Second-line therapies for steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors Immune-related adverse events Second-line immunosuppressants Steroid-dependent Steroid-refractory

Journal

European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
ISSN: 1879-0852
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9005373

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Mar 2024
Historique:
received: 10 01 2024
revised: 03 03 2024
accepted: 12 03 2024
medline: 24 4 2024
pubmed: 24 4 2024
entrez: 23 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce adverse events (irAEs) that do not respond to steroids, i.e. steroid-refractory (sr) irAEs, and irAEs in which steroids cannot be tapered, i.e. steroid-dependent (sd) irAEs, in about 10% of cases. An evidence-based analysis of the effectiveness of second-line immunosuppressive agents with regard to irAE and tumor control is lacking. The international web-based Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO; http://serio-registry.org) is a collaborative initiative with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute to document rare, severe, complex or therapy-refractory immunotherapy-induced side effects. The registry was queried on August 1, 2023 for cases of irAEs which were treated with second-line therapies. From a total of 1330 cases, 217 patients (16.3%) received 249 second-line therapies. A total of 19 different second-line therapies were employed, including TNF-alpha antagonists (46.5%), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG; 19.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (15.9%), and methotrexate (3.6%). Therapy choices were determined by the type of irAE. The time to onset of sr-/sd-irAEs after ICI initiation did not consistently differ from steroid-responsive irAEs. While 74.3% of sr-/sd-irAEs resolved and 13.1% had improved, 4.3% persisted, 3.9% resulted in permanent sequelae, and 4.3% in death with ongoing symptoms. Infliximab exhibited potential for earlier symptom improvement compared to mycophenolate mofetil or IVIG. Tumor response in patients with second-line treated sd-/sr-irAE was similar to patients with irAEs treated with steroids only. Several second-line therapies are effective against sr-/sd-irAEs, the second-line therapies show no clear negative impact on tumor response, and infliximab shows potential for faster improvement of symptoms. However, prospective comparative data are needed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce adverse events (irAEs) that do not respond to steroids, i.e. steroid-refractory (sr) irAEs, and irAEs in which steroids cannot be tapered, i.e. steroid-dependent (sd) irAEs, in about 10% of cases. An evidence-based analysis of the effectiveness of second-line immunosuppressive agents with regard to irAE and tumor control is lacking.
METHODS METHODS
The international web-based Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO; http://serio-registry.org) is a collaborative initiative with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute to document rare, severe, complex or therapy-refractory immunotherapy-induced side effects. The registry was queried on August 1, 2023 for cases of irAEs which were treated with second-line therapies.
RESULTS RESULTS
From a total of 1330 cases, 217 patients (16.3%) received 249 second-line therapies. A total of 19 different second-line therapies were employed, including TNF-alpha antagonists (46.5%), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG; 19.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (15.9%), and methotrexate (3.6%). Therapy choices were determined by the type of irAE. The time to onset of sr-/sd-irAEs after ICI initiation did not consistently differ from steroid-responsive irAEs. While 74.3% of sr-/sd-irAEs resolved and 13.1% had improved, 4.3% persisted, 3.9% resulted in permanent sequelae, and 4.3% in death with ongoing symptoms. Infliximab exhibited potential for earlier symptom improvement compared to mycophenolate mofetil or IVIG. Tumor response in patients with second-line treated sd-/sr-irAE was similar to patients with irAEs treated with steroids only.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Several second-line therapies are effective against sr-/sd-irAEs, the second-line therapies show no clear negative impact on tumor response, and infliximab shows potential for faster improvement of symptoms. However, prospective comparative data are needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38652976
pii: S0959-8049(24)00684-1
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114028
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114028

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Auteurs

Theresa Ruf (T)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; SERIO registry.

Rafaela Kramer (R)

Department of Dermatology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; SERIO registry.

Andrea Forschner (A)

Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Ulrike Leiter (U)

Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Friedegund Meier (F)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany.

Lydia Reinhardt (L)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Germany.

Pia Dücker (P)

Department of Dermatology, Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.

Carolin Ertl (C)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; SERIO registry.

Dirk Tomsitz (D)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Julia K Tietze (JK)

Clinic for Dermatology and Venerology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Ralf Gutzmer (R)

Department of Dermatology, Johannes Wesling Medical Center, Ruhr-University Bochum, Minden, Germany.

Evelyn Dabrowski (E)

Clinic Ludwigshafen, Ludwigshafen, Germany.

Lisa Zimmer (L)

Department of Dermatology, Essen University Hospital, West German Cancer Center, University of Duisburg-Essen and the German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Essen/Düsseldorf, Germany.

Anja Gesierich (A)

Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany.

Sarah Zierold (S)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; SERIO registry.

Lars E French (LE)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Dr. Philip Frost Department of Dermatology & Cutaneous Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.

Thomas Eigentler (T)

Department of Dermatology, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Teresa Amaral (T)

Department of Dermatology, Eberhard-Karls-University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180), Tübingen, Germany.

Lucie Heinzerling (L)

Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Dermatology, University Clinic Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; SERIO registry. Electronic address: Lucie.Heinzerling@med.uni-muenchen.de.

Classifications MeSH