Clinical outcomes of adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy technique in locally advanced cervical cancer: A real-world data.

Adaptive brachytherapy Brachytherapy Cervical cancer HDR

Journal

Brachytherapy
ISSN: 1873-1449
Titre abrégé: Brachytherapy
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101137600

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 04 02 2024
revised: 10 03 2024
accepted: 19 03 2024
medline: 20 4 2024
pubmed: 20 4 2024
entrez: 19 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To evaluate clinical outcomes of CT-based adaptive intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy (IC followed by IC-ISBT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) in resource-constrained settings. LACC patients treated with adaptive brachytherapy techniques were analyzed to evaluate treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis, and the log-rank test for univariate analysis. Out of 141 eligible patients with LACC, 87 (61.7%) patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in referral hospitals, while 54 (38.3%) were treated at our center. We divided our cohort into two groups: poor EBRT responder group (n = 70 [49.6%]) where IC-ISBT was adapted to achieve optimum tumor doses and OAR optimization group 71 (50.4%) where IC-ISBT was performed to reduce OAR doses. Median HRCTV-D90 dose was 88 Gy (range 70-109 Gy) with median HRCTV volume 33cc (range 15-96). Median D2cc doses to OARs were 90 Gy (range 70-107), 71 Gy (range 55-105) and 70 Gy (range 47-90) to bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively. At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year local control (LC), locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were 83%, 75%, 64% and 72%, respectively. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better outcomes for OAR optimization compared to poor EBRT responders, with 3-year LC (95% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.001), LRC (87.3% vs. 62.7%, p < 0.001), DFS (79.2% vs. 49.4%, p < 0.001), and OS (86.2% vs. 57.4%, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: In resource-constrained settings, implementation of Adaptive IC-ISBT is a viable alternative for optimizing OAR doses in LACC. However proactive approach employing IC-ISBT for tumor dose-escalation from first fraction of BT is warranted for improving LC in poor EBRT responders.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38641455
pii: S1538-4721(24)00047-3
doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.03.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Sheetal R Kashid (SR)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Lavanya Gurram (L)

Advanced Radiation Oncology Fellow, Department of Radiation Oncology, CancerCare Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: naidu.lavanya@gmail.com.

Saritha Pullan (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Supriya Chopra (S)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Prachi Mittal (P)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Yogesh Ghadi (Y)

Department of Radiation Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

A Dheera (A)

Department of Radiation Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Libin Scaria (L)

Department of Radiation Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Satish Kohle (S)

Department of Radiation Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sudarshan Kadam (S)

Department of Radiation Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Jaya Ghosh (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sushmita Rath (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Sudeep Gupta (S)

Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Umesh Mahantshetty (U)

Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital, Visakhapatnam, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Classifications MeSH