Clinical practice, decision-making, and use of clinical decision support systems in invasive mechanical ventilation: a narrative review.

clinical decision support system clinical practice decision-making implementation invasive mechanical ventilation personalised ventilation

Journal

British journal of anaesthesia
ISSN: 1471-6771
Titre abrégé: Br J Anaesth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 24 11 2023
revised: 29 02 2024
accepted: 07 03 2024
medline: 19 4 2024
pubmed: 19 4 2024
entrez: 18 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Invasive mechanical ventilation is a key supportive therapy for patients on intensive care. There is increasing emphasis on personalised ventilation strategies. Clinical decision support systems (CDSS) have been developed to support this. We conducted a narrative review to assess evidence that could inform device implementation. A search was conducted in MEDLINE (Ovid) and EMBASE. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Role allocation is well described, with interprofessional collaboration dependent on culture, nurse:patient ratio, the use of protocols, and perception of responsibility. There were no descriptions of process measures, quality metrics, or clinical workflow. Nurse-led weaning is well-described, with factors grouped by patient, nurse, and system. Physician-led weaning is heterogenous, guided by subjective and objective information, and 'gestalt'. No studies explored decision-making with CDSS. Several explored facilitators and barriers to implementation, grouped by clinician (facilitators: confidence using CDSS, retaining decision-making ownership; barriers: undermining clinician's role, ambiguity moving off protocol), intervention (facilitators: user-friendly interface, ease of workflow integration, minimal training requirement; barriers: increased documentation time), and organisation (facilitators: system-level mandate; barriers: poor communication, inconsistent training, lack of technical support). One study described factors that support CDSS implementation. There are gaps in our understanding of ventilation practice. A coordinated approach grounded in implementation science is required to support CDSS implementation. Future research should describe factors that guide clinical decision-making throughout mechanical ventilation, with and without CDSS, map clinical workflow, and devise implementation toolkits. Novel research design analogous to a learning organisation, that considers the commercial aspects of device design, is required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38637268
pii: S0007-0912(24)00142-9
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.03.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Mayur Murali (M)

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine & Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. Electronic address: m.murali@imperial.ac.uk.

Melody Ni (M)

NIHR London In Vitro Diagnostics Cooperative, London, UK.

Dan S Karbing (DS)

Respiratory and Critical Care Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Stephen E Rees (SE)

Respiratory and Critical Care Group, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Matthieu Komorowski (M)

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine & Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Dominic Marshall (D)

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine & Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Padmanabhan Ramnarayan (P)

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine & Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Imperial Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, London, UK.

Brijesh V Patel (BV)

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine & Intensive Care, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK; Department of Anaesthesia & Critical Care, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH