Surveillance of adults with congenital heart disease: Current guidelines and actual clinical practice.
Congenital heart disease
Diagnostic tests
Follow-up
Journal
International journal of cardiology
ISSN: 1874-1754
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8200291
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Apr 2024
16 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
26
01
2024
revised:
08
03
2024
accepted:
04
04
2024
medline:
19
4
2024
pubmed:
19
4
2024
entrez:
18
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect with prevalence of 0.8%. Thanks to tremendous progress in medical and surgical practice, nowadays, >90% of children survive into adulthood. Recently European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC)/ American Heart Association (AHA) issued guidelines which offer diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for the different defect categories. However, the type of technical exams and their frequency of follow-up may vary largely between clinicians and centres. We aimed to present an overview of available diagnostic modalities and describe current surveillance practices by cardiologists taking care of adults with CHD (ACHD). A questionnaire was used to assess the frequency cardiologists treating ACHD for at least one year administrated the most common diagnostic tests for ACHD. The most frequently employed diagnostic modalities were ECG and echocardiography for both mild and moderate/complex CHD. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported that they routinely address psychosocial well-being. Differences exist between reported current clinical practice and published guidelines. This is particularly true for the care of patients with mild lesions. In addition, some differences exist between ESC and American guidelines, with more frequent surveillance suggested by the Americans.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common birth defect with prevalence of 0.8%. Thanks to tremendous progress in medical and surgical practice, nowadays, >90% of children survive into adulthood. Recently European Society of Cardiology (ESC), American College of Cardiology (ACC)/ American Heart Association (AHA) issued guidelines which offer diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations for the different defect categories. However, the type of technical exams and their frequency of follow-up may vary largely between clinicians and centres. We aimed to present an overview of available diagnostic modalities and describe current surveillance practices by cardiologists taking care of adults with CHD (ACHD).
METHODS AND RESULTS
RESULTS
A questionnaire was used to assess the frequency cardiologists treating ACHD for at least one year administrated the most common diagnostic tests for ACHD. The most frequently employed diagnostic modalities were ECG and echocardiography for both mild and moderate/complex CHD. Sixty-seven percent of respondents reported that they routinely address psychosocial well-being.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Differences exist between reported current clinical practice and published guidelines. This is particularly true for the care of patients with mild lesions. In addition, some differences exist between ESC and American guidelines, with more frequent surveillance suggested by the Americans.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38636602
pii: S0167-5273(24)00616-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132022
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
132022Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.