ROAD2H: Development and evaluation of an open-source explainable artificial intelligence approach for managing co-morbidity and clinical guidelines.

CDS hooks FHIR Transition‐based Medical Recommendation model argumentation clinical decision support systems co‐morbidity

Journal

Learning health systems
ISSN: 2379-6146
Titre abrégé: Learn Health Syst
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101708071

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 21 05 2023
revised: 29 07 2023
accepted: 07 08 2023
medline: 18 4 2024
pubmed: 18 4 2024
entrez: 18 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Clinical decision support (CDS) systems (CDSSs) that integrate clinical guidelines need to reflect real-world co-morbidity. In patient-specific clinical contexts, transparent recommendations that allow for contraindications and other conflicts arising from co-morbidity are a requirement. In this work, we develop and evaluate a non-proprietary, standards-based approach to the deployment of computable guidelines with explainable argumentation, integrated with a commercial electronic health record (EHR) system in Serbia, a middle-income country in West Balkans. We used an ontological framework, the Transition-based Medical Recommendation (TMR) model, to represent, and reason about, guideline concepts, and chose the 2017 International global initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline and a Serbian hospital as the deployment and evaluation site, respectively. To mitigate potential guideline conflicts, we used a TMR-based implementation of the Assumptions-Based Argumentation framework extended with preferences and Goals (ABA+G). Remote EHR integration of computable guidelines was via a microservice architecture based on HL7 FHIR and CDS Hooks. A prototype integration was developed to manage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comorbid cardiovascular or chronic kidney diseases, and a mixed-methods evaluation was conducted with 20 simulated cases and five pulmonologists. Pulmonologists agreed 97% of the time with the GOLD-based COPD symptom severity assessment assigned to each patient by the CDSS, and 98% of the time with one of the proposed COPD care plans. Comments were favourable on the principles of explainable argumentation; inclusion of additional co-morbidities was suggested in the future along with customisation of the level of explanation with expertise. An ontological model provided a flexible means of providing argumentation and explainable artificial intelligence for a long-term condition. Extension to other guidelines and multiple co-morbidities is needed to test the approach further.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38633019
doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10391
pii: LRH210391
pmc: PMC11019374
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e10391

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Learning Health Systems published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of University of Michigan.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no financial or non‐financial competing interests.

Auteurs

Jesús Domínguez (J)

Department of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.

Denys Prociuk (D)

Imperial College London London UK.

Branko Marović (B)

University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia.

Kristijonas Čyras (K)

Imperial College London London UK.

Oana Cocarascu (O)

Department of Informatics King's College London London UK.

Francis Ruiz (F)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK.

Ella Mi (E)

University of Oxford Oxford UK.

Emma Mi (E)

University of Oxford Oxford UK.

Christian Ramtale (C)

Imperial College London London UK.

Antonio Rago (A)

Imperial College London London UK.

Ara Darzi (A)

Imperial College London London UK.

Francesca Toni (F)

Imperial College London London UK.

Vasa Curcin (V)

Department of Population Health Sciences King's College London London UK.

Brendan Delaney (B)

Imperial College London London UK.

Classifications MeSH