Assessment of omeprazole and famotidine effects on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in patients following kidney transplant-randomized controlled trial.
famotidine
kidney transplant
omeprazole
pharmacotherapy
tacrolimus pharmacokinetics
Journal
Frontiers in pharmacology
ISSN: 1663-9812
Titre abrégé: Front Pharmacol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548923
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
23
01
2024
accepted:
21
03
2024
medline:
19
4
2024
pubmed:
19
4
2024
entrez:
19
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tacrolimus is metabolized in the liver with the participation of the CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 enzymes. Proton pump inhibitors are used in kidney transplant patients to prevent duodenal and gastric ulcer disease due to glucocorticoids. Omeprazole, unlike famotidine, is a substrate and inhibitor of the enzymes CYP2C19, CYP3A4, CYP3A5. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of omeprazole and famotidine on the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus. A randomized, non-blinded study involving 22 stabilized adult kidney transplant patients was conducted. Patients received the standard triple immunosuppression regimen and omeprazole 20 mg (n = 10) or famotidine 20 mg (n = 12). The study material consisted of blood samples in which tacrolimus concentrations were determined using the Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immuno Assay method. A single administration of omeprazole increased tacrolimus concentrations at 2 h (day 2) = 11.90 ± 1.59 ng/mL vs. 2 h (day 1 - no omeprazole administration) = 9.40 ± 0.79 ng/mL (
Identifiants
pubmed: 38638867
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1352323
pii: 1352323
pmc: PMC11024357
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05061303']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1352323Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Miedziaszczyk, Karczewski, Grabowski, Wolc and Idasiak-Piechocka.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Transpl Int. 2022 Mar 21;35:10225
pubmed: 36017158
Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2007 Dec;22(6):441-4
pubmed: 18159131
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Jul;62(1):41-9
pubmed: 9246018
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2012;5:49-59
pubmed: 22649281
Clin Ther. 2020 Oct;42(10):2049-2065
pubmed: 32888708
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Apr;57(4):487-94
pubmed: 15025747
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009 Feb;53(2):541-51
pubmed: 19029318
Transpl Int. 2005 Jun;18(6):643-50
pubmed: 15910287
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Mar;41(3):187-90
pubmed: 8866917
Pharmaceutics. 2010 Sep 09;2(3):291-299
pubmed: 27721357
Drug Metab Dispos. 2013 Feb;41(2):480-7
pubmed: 23175667
Drug Metab Dispos. 2009 Apr;37(4):821-6
pubmed: 19139162
Ther Drug Monit. 2012 Dec;34(6):739-41
pubmed: 23042259
Transplantation. 2014 Sep 27;98(6):e63-4
pubmed: 25221905
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e111128
pubmed: 25340655
Biomed Pharmacother. 2023 Oct;166:115149
pubmed: 37619481
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Mar;17(3):4195-4202
pubmed: 29328413
Ther Drug Monit. 2019 Jun;41(3):261-307
pubmed: 31045868
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Apr;21(2):161-6
pubmed: 11270912
Transplantation. 2006 Feb 15;81(3):487-8
pubmed: 16477241