Acceptability and feasibility of policy implementation strategies for taxes earmarked for behavioral health services.
acceptability
behavioral health
feasibility
implementation science
policy
Journal
Frontiers in health services
ISSN: 2813-0146
Titre abrégé: Front Health Serv
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9918334887706676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
28
09
2023
accepted:
21
03
2024
medline:
19
4
2024
pubmed:
19
4
2024
entrez:
19
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study's aims are to: (1) Compare the acceptability and feasibility of five types of implementation strategies that could be deployed to increase the reach of evidence-based practices (EBPs) with revenue from policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services, and (2) Illustrate how definitions of implementation strategies and measures of acceptability and feasibility can be used in policy-focused implementation science research. Web-based surveys of public agency and community organization professionals involved with earmarked tax policy implementation were completed in 2022-2023 ( For acceptability, capacity-building strategies had the highest rating ( Capacity-building and dissemination strategies may be well-received and readily deployed by policy implementers to support EBPs implementation with revenue from taxes earmarked for behavioral health services. Adapting definitions of implementation strategies for policy-focused topics, and applying established measures of acceptability and feasibility to these strategies, demonstrates utility as an approach to advance research on policy-focused implementation strategies.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
This study's aims are to: (1) Compare the acceptability and feasibility of five types of implementation strategies that could be deployed to increase the reach of evidence-based practices (EBPs) with revenue from policies that earmark taxes for behavioral health services, and (2) Illustrate how definitions of implementation strategies and measures of acceptability and feasibility can be used in policy-focused implementation science research.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Web-based surveys of public agency and community organization professionals involved with earmarked tax policy implementation were completed in 2022-2023 (
Findings
UNASSIGNED
For acceptability, capacity-building strategies had the highest rating (
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Capacity-building and dissemination strategies may be well-received and readily deployed by policy implementers to support EBPs implementation with revenue from taxes earmarked for behavioral health services. Adapting definitions of implementation strategies for policy-focused topics, and applying established measures of acceptability and feasibility to these strategies, demonstrates utility as an approach to advance research on policy-focused implementation strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38638608
doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1304049
pmc: PMC11025354
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1304049Informations de copyright
© 2024 Purtle, Stadnick, Wynecoop, Walker, Bruns and Aarons.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 3;12(1):125
pubmed: 29100551
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 4;13(1):1
pubmed: 29301543
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Jul 21;1:2633489520940022
pubmed: 37089125
Am J Public Health. 2009 Dec;99(12):2123-7
pubmed: 19833993
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Jun 6;3:26334895221105585
pubmed: 37091077
Implement Sci. 2017 Jan 5;12(1):1
pubmed: 28057027
Am Psychol. 2020 Nov;75(8):1130-1145
pubmed: 33252950
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Mar 31;4(1):37
pubmed: 37004117
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 02;8:1
pubmed: 23279972
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 4;17(1):1
pubmed: 34983585
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul;45(3):516-526
pubmed: 29247374
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 17;9:681602
pubmed: 34222180
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Jan;45(1):1-12
pubmed: 27507243
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Jan 1;71(1):100-104
pubmed: 31590621
Am Psychol. 2020 Nov;75(8):1052-1066
pubmed: 33252944
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Nov 1;71(11):1170-1178
pubmed: 32517640
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr 1;3(4):e220292
pubmed: 36218958
Am J Public Health. 2010 Apr;100(4):590-5
pubmed: 20167880
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 10;8:63
pubmed: 23758952
Ethn Dis. 2021 Jan 21;31(1):133-138
pubmed: 33519163
Implement Sci. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):1
pubmed: 33413491
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jan 4;4(1):1
pubmed: 36600290
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Nov 30;11(11):1972-1979
pubmed: 34850924
Implement Sci. 2022 Aug 9;17(1):53
pubmed: 35945548
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Apr 01;73(4):381-387
pubmed: 34320821
Am J Public Health. 2013 Sep;103(9):1693-9
pubmed: 23865659
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Dec 4;3:26334895221141116
pubmed: 37091091
Implement Res Pract. 2020 Aug 30;1:2633489520939980
pubmed: 37089129
Implement Sci. 2015 Jan 08;10:1
pubmed: 25567289
Front Health Serv. 2023 Sep 08;3:1220629
pubmed: 37771411
Implement Sci. 2022 Dec 12;17(1):80
pubmed: 36503520
J Behav Med. 2019 Feb;42(1):84-94
pubmed: 30825091
Psychiatr Serv. 2022 Apr 01;73(4):388-395
pubmed: 34384231
Implement Sci. 2020 Jan 3;15(1):1
pubmed: 31900167
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Sep 18;4(1):113
pubmed: 37723580
Milbank Q. 2023 Jun;101(2):457-485
pubmed: 37070393