Stepwise activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Apr 2024
17 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
28
08
2023
accepted:
15
03
2024
medline:
18
4
2024
pubmed:
18
4
2024
entrez:
17
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Metabotropic glutamate receptors belong to a family of G protein-coupled receptors that are obligate dimers and possess a large extracellular ligand-binding domain that is linked via a cysteine-rich domain to their 7-transmembrane domain
Identifiants
pubmed: 38632403
doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07327-x
pii: 10.1038/s41586-024-07327-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Pin, J.-P. & Bettler, B. Organization and functions of mGlu and GABAB receptor complexes. Nature 540, 60–68 (2016).
pubmed: 27905440
doi: 10.1038/nature20566
Koehl, A. et al. Structural insights into the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Nature 566, 79–84 (2019).
pubmed: 30675062
pmcid: 6709600
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0881-4
Moustaine, D. E. et al. Distinct roles of metabotropic glutamate receptor dimerization in agonist activation and G-protein coupling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16342–16347 (2012).
pubmed: 22988116
pmcid: 3479612
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205838109
Gasparini, F. & Spooren, W. Allosteric modulators for mGlu receptors. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 5, 187–194 (2007).
pubmed: 19305801
pmcid: 2656819
doi: 10.2174/157015907781695900
Ritchie, T. K. et al. Chapter 11 – Reconstitution of membrane proteins in phospholipid bilayer nanodiscs. Methods Enzymol. 464, 211–231 (2009).
pubmed: 19903557
pmcid: 4196316
doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64011-8
Nasrallah, C. et al. Direct coupling of detergent purified human mGlu5 receptor to the heterotrimeric G proteins Gq and Gs. Sci. Rep. 8, 4407 (2018).
pubmed: 29535347
pmcid: 5849714
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22729-4
Seven, A. B. et al. G-protein activation by a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Nature 595, 450–454 (2021).
pubmed: 34194039
pmcid: 8822903
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03680-3
Nasrallah, C. et al. Agonists and allosteric modulators promote signaling from different metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 conformations. Cell Rep. 36, 109648 (2021).
pubmed: 34469715
pmcid: 8424648
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109648
Christopher, J. A., Doré, A. S. & Tehan, B. G. Potential for the rational design of allosteric modulators of class C GPCRs. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 17, 71–78 (2017).
pubmed: 27448651
doi: 10.2174/1568026616666160719165922
Doré, A. S. et al. Structure of class C GPCR metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 transmembrane domain. Nature 511, 557–562 (2014).
pubmed: 25042998
doi: 10.1038/nature13396
Christopher, J. A. et al. Structure-based optimization strategies for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) allosteric modulators: a case study from analyses of new metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu5) X-ray structures. J. Med. Chem. 62, 207–222 (2019).
pubmed: 29455526
doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01722
Zhang, J. et al. Structural insights into the activation initiation of full-length mGlu1. Protein Cell 12, 662–667 (2021).
pubmed: 33278019
doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00808-5
Hlavackova, V. et al. Evidence for a single heptahelical domain being turned on upon activation of a dimeric GPCR. EMBO J. 24, 499–509 (2005).
pubmed: 15660124
pmcid: 548662
doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600557
Fang, W. et al. Structural basis of the activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 3. Cell Res. 32, 695–698 (2022).
pubmed: 35236939
pmcid: 9253128
doi: 10.1038/s41422-022-00623-z
Goudet, C. et al. Asymmetric functioning of dimeric metabotropic glutamate receptors disclosed by positive allosteric modulators. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 24380–24385 (2005).
pubmed: 15863499
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M502642200
Isberg, V. et al. Generic GPCR residue numbers – aligning topology maps while minding the gaps. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 36, 22–31 (2015).
pubmed: 25541108
doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2014.11.001
Mølck, C. et al. Pharmacological characterization and modeling of the binding sites of novel 1,3-bis(pyridinylethynyl)benzenes as metabotropic glutamate receptor 5-selective negative allosteric modulators. Mol. Pharmacol. 82, 929–937 (2012).
pubmed: 22899869
doi: 10.1124/mol.112.078808
Gregory, K. J. et al. Probing the metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGlu
pubmed: 23444015
pmcid: 3629835
doi: 10.1124/mol.112.083949
Gregory, K. J. et al. Identification of specific ligand-receptor interactions that govern binding and cooperativity of diverse modulators to a common metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 allosteric site. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 5, 282–295 (2014).
pubmed: 24528109
pmcid: 3990945
doi: 10.1021/cn400225x
Gregory, K. J. & Conn, P. J. Molecular insights into metabotropic glutamate receptor allosteric modulation. Mol. Pharmacol. 88, 188–202 (2015).
pubmed: 25808929
pmcid: 4468636
doi: 10.1124/mol.114.097220
Hellyer, S. D. et al. Probe dependence and biased potentiation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 is mediated by differential ligand interactions in the common allosteric binding site. Biochem. Pharmacol. 177, 114013 (2020).
Dalton, J. A. R. et al. Shining light on an mGlu5 photoswitchable NAM: a theoretical perspective. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 14, 441–454 (2016).
pubmed: 26391742
pmcid: 4983757
doi: 10.2174/1570159X13666150407231417
Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3D variability analysis: resolving continuous flexibility and discrete heterogeneity from single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107702 (2021).
pubmed: 33582281
doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2021.107702
Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3DFlex: determining structure and motion of flexible proteins from cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 6, 860–870 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01853-8
Lin, S. et al. Structures of Gi-bound metabotropic glutamate receptors mGlu2 and mGlu4. Nature 594, 583–588 (2021).
pubmed: 34135510
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03495-2
Brunette, A. M. J. & Farrens, D. L. Distance mapping in proteins using fluorescence spectroscopy: tyrosine, like tryptophan, quenches bimane fluorescence in a distance-dependent manner. Biochemistry 53, 6290–6301 (2014).
doi: 10.1021/bi500493r
Mansoor, S. E., Dewitt, M. A. & Farrens, D. L. Distance mapping in proteins using fluorescence spectroscopy: the tryptophan-induced quenching (TrIQ) method. Biochemistry 49, 9722–9731 (2010).
pubmed: 20886836
doi: 10.1021/bi100907m
Liauw, B. W.-H., Afsari, H. S. & Vafabakhsh, R. Conformational rearrangement during activation of a metabotropic glutamate receptor. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 291–297 (2021).
pubmed: 33398167
pmcid: 7904630
doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-00702-5
Liauw, B. W.-H. et al. Conformational fingerprinting of allosteric modulators in metabotropic glutamate receptor 2. eLife 11, e78982 (2022).
pubmed: 35775730
pmcid: 9299836
doi: 10.7554/eLife.78982
Vafabakhsh, R., Levitz, J. & Isacoff, E. Y. Conformational dynamics of a class C G-protein-coupled receptor. Nature 524, 497–501 (2015).
pubmed: 26258295
pmcid: 4597782
doi: 10.1038/nature14679
Maeda, S. et al. Development of an antibody fragment that stabilizes GPCR/G-protein complexes. Nat. Commun. 9, 3712 (2018).
pubmed: 30213947
pmcid: 6137068
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06002-w
Gregorio, G. G. et al. Single-molecule analysis of ligand efficacy in β
pubmed: 28607487
pmcid: 5502743
doi: 10.1038/nature22354
Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017).
pubmed: 28165473
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4169
Punjani, A., Zhang, H. & Fleet, D. J. Non-uniform refinement: adaptive regularization improves single-particle cryo-EM reconstruction. Nat. Methods 17, 1214–1221 (2020).
pubmed: 33257830
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-00990-8
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
pubmed: 15264254
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Adams, P. D. et al. The Phenix software for automated determination of macromolecular structures. Methods 55, 94–106 (2011).
pubmed: 21821126
pmcid: 3193589
doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.07.005
Terwilliger, T. C., Sobolev, O. V., Afonine, P. V. & Adams, P. D. Automated map sharpening by maximization of detail and connectivity. Acta Crystallogr. D Struct. Biol. 74, 545–559 (2018).
pubmed: 29872005
pmcid: 6096490
doi: 10.1107/S2059798318004655
Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017).
pubmed: 28671674
pmcid: 5533649
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4347
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 66, 486–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20383002
pmcid: 2852313
doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. CHARMM-GUI: a web-based graphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008).
pubmed: 18351591
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20945
Lee, J. et al. CHARMM-GUI membrane builder for complex biological membrane simulations with glycolipids and lipoglycans. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 775–786 (2019).
pubmed: 30525595
doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01066
Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: a force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671–690 (2010).
pubmed: 19575467
pmcid: 2888302
doi: 10.1002/jcc.21367
Sastry, G. M., Adzhigirey, M., Day, T., Annabhimoju, R. & Sherman, W. Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 27, 221–234 (2013).
pubmed: 23579614
doi: 10.1007/s10822-013-9644-8
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
pubmed: 27819658
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4067
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 79, 926–935 (1983).
doi: 10.1063/1.445869
Eastman, P. et al. OpenMM 7: rapid development of high performance algorithms for molecular dynamics. PLoS Comput. Biol. 13, e1005659 (2017).
pubmed: 28746339
pmcid: 5549999
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659
Gao, Y. et al. CHARMM-GUI supports hydrogen mass repartitioning and different protonation states of phosphates in lipopolysaccharides. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 831–839 (2021).
pubmed: 33442985
pmcid: 7902386
doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01360
Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E. J., Woolf, T. B. & Beckstein, O. MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 32, 2319–2327 (2011).
pubmed: 21500218
pmcid: 3144279
doi: 10.1002/jcc.21787
Juette, M. F. et al. Single-molecule imaging of non-equilibrium molecular ensembles on the millisecond timescale. Nat. Methods 13, 341–344 (2016).
pubmed: 26878382
pmcid: 4814340
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3769
Haran, G. Noise reduction in single-molecule fluorescence trajectories of folding proteins. Chem. Phys. 307, 137–145 (2004).
doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.05.017
Bronson, J. E., Fei, J., Hofman, J. M., Gonzalez, R. L. & Wiggins, C. H. Learning rates and states from biophysical time series: a Bayesian approach to model selection and single-molecule FRET data. Biophys. J. 97, 3196–3205 (2009).
pubmed: 20006957
pmcid: 2793368
doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.09.031
McKinney, S. A., Joo, C. & Ha, T. Analysis of single-molecule FRET trajectories using hidden Markov modeling. Biophys. J. 91, 1941–1951 (2006).
pubmed: 16766620
pmcid: 1544307
doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082487