Combined first-trimester screening and invasive diagnostics for atypical chromosomal aberrations: Danish nationwide data on prenatal profiles and detection compared with NIPT.

Atypical chromosomal aberrations CNV Combined testing Copy number variations NIPT Prenatal screening Risk assessment cFTS

Journal

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN: 1469-0705
Titre abrégé: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9108340

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 21 03 2024
received: 15 01 2024
accepted: 03 04 2024
medline: 20 4 2024
pubmed: 20 4 2024
entrez: 20 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To examine the prenatal profiles of pregnancies affected by an atypical chromosomal aberration, focusing on pathogenic copy number variants (pCNVs). Further, we wanted to quantify the performance of combined first-trimester screening (cFTS) and a second-trimester anomaly scan in detecting these conditions. Finally, we aimed to estimate the consequences of a policy of using non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) rather than invasive testing with chromosomal microarray (CMA) to manage pregnancies identified as high risk from cFTS. A retrospective review of the Danish fetal medicine database identified all pregnant women who had cFTS and a trisomy 21 risk-assessment between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2018. Chromosomal aberrations diagnosed prenatally, postnatally, or from fetal tissue following pregnancy loss or termination of pregnancy (TOP) were identified. Chromosomal aberrations were grouped into one of six categories: 1) Triploidy; 2) Common trisomies (trisomies 21, 18, and 13); 3) Monosomy X; 4) Other sex chromosome aberrations (SCAs); 5) pCNVs; and 6) Rare autosomal trisomies (RATs) and mosaicisms. The prevalence of each aberration-category was stratified by the individual cFTS markers and risk estimate, and the size of each pCNV diagnosed from CMA was calculated. We included data on 565,708 pregnancies of which 3,982 were diagnosed with a fetal chromosomal aberration (0.70%). cFTS performed well in identifying triploidies (86%), monosomy X (92%), atypical SCAs (58%), and RATs and mosaicisms (70%). pCNVs comprised 28% (n = 1,091) of the chromosomal aberrations diagnosed overall, and the prevalence increased during the study period with more prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis being performed. In pregnancies with maternal age <30 years, NT <95 As a by-product to screening for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, most triploidies and the majority of atypical SCAs, RATs, and mosaicisms are detected before birth. However, only 23% of pCNVs are high-risk from cFTS and only half are diagnosed before birth. Replacing invasive testing with NIPT for high-risk pregnancies would substantially decrease the first-trimester detection of pathogenic chromosomal anomalies. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38642365
doi: 10.1002/uog.27667
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

K Gadsbøll (K)

Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

I Vogel (I)

Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

S E Kristensen (SE)

Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

L H Pedersen (LH)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

J Hyett (J)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Sydney University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

O B Petersen (OB)

Center for Fetal Medicine, Pregnancy and Ultrasound, Department of Obstetrics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Classifications MeSH