A systematic review of cardiac surgery clinical prediction models that include intra-operative variables.

Intra-operative variables cardiac surgery model validation morbidity mortality risk model

Journal

Perfusion
ISSN: 1477-111X
Titre abrégé: Perfusion
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8700166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 23 4 2024
pubmed: 23 4 2024
entrez: 22 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Most cardiac surgery clinical prediction models (CPMs) are developed using pre-operative variables to predict post-operative outcomes. Some CPMs are developed with intra-operative variables, but none are widely used. The objective of this systematic review was to identify CPMs with intra-operative variables that predict short-term outcomes following adult cardiac surgery. Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2022, for studies developing a CPM with at least one intra-operative variable. Data were extracted using a critical appraisal framework and bias assessment tool. Model performance was analysed using discrimination and calibration measures. A total of 24 models were identified. Frequent predicted outcomes were acute kidney injury (9/24 studies) and peri-operative mortality (6/24 studies). Frequent pre-operative variables were age (18/24 studies) and creatinine/eGFR (18/24 studies). Common intra-operative variables were cardiopulmonary bypass time (16/24 studies) and transfusion (13/24 studies). Model discrimination was acceptable for all internally validated models (AUC 0.69-0.91). Calibration was poor (15/24 studies) or unreported (8/24 studies). Most CPMs were at a high or indeterminate risk of bias (23/24 models). The added value of intra-operative variables was assessed in six studies with statistically significantly improved discrimination demonstrated in two. Weak reporting and methodological limitations may restrict wider applicability and adoption of existing CPMs that include intra-operative variables. There is some evidence that CPM discrimination is improved with the addition of intra-operative variables. Further work is required to understand the role of intra-operative CPMs in the management of cardiac surgery patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Most cardiac surgery clinical prediction models (CPMs) are developed using pre-operative variables to predict post-operative outcomes. Some CPMs are developed with intra-operative variables, but none are widely used. The objective of this systematic review was to identify CPMs with intra-operative variables that predict short-term outcomes following adult cardiac surgery.
METHODS METHODS
Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to December 2022, for studies developing a CPM with at least one intra-operative variable. Data were extracted using a critical appraisal framework and bias assessment tool. Model performance was analysed using discrimination and calibration measures.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 24 models were identified. Frequent predicted outcomes were acute kidney injury (9/24 studies) and peri-operative mortality (6/24 studies). Frequent pre-operative variables were age (18/24 studies) and creatinine/eGFR (18/24 studies). Common intra-operative variables were cardiopulmonary bypass time (16/24 studies) and transfusion (13/24 studies). Model discrimination was acceptable for all internally validated models (AUC 0.69-0.91). Calibration was poor (15/24 studies) or unreported (8/24 studies). Most CPMs were at a high or indeterminate risk of bias (23/24 models). The added value of intra-operative variables was assessed in six studies with statistically significantly improved discrimination demonstrated in two.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Weak reporting and methodological limitations may restrict wider applicability and adoption of existing CPMs that include intra-operative variables. There is some evidence that CPM discrimination is improved with the addition of intra-operative variables. Further work is required to understand the role of intra-operative CPMs in the management of cardiac surgery patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38649154
doi: 10.1177/02676591241237758
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2676591241237758

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Ceri Jones (C)

Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Department of Clinical Perfusion, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.

Marcus Taylor (M)

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester University Hospital Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe Hospital, , Manchester, UK.

Matthew Sperrin (M)

Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Stuart W Grant (SW)

Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, ERC, Manchester University Hospitals Foundation Trust, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
South Tees Academic Cardiovascular Unit, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK.

Classifications MeSH