Detrusor underactivity and complicated stress urinary incontinence: a cross-data study.

complicated stress urinary incontinence detrusor underactivity middle urethral sling uncomplicated stress urinary incontinence urodynamics

Journal

Central European journal of urology
ISSN: 2080-4806
Titre abrégé: Cent European J Urol
Pays: Poland
ID NLM: 101587101

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 15 07 2023
revised: 15 09 2023
accepted: 23 10 2023
medline: 22 4 2024
pubmed: 22 4 2024
entrez: 22 4 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

It is still uncertain whether detrusor underactivity (DUA) influences the outcomes of women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Even less evidence is available about women with complicated stress urinary incontinence (C-SUI). The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of middle urethral sling (MUS) placement according to the type of SUI, and the impact of DUA on uncomplicated SUI (U-SUI) and C-SUI functional and surgical results. The study was conducted among patients undergoing MUS. The population was divided into 4 groups: 1: C-SUI with DUA; 2: C-SUI without DUA; 3: U-SUI with DUA; and 4: U-SUI without DUA. Women were qualified for the DUA group if they met one of the Jeong, Abarbanel and Marcus, BVE, and PIP1 Griffiths criteria. Post-operative functional outcomes and differences in POUR rate, de novo overactive bladder syndrome (OAB), and SUI recurrence were examined. 142 women took part in the study, of whom 97 completed the 2-year follow-up. DUA was found in 54.6% (53/97) of patients. C-SUI was prevalent also in the no-DUA group (59.1%). Post-operative ICIQ-FLUTS improved more in the no-DUA patients compared to the DUA women. Post-operative Qmax was statistically significant higher the in no-DUA than in the DUA population. After surgery, neither the PVR nor the PVR ratio differed in the DUA and the no-DUA patients. C-SUI and U-SUI patients showed a POUR rate of 15.6%-12.1%, de novo OAB 12.5%-3%, tape incision 3.1%-3%, and SUI recurrence 4.6%-3%, respectively. The impact of pre-operative DUA on the outcomes of patients undergoing MUS was negligible, even in C-SUI cases. DUA women with SUI, even if complicated, should not be excluded from this kind of surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38645808
doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.147
pii: 147
pmc: PMC11032043
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

58-63

Informations de copyright

Copyright by Polish Urological Association.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Emanuele Rubilotta (E)

Department of Urology, A.O.U.I. Verona University, Verona, Italy.

Francesco Ditonno (F)

Department of Urology, A.O.U.I. Verona University, Verona, Italy.

Marilena Gubbiotti (M)

Department of Urology, S. Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy.

Alessandro Antonelli (A)

Department of Urology, A.O.U.I. Verona University, Verona, Italy.

Matteo Balzarro (M)

Department of Urology, A.O.U.I. Verona University, Verona, Italy.

Classifications MeSH