Interplatform comparison between three ion mobility techniques for human plasma lipid collision cross sections.

Collision cross section Drift tube ion mobility spectrometry Inter-laboratory comparison Lipidomics Trapped ion mobility spectrometry Travelling wave ion mobility spectrometry

Journal

Analytica chimica acta
ISSN: 1873-4324
Titre abrégé: Anal Chim Acta
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0370534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 May 2024
Historique:
received: 26 10 2023
revised: 12 03 2024
accepted: 25 03 2024
medline: 19 4 2024
pubmed: 19 4 2024
entrez: 18 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The implementation of ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) in liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) workflows has become a valuable tool for improving compound annotation in metabolomics analyses by increasing peak capacity and by adding a new molecular descriptor, the collision cross section (CCS). Although some studies reported high repeatability and reproducibility of CCS determination and only few studies reported good interplatform agreement for small molecules, standardized protocols are still missing due to the lack of reference CCS values and reference materials. We present a comparison of CCS values of approximatively one hundred lipid species either commercially available or extracted from human plasma. We used three different commercial ion mobility technologies from different laboratories, drift tube IMS (DTIMS), travelling wave IMS (TWIMS) and trapped IMS (TIMS), to evaluate both instrument repeatability and interlaboratory reproducibility. We showed that CCS discrepancies of 0.3% (average) could occur depending on the data processing software tools. Moreover, eleven CCS calibrants were evaluated yielding mean RSD below 2% for eight calibrants, ESI Low concentration tuning mix (Tune Mix) showing the lowest RSD (< 0.5%) in both ion modes. Tune Mix calibrated CCS from the three different IMS instruments proved to be well correlated and highly reproducible (R

Identifiants

pubmed: 38637036
pii: S0003-2670(24)00336-2
doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2024.342535
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

342535

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Anaïs C George (AC)

Univ Rouen Normandie, INSA Rouen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Univ, COBRA UMR 6014, INC3M FR 3038, F-76000, Rouen, France.

Isabelle Schmitz (I)

Univ Rouen Normandie, INSA Rouen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Univ, COBRA UMR 6014, INC3M FR 3038, F-76000, Rouen, France.

Florent Rouvière (F)

Université de Lyon, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280 CNRS, 5 rue de la Doua, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.

Sandra Alves (S)

Sorbonne Université, Faculté des Sciences et de l'Ingénierie, Institut Parisien de Chimie Moléculaire (IPCM), Paris, France.

Benoit Colsch (B)

Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), MetaboHUB, F-91191, Gif sur Yvette, France.

Sabine Heinisch (S)

Université de Lyon, Institut des Sciences Analytiques, UMR 5280 CNRS, 5 rue de la Doua, 69100, Villeurbanne, France.

Carlos Afonso (C)

Univ Rouen Normandie, INSA Rouen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Univ, COBRA UMR 6014, INC3M FR 3038, F-76000, Rouen, France.

François Fenaille (F)

Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, INRAE, Département Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS), MetaboHUB, F-91191, Gif sur Yvette, France.

Corinne Loutelier-Bourhis (C)

Univ Rouen Normandie, INSA Rouen Normandie, CNRS, Normandie Univ, COBRA UMR 6014, INC3M FR 3038, F-76000, Rouen, France. Electronic address: corinne.loutelier@univ-rouen.fr.

Classifications MeSH