Time-lapse imaging of morula compaction for selecting high-quality blastocysts: a retrospective cohort study.

Diameter Embryo quality Embryo selection Morula Time-lapse system

Journal

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 01 11 2023
accepted: 04 03 2024
medline: 23 4 2024
pubmed: 23 4 2024
entrez: 22 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Before blastocyst development, embryos undergo morphological and metabolic changes crucial for their subsequent growth. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between morula compaction and blastocyst formation and the subsequent chromosomal status of the embryos. This retrospective cohort study evaluated embryo development (n = 371) using time-lapse imaging; 94 blastocysts underwent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The embryos were classified as fully (Group 1, n = 194) or partially (Group 2, n = 177) compacted. Group 1 had significantly higher proportions of good- and average-quality blastocysts than Group 2 (21.6% vs. 3.4%, p = 0.001; 47.9% vs. 26.6%, p = 0.001, respectively). The time from the morula stage to the beginning and completion of compaction and blastocyst formation was significantly shorter in Group 1 than in Group 2 (78.6 vs. 82.4 h, p = 0.001; 87.0 vs. 92.2 h, p = 0.001; 100.2 vs. 103.7 h, p = 0.017, respectively). Group 1 embryos had larger surface areas than Group 2 embryos at various time points following blastocyst formation. Group 1 blastocysts had significantly higher average expansion rates than Group 2 blastocysts (653.6 vs. 499.2 μm Time-lapse microscopy uncovered a positive relationship between compaction and blastocyst quality and its association with embryo ploidy. Hence, compaction evaluation should be prioritized before blastocyst selection for transfer or cryopreservation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38649499
doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07461-x
pii: 10.1007/s00404-024-07461-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Korea Health Industry Development Institute
ID : HI21C1560020021
Pays : Republic of Korea

