Geographic disparities in telemedicine mental health use by applying three way ANOVA on Medicaid claims population data.

Health disparities Healthcare access Mental health Telemedicine

Journal

BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 07 03 2023
accepted: 26 03 2024
medline: 23 4 2024
pubmed: 23 4 2024
entrez: 22 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Utilization of telemedicine care for vulnerable and low income populations, especially individuals with mental health conditions, is not well understood. The goal is to describe the utilization and regional disparities of telehealth care by mental health status in Texas. Texas Medicaid claims data were analyzed from September 1, 2012, to August 31, 2018 for Medicaid patients enrolled due to a disability. We analyzed the growth in telemedicine care based on urban, suburban, and rural, and mental health status. We used t-tests to test for differences in sociodemographic characteristics across patients and performed a three-way Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) to evaluate whether the growth rates from 2013 to 2018 were different based on geography and patient type. We then estimated patient level multivariable ordinary least square regression models to estimate the relationship between the use of telemedicine and patient characteristics in 2013 and separately in 2018. Outcome was a binary variable of telemedicine use or not. Independent variables of interest include geography, age, gender, race, ethnicity, plan type, Medicare eligibility, diagnosed mental health condition, and ECI score. Overall, Medicaid patients with a telemedicine visit grew at 81%, with rural patients growing the fastest (181%). Patients with a telemedicine visit for a mental health condition grew by 77%. Telemedicine patients with mental health diagnoses tended to have 2 to 3 more visits per year compared to non-telemedicine patients with mental health diagnoses. In 2013, multivariable regressions display that urban and suburban patients, those that had a mental health diagnosis were more likely to use telemedicine, while patients that were younger, women, Hispanics, and those dual eligible were less likely to use telemedicine. By 2018, urban and suburban patients were less likely to use telemedicine. Growth in telemedicine care was strong in urban and rural areas between 2013 and 2018 even before the COVID-19 pandemic. Those with a mental health condition who received telemedicine care had a higher number of total mental health visits compared to those without telemedicine care. These findings hold across all geographic groups and suggest that mental health telemedicine visits did not substitute for face-to-face mental health visits.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Utilization of telemedicine care for vulnerable and low income populations, especially individuals with mental health conditions, is not well understood. The goal is to describe the utilization and regional disparities of telehealth care by mental health status in Texas. Texas Medicaid claims data were analyzed from September 1, 2012, to August 31, 2018 for Medicaid patients enrolled due to a disability.
METHODS METHODS
We analyzed the growth in telemedicine care based on urban, suburban, and rural, and mental health status. We used t-tests to test for differences in sociodemographic characteristics across patients and performed a three-way Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) to evaluate whether the growth rates from 2013 to 2018 were different based on geography and patient type. We then estimated patient level multivariable ordinary least square regression models to estimate the relationship between the use of telemedicine and patient characteristics in 2013 and separately in 2018. Outcome was a binary variable of telemedicine use or not. Independent variables of interest include geography, age, gender, race, ethnicity, plan type, Medicare eligibility, diagnosed mental health condition, and ECI score.
RESULTS RESULTS
Overall, Medicaid patients with a telemedicine visit grew at 81%, with rural patients growing the fastest (181%). Patients with a telemedicine visit for a mental health condition grew by 77%. Telemedicine patients with mental health diagnoses tended to have 2 to 3 more visits per year compared to non-telemedicine patients with mental health diagnoses. In 2013, multivariable regressions display that urban and suburban patients, those that had a mental health diagnosis were more likely to use telemedicine, while patients that were younger, women, Hispanics, and those dual eligible were less likely to use telemedicine. By 2018, urban and suburban patients were less likely to use telemedicine.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Growth in telemedicine care was strong in urban and rural areas between 2013 and 2018 even before the COVID-19 pandemic. Those with a mental health condition who received telemedicine care had a higher number of total mental health visits compared to those without telemedicine care. These findings hold across all geographic groups and suggest that mental health telemedicine visits did not substitute for face-to-face mental health visits.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38649985
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10898-0
pii: 10.1186/s12913-024-10898-0
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

