. 2018 May 1;153(5):471-478
pubmed: 29322168
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 16;385(25):2395-2397
pubmed: 34694761
Lancet. 2015 Sep 26;386(10000):1278-1287
pubmed: 26460662
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Br J Surg. 2022 May 16;109(6):503-509
pubmed: 35576384
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Mar;46(3):948-959
pubmed: 32914350
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220039
pubmed: 35796152
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
JAMA Surg. 2023 Oct 1;158(10):1105-1106
pubmed: 37556160