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Nagy ZP, Shapiro D, Chang CC (2020) Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 113:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009 pubmed: 32106970
Gardner DK, Meseguer M, Rubio C, Treff NR (2015) Diagnosis of human preimplantation embryo viability. Hum Reprod Update 21:727–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmu064
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmu064 pubmed: 25567750
Hill MJ, Eubanks AE, Csokmay JM, Christy AY, Jahandideh S, DeCherney AH, Devine K, Levens ED, Connell MT (2020) Is transferring a lower-quality embryo with a good-quality blastocyst detrimental to the likelihood of live birth? Fertil Steril 114:338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.027
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.03.027 pubmed: 32624214
Park JK, Ahn SY, Seok SH, Chang EM, Kim JW, Kwak IP, Lee WS (2022) Does post-warming extended culture duration affect the clinical and obstetric outcomes of patients of advanced maternal age? A single-center study. J Korean Med Sci 37:e96. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e96
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e96 pubmed: 35347904 pmcid: 8960938
Huang TT, Huang DH, Ahn HJ, Arnett C, Huang CT (2019) Early blastocyst expansion in euploid and aneuploid human embryos: evidence for a non-invasive and quantitative marker for embryo selection. Reprod Biomed Online 39:27–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.01.010
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.01.010 pubmed: 31130402
Coticchio G, Borini A, Zacà C, Makrakis E, Sfontouris I (2022) Fertilization signatures as biomarkers of embryo quality. Hum Reprod 37:1704–1711. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac123
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac123 pubmed: 35640036
Venturas M, Yang X, Sakkas D, Needleman D (2023) Noninvasive metabolic profiling of cumulus cells, oocytes, and embryos via fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy: a mini-review. Hum Reprod 38:799–810. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead063
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead063 pubmed: 37015098 pmcid: 10152178
Nguyen Q, Sommer S, Greene B, Wrenzycki C, Wagner U, Ziller V (2018) Effects of opening the incubator on morphokinetics in mouse embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 229:64–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.003
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.003 pubmed: 30107362
Lundin K, Park H (2020) Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection. Ups J Med Sci 125:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1728444
doi: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1728444 pubmed: 32096675 pmcid: 7720962
Boucret L, Tramon L, Saulnier P, Ferré-L’Hôtellier V, Bouet PE, May-Panloup P (2021) Change in the strategy of embryo selection with time-lapse system implementation-impact on clinical pregnancy rates. J Clin Med 10:4111. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184111
doi: 10.3390/jcm10184111 pubmed: 34575222 pmcid: 8471151
Sainte-Rose R, Petit C, Dijols L, Frapsauce C, Guerif F (2021) Extended embryo culture is effective for patients of an advanced maternal age. Sci Rep 11:13499. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92902-9
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92902-9 pubmed: 34188126 pmcid: 8242069
Ezoe K, Miki T, Akaike H, Shimazaki K, Takahashi T, Tanimura Y, Amagai A, Sawado A, Mogi M, Kaneko S, Ueno S, Coticchio G, Cimadomo D, Borini A, Rienzi L, Kato K (2023) Maternal age affects pronuclear and chromatin dynamics, morula compaction and cell polarity, and blastulation of human embryos. Hum Reprod 38:387–399. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead001
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead001 pubmed: 36644923
Kim HJ, Park JK, Eum JH, Song H, Lee WS, Lyu SW (2021) Embryo selection based on morphological parameters in a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycle. Reprod Sci 28:1060–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00349-6
doi: 10.1007/s43032-020-00349-6 pubmed: 33051819
Van de Velde H, De Vos A, Joris H, Nagy ZP, Van Steirteghem AC (1998) Effect of timing of oocyte denudation and micro-injection on survival, fertilization and embryo quality after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 13:3160–3164. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.11.3160
doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.11.3160 pubmed: 9853875
Park JK, Ahn SY, Seok SH, Park SY, Bang S, Eum JH, Kwak IP, Kim JW, Lee WS (2022) Clinical usability of embryo development using a combined qualitative and quantitative approach in a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: assessment of pre-vitrified blastocyst diameter and post-warmed blastocyst re-expansion speed. J Clin Med 11:7085. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11237085
doi: 10.3390/jcm11237085 pubmed: 36498659 pmcid: 9736480
Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine and ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology (2011) The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod 26:1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037
doi: 10.1093/humrep/der037
ESHRE Working Group on Time-Lapse Technology, Apter S, Ebner T, Freour T, Guns Y, Kovacic B, Le Clef N, Marques M, Meseguer M, Montjean D, Sfontouris I (2020) Good practice recommendations for the use of time-lapse technology. Hum Reprod Open 2020:hoaa008. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa008
Kim MK, Park JK, Jeon Y, Choe SA, Lee HJ, Kim J, Chang EM, Kim JW, Lyu SW, Kim JY, Kwak IP, Lee WS, Yoon TK (2019) Correlation between morphologic grading and euploidy rates of blastocysts, and clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization preimplantation genetic screening. J Korean Med Sci 34:e27. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e27
doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e27 pubmed: 30686949 pmcid: 6345636
Hur C, Nanavaty V, Yao M, Desai N (2023) The presence of partial compaction patterns is associated with lower rates of blastocyst formation, sub-optimal morphokinetic parameters and poorer morphologic grade. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 21(1):12
doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01059-9 pubmed: 36709281 pmcid: 9883889
Lensen S, Lantsberg D, Gardner DK, Sophian AD, Wandafiana N, Kamath MS (2022) The role of timing in frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 118:832–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.009