494

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Patel SY, Huskamp HA, Busch AB, Mehrotra A. Telemental Health and US Rural-Urban Differences in Specialty Mental Health Use, 2010–2017. Am J Public Health. 2020;110(9):1308–14. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305657 .
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305657 pubmed: 32673109 pmcid: 7427215
Rodriguez JA, Betancourt JR, Sequist TD, Ganguli I. Differences in the Use of Telephone and Video Telemedicine visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27(1):21–6. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88573 .
doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88573 pubmed: 33471458 pmcid: 10877492
Sheet F. Telehealth. American Hospital Association. Accessed September 2, 2021. https://www.aha.org/system/files/2019-02/fact-sheet-telehealth-2-4-19.pdf .
Friedman AB, Gervasi S, Song H, et al. Telemedicine catches on: changes in the utilization of telemedicine services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Manag Care. 2022;28(1):e1–6. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2022.88771 .
doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2022.88771 pubmed: 35049260
Cost Effectiveness of Telemedicine for the Delivery of Outpatient Pulmonary Care to a Rural Population | Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/15305620260353171 .
Zupa MF, Piette JD, Stoll SC, et al. Predictors of Engagement in a Telehealth intervention for adults with type 2 diabetes and a family supporter. Am J Manag Care. 2021;27(10):409–14. https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2021.88758 .
doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88758 pubmed: 34668669 pmcid: 8717139
Bernstein P, Ko KJ, Israni J, et al. Urgent and non-emergent telehealth care for seniors: findings from a multi-site impact study. J Telemed Telecare. 2023;29(7):566–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211004321 .
doi: 10.1177/1357633X211004321 pubmed: 33866894
Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19 | NEJM. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmp2003539 .
Ashwood JS, Mehrotra A, Cowling D, Uscher-Pines L. Direct-To-Consumer Telehealth May increase Access To Care but does not decrease spending. Health Aff. 2017;36(3):485–91. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130 .
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130
Connolly SL, Miller CJ, Gifford AL, Charness ME. Perceptions and use of Telehealth among Mental Health, Primary, and Specialty Care clinicians during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2216401. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16401 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.16401 pubmed: 35671053 pmcid: 9175071
Friedman RSC, Carpenter DM, Shaver JM, McDermott SC, Voelkel J. Telemedicine Familiarity and Post-disaster Utilization of Emergency and Hospital Services for ambulatory care sensitive conditions. Am J Prev Med. 2022;63(1):e1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.12.025 pubmed: 35300889
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. State Medicaid & CHIP Telehealth Toolkit, Policy Considerations for States Expanding Use of Telehealth, COVID-19 Version. Accessed September 2. 2021. https://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid/benefits/downloads/medicaid-chip-telehealth-toolkit.pdf .
Chu RC, Peters C, Lew ND, Sommers BD. State Medicaid Telehealth Policies Before and During the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency. Published online 2021.
Healthcare Statistics | Texas Health and Human Services. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://www.hhs.texas.gov/about/records-statistics/data-statistics/healthcare-statistics .
1994 US, Code. Title 42 - the public health and welfare:: chapter 6 - the children’s bureau :: subchapter xvi_2 - subchapter xvi-supplemental security income for aged, blind, and disabled :: Part A - Determination of Benefits:: Sec. 1382c - Definitions. Justia Law. Published February 28, 2024. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://law.justia.com/codes/us/1994/title42/chap6/subchapxvi_2/parta/sec1382c .
Taking Away Medicaid for Not Meeting Work Requirements Harms People with Mental Health Conditions | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Published March 6. 2018. Accessed February 23, 2024. https://www.cbpp.org/research/health/harm-to-people-with-mental-health-conditions-from-taking-away-medicaid-for-not .
Patterns of Telehealth Use Among Rural Medicaid Beneficiaries - Talbot– 2019 - The Journal of Rural Health - Wiley Online Library. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/ https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12324 .
Ray KN, Mehrotra A, Yabes JG, Kahn JM. Telemedicine and Outpatient Subspecialty visits among Pediatric Medicaid beneficiaries. Acad Pediatr. 2020;20(5):642–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2020.03.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2020.03.014 pubmed: 32278078 pmcid: 7194998
Van Walraven C, Oake N, Jennings A, Forster AJ. The association between continuity of care and outcomes: a systematic and critical review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010;16(5):947–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01235.x pubmed: 20553366
Medicaid Managed Care in Texas. Published online 2018. Accessed February 10, 2024. https://www.lbb.texas.gov/Documents/Publications/Presentation/5414_HAC_Medicaid.pdf .
telehealth for behavioral health care | Telehealth.HHS.gov. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/best-practice-guides/telehealth-for-behavioral-health .
Sloan KL, Montez-Rath ME, Spiro A, et al. Development and validation of a Psychiatric Case-Mix System. Med Care. 2006;44(6):568–80.
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215819.76050.a1 pubmed: 16708006
USDA ERS - Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx .
Jain T, Mehrotra A. Comparison of direct-to-consumer Telemedicine visits with primary care visits. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2028392. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28392 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.28392 pubmed: 33289842 pmcid: 7724555
Andrilla CHA, Patterson DG, Garberson LA, Coulthard C, Larson EH. Geographic Variation in the Supply of Selected Behavioral Health Providers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2018;54(6, Supplement 3):S199-S207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.004 .
Gilman M, Stensland J. Telehealth and Medicare: payment policy, current use, and prospects for growth. Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013;3(4):mmrr. 003.04.a04.
doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.04.a04 pmcid: 4011650
Medicare payment policies during COVID-19. Accessed September 2. 2021. https://telehealth.hhs.gov/providers/billing-and-reimbursement/medicare-payment-policies-during-covid-19/ .
Patel SY, Mehrotra A, Huskamp HA, Uscher-Pines L, Ganguli I, Barnett ML. Trends in Outpatient Care Delivery and Telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(3):388–91. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928 .
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.5928 pubmed: 33196765
Bressman E, Werner RM, Cullen D, et al. Expiration of State Licensure waivers and out-of-state Telemedicine relationships. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(11):e2343697. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43697 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43697 pubmed: 37966842 pmcid: 10652155
Health care use - Doctors’ consultations - OECD Data. Accessed February 23. 2024. https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/doctors-consultations.htm .

Auteurs

Benjamin Ukert (B)

Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Mark Lawley (M)

Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.

Hye-Chung Kum (HC)

Population Informatics Lab, Department of Health Policy and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA. kum@tamu.edu.

Classifications MeSH