Role of Carotid Ultrasonography Combined with Monocyte/HDL Ratio in Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.
Carotid duplex ultrasonography (DUS)
Digital subtraction angiography (DSA)
High-risk patients.
Internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis
MHR
PSV
Journal
Current medical imaging
ISSN: 1573-4056
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Imaging
Pays: United Arab Emirates
ID NLM: 101762461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Apr 2024
18 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
11
12
2023
revised:
12
03
2024
accepted:
25
03
2024
medline:
19
4
2024
pubmed:
19
4
2024
entrez:
19
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Carotid duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is the primary screening tool for carotid artery stenosis, but has low reliability. MHR, which is the ratio of monocytes to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), can be a marker for the degree and distribution of extracranial and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. We determined the diagnostic value of DUS+MHR for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. We divided 273 hospitalized patients into non-stenosis (<50%) and ICA stenosis (≥50%) groups based on Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). We determined the peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the ICA on DUS, calculated the MHR, and investigated their relationship with ICA stenosis. On DSA, 34.1% (93/273) patients had moderate-to-severe ICA stenosis. DUS and DSA showed low concordance for detecting ICA stenosis (kappa = 0.390). With increasing age, the incidence of moderate-to-severe ICA stenosis increased. PSV, monocyte count, and MHR were significantly greater in the stenosis group than in the non-stenosis group (P < 0.001), while the HDL-C level was significantly lower (P = 0.001). PSV (OR: 1.020, 95% CI: 1.011-1.029, P < 0.001) and MHR (OR: 5.662, 95% CI: 1.945-16.482, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for ICA stenosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PSV+MHR (0.819) was significantly higher than that of PSV or MHR alone (77.42% sensitivity, P = 0.0207; 73.89% specificity, P = 0.0032). The combination of ICA PSV on DUS and MHR is better than PSV alone at identifying ICA stenosis and is well-suited to screen high-risk patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Carotid duplex ultrasonography (DUS) is the primary screening tool for carotid artery stenosis, but has low reliability. MHR, which is the ratio of monocytes to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), can be a marker for the degree and distribution of extracranial and intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
We determined the diagnostic value of DUS+MHR for internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.
METHODS
METHODS
We divided 273 hospitalized patients into non-stenosis (<50%) and ICA stenosis (≥50%) groups based on Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). We determined the peak systolic velocity (PSV) in the ICA on DUS, calculated the MHR, and investigated their relationship with ICA stenosis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On DSA, 34.1% (93/273) patients had moderate-to-severe ICA stenosis. DUS and DSA showed low concordance for detecting ICA stenosis (kappa = 0.390). With increasing age, the incidence of moderate-to-severe ICA stenosis increased. PSV, monocyte count, and MHR were significantly greater in the stenosis group than in the non-stenosis group (P < 0.001), while the HDL-C level was significantly lower (P = 0.001). PSV (OR: 1.020, 95% CI: 1.011-1.029, P < 0.001) and MHR (OR: 5.662, 95% CI: 1.945-16.482, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors for ICA stenosis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of PSV+MHR (0.819) was significantly higher than that of PSV or MHR alone (77.42% sensitivity, P = 0.0207; 73.89% specificity, P = 0.0032).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of ICA PSV on DUS and MHR is better than PSV alone at identifying ICA stenosis and is well-suited to screen high-risk patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38639287
pii: CMIR-EPUB-139851
doi: 10.2174/0115734056289735240409083434
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.