Longitudinal changes in optic disc cupping from the baseline in chiasmal lesion optic neuropathy and glaucoma.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 04 2024
17 04 2024
Historique:
received:
30
11
2023
accepted:
10
04
2024
medline:
19
4
2024
pubmed:
18
4
2024
entrez:
17
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to investigate the changes in cupping in chiasmal lesion optic neuropathy (chON) compared to baseline optic disc and glaucoma. We used a novel study design to enroll patients who had fundus photographs incidentally taken during routine health check-ups prior to the onset of optic neuropathy. In 31 eyes (21 patients) with chON and 33 eyes (30 patients) with glaucoma, we investigated the change in cup-to-disc (C/D) area from the baseline to overt cupping using flicker analysis. Compared to the baseline, 23 eyes (74.2%) had increased cup size and 3 (9.7%) had vascular configuration changes in the chONgroup; in contrast, all glaucoma eyes exhibited changes in cup size and vascular configuration. The increase in C/D area ratio was significantly smaller in chON (0.04 ± 0.04) compared to glaucoma (0.10 ± 0.04, P < 0.001); the minimum residual neuroretinal rim width showed a more pronounced difference (29.7 ± 8.2% vs 7.1 ± 3.9%, P < 0.001). The changes distributed predominantly towards the nasal direction in chON, contrasting the changes to the arcuate fibers in glaucoma. In conclusion, our results provide the first longitudinal evidence of true pathological cupping in chONcompared to photographically disease-free baseline. The marked difference in the residual minimum rim width reaffirms the importance of rim obliteration in the differential diagnosis between the two diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38632299
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59419-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-59419-3
pmc: PMC11024126
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8889Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Am J Ophthalmol. 1977 Jul;84(1):98-103
pubmed: 900224
Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1516-23
pubmed: 24725827
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):2
pubmed: 28073365
Acta Ophthalmol. 2011 Aug;89(5):e428-33
pubmed: 21332674
Ophthalmology. 1995 Mar;102(3):436-40
pubmed: 7891982
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988 Jul;29(7):1151-8
pubmed: 3417404
Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Jun;98(6):1046-50
pubmed: 7387507
Ophthalmology. 2000 Jul;107(7):1316-20
pubmed: 10889105
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 06;9(11):e112403
pubmed: 25375855
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2000 May;19(3):297-321
pubmed: 10749379
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993 Jun;34(7):2260-5
pubmed: 8505207
Am J Ophthalmol. 1978 Feb;85(2):145-53
pubmed: 623182
Ophthalmology. 1999 Oct;106(10):1994-2004
pubmed: 10519598
J Glaucoma. 2018 Mar;27(3):269-274
pubmed: 29303874
Ophthalmology. 1996 Oct;103(10):1661-9
pubmed: 8874440
Neurology. 2021 Jan 5;96(1):e131-e140
pubmed: 33093228
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2013 Sep-Dec;7(3):106-14
pubmed: 26997792
J Neuroophthalmol. 2021 Dec 1;41(4):e560-e565
pubmed: 33136668
J Neuroophthalmol. 2015 Sep;35 Suppl 1:S8-S21
pubmed: 26274837
Br J Ophthalmol. 1972 Mar;56(3):146-57
pubmed: 5032753