Effect of bone density on the drill-hole diameter made by a cannulated drill bit in cancellous bone.

Bone density Cancellous bone Drill bit Hole diameter Manual drilling technique Osteoporosis

Journal

Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association
ISSN: 1436-2023
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Sci
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9604934

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 18 12 2023
revised: 05 03 2024
accepted: 06 04 2024
medline: 19 4 2024
pubmed: 19 4 2024
entrez: 18 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

When a pilot hole is made prior to a screw's insertion into bone, the same drill bit is used irrespective of the bone quality. However, osteoporotic bone is fragile and this may affect the hole diameter, which is of particular concern in cancellous bone. In this study, the relationship between bone density and drill-hole diameter was investigated assuming a pre-drilling process in screw-only osteosynthesis in the metaphysis and epiphysis. Two types of drill bit (triple-flute [T] and quadruple-flute [Q]) with different shapes and diameters were prepared: type T bits with 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm diameters, and type Q bits with 3.5 mm and 4.2 mm diameters. Drilling was performed manually in simulated bones with four densities: 5, 10, 15, and 20 pounds per cubic foot. We measured the hole diameters with a coordinate measuring machine and analyzed the relationship between the drill-hole diameters and the densities of the simulated bones. We then compared the screw pull-out strength between the two 3.5-diameter drill bits. In all cases, the diameters of the drill holes were larger than those of the drill bits. The relationship between the drill-hole diameters and the bone densities was a negative linear correlation. Enlarging the hole diameter decreased the screw pull-out strength. For cannulated drill bits of 3.5, 4.2 and 4.4 mm diameter, the diameter of the drill hole in cancellous bone obtained by the manual drilling technique tends to be larger in low-density (e.g., osteoporotic) compared to high-density (e.g., healthy) bone.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
When a pilot hole is made prior to a screw's insertion into bone, the same drill bit is used irrespective of the bone quality. However, osteoporotic bone is fragile and this may affect the hole diameter, which is of particular concern in cancellous bone. In this study, the relationship between bone density and drill-hole diameter was investigated assuming a pre-drilling process in screw-only osteosynthesis in the metaphysis and epiphysis.
METHODS METHODS
Two types of drill bit (triple-flute [T] and quadruple-flute [Q]) with different shapes and diameters were prepared: type T bits with 3.5 mm and 4.4 mm diameters, and type Q bits with 3.5 mm and 4.2 mm diameters. Drilling was performed manually in simulated bones with four densities: 5, 10, 15, and 20 pounds per cubic foot. We measured the hole diameters with a coordinate measuring machine and analyzed the relationship between the drill-hole diameters and the densities of the simulated bones. We then compared the screw pull-out strength between the two 3.5-diameter drill bits.
RESULTS RESULTS
In all cases, the diameters of the drill holes were larger than those of the drill bits. The relationship between the drill-hole diameters and the bone densities was a negative linear correlation. Enlarging the hole diameter decreased the screw pull-out strength.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
For cannulated drill bits of 3.5, 4.2 and 4.4 mm diameter, the diameter of the drill hole in cancellous bone obtained by the manual drilling technique tends to be larger in low-density (e.g., osteoporotic) compared to high-density (e.g., healthy) bone.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38637192
pii: S0949-2658(24)00058-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2024.04.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest This research was not supported by any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Auteurs

Utomo Andi Pangnguriseng (UA)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan; Department of Orthopaedic, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Muslim Indonesia, Sulawesi Selatan, Indonesia.

Shinji Imade (S)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan. Electronic address: imades@med.shimane-u.ac.jp.

Satoshi Furuya (S)

Department of Manufacturing Technology, Shimane Institute for Industrial Technology, Shimane, Japan.

Koichiro Nakazawa (K)

Department of Manufacturing Technology, Shimane Institute for Industrial Technology, Shimane, Japan.

Kazuma Shiraishi (K)

Department of Manufacturing Technology, Shimane Institute for Industrial Technology, Shimane, Japan.

Masaya Sato (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.

Toshihiko Kawamura (T)

Division of Medical Informatics, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.

Yuji Uchio (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.

Classifications MeSH