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.009 pubmed: 36150920
Venturas M, Shah JS, Yang X, Sanchez TH, Conway W, Sakkas D, Needleman DJ (2022) Metabolic state of human blastocysts measured by fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy. Hum Reprod 37:411–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab283
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab283 pubmed: 34999823
Bebbere D, Coticchio G, Borini A, Ledda S (2022) Oocyte aging: looking beyond chromosome segregation errors. J Assist Reprod Genet 39:793–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02441-z
doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02441-z pubmed: 35212880 pmcid: 9051005
Haas J, Meriano J, Bassil R, Barzilay E, Zilberberg E, Casper RF (2019) Developmental potential of slow-developing embryos: day-5 morulae compared with day-5 cavitating morulae. Fertil Steril 111:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.053 pubmed: 30442415
Coticchio G, Barrie A, Lagalla C, Borini A, Fishel S, Griffin D, Campbell A (2021) Plasticity of the human preimplantation embryo: developmental dogmas, variations on themes and self-correction. Hum Reprod Update 27:848–865. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmab016
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmab016 pubmed: 34131722
Coticchio G, Lagalla C, Sturmey R, Pennetta F, Borini A (2019) The enigmatic morula: mechanisms of development, cell fate determination, self-correction and implications for ART. Hum Reprod Update 25:422–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz008
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz008 pubmed: 30855681
Ivec M, Kovacic B, Vlaisavljevic V (2011) Prediction of human blastocyst development from morulas with delayed and/or incomplete compaction. Fertil Steril 96:1473–1478.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.015
Lagalla C, Tarozzi N, Sciajno R, Wells D, Di Santo M, Nadalini M, Distratis V, Borini A (2017) Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 34:137–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008 pubmed: 27938863
Lagalla C, Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Tarozzi N, Zacà C, Borini A (2020) Alternative patterns of partial embryo compaction: prevalence, morphokinetic history and possible implications. Reprod Biomed Online 40:347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.011
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.011 pubmed: 32057674
Tao J, Tamis R, Fink K, Williams B, Nelson-White T, Craig R (2002) The neglected morula/compact stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 17:1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.6.1513
doi: 10.1093/humrep/17.6.1513 pubmed: 12042270
Yang H, Liu Y, Niu W, Yang Z, Wang Y, Jin H, Li G (2023) Correlation study of male semen parameters and embryo aneuploidy in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:1072176. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1072176
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1072176 pubmed: 36778601
Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliott T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM (2014) Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29:1173–1181. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu033
doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033 pubmed: 24578475
Shi W, Zhou H, Chen L, Xue X, Shi J (2022) Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher in high-grade day 6 blastocysts than in low-grade day 5 blastocysts. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 13:1066757. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2022.1066757
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1066757 pubmed: 36686429
Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Okimura T, Yabuuchi A, Kobayashi T, Kato K (2020) Establishment of day 7 blastocyst freezing criteria using blastocyst diameter for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer from live birth outcomes: a single-center, large cohort, retrospectively matched study. J Assist Reprod Genet 37:2327–2335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01882-8
doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01882-8 pubmed: 32691193 pmcid: 7492317
Hur C, Nanavaty V, Yao M, Desai N (2023) The presence of partial compaction patterns is associated with lower rates of blastocyst formation, sub-optimal morphokinetic parameters and poorer morphologic grade. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 21:12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01059-9
doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01059-9 pubmed: 36709281 pmcid: 9883889
Venturas M, Yang X, Kumar K, Wells D, Racowsky C, Needleman DJ (2021) Metabolic imaging of human cumulus cells reveals associations among metabolic profiles of cumulus cells, patient clinical factors, and oocyte maturity. Fertil Steril 116:1651–1662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1204
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1204 pubmed: 34481639 pmcid: 8627436
Richani D, Dunning KR, Thompson JG, Gilchrist RB (2021) Metabolic co-dependence of the oocyte and cumulus cells: essential role in determining oocyte developmental competence. Hum Reprod Update 27:27–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa043
doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa043 pubmed: 33020823
Guo YH, Liu Y, Qi L, Song WY, Jin HX (2021) Can time-lapse incubation and monitoring be beneficial to assisted reproduction technology outcomes? A randomized controlled trial using day 3 double embryo transfer. Front Physiol 12:794601. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.794601
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.794601 pubmed: 35058802
Zhao J, Yan Y, Huang X, Sun L, Li Y (2019) Blastocoele expansion: an important parameter for predicting clinical success pregnancy after frozen-warmed blastocysts transfer. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 17:15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0454-2
doi: 10.1186/s12958-019-0454-2 pubmed: 30674332 pmcid: 6344998

Auteurs

Jae Kyun Park (JK)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea.

Yunmi Jeon (Y)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea.

Soyoung Bang (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea.

Ji Won Kim (JW)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea. happyjiwon@chamc.co.kr.

In Pyung Kwak (IP)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea.

Woo Sik Lee (WS)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, 566 Nonhyeon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06135, Korea. wooslee_de@chamc.co.kr.

Classifications MeSH