Rectovaginal Fistula: What is the Role of Martius Flap and Gracilis Muscle Interposition in the Therapeutic Strategy?
Journal
Diseases of the colon and rectum
ISSN: 1530-0358
Titre abrégé: Dis Colon Rectum
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372764
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Apr 2024
23 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline:
24
4
2024
pubmed:
24
4
2024
entrez:
23
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
While numerous treatments exist for management of rectovaginal fistula, none has demonstrated its superiority. The role of diverting stoma remains controversial. Few series include Martius flap in the armamentarium. Determine the role of gracilis muscle interposition and Martius flap in the surgical management of rectovaginal fistula. Retrospective cohort study of a pooled prospectively maintained database from 3 centers. All consecutive eligible patients with rectovaginal fistula undergoing Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition were included from 2001 to 2022. Success was defined by absence of stoma and rectovaginal fistula. Sixty-two patients were included with 55 Martius flap and 24 gracilis muscle interposition performed after failures of 164 initial procedures. Total length of stay was longer for gracilis muscle interposition by 2 days (p = 0.01) without a significant difference in severe morbidity (20% vs. 12%, p = 0.53). 27% of Martius flap were performed without stoma, without impact on overall morbidity (p = 0.763). Per-patient immediate success rates were not significantly different between groups (35% vs. 31%, p = 1.0). Success of gracilis muscle interposition after failure of Martius flap was not significantly different from an initial gracilis muscle interposition (p = 1.0). The immediate success rate rose to 49.4% (49% vs. 50%, p = 1.0) after simple perineal procedures. After a median follow-up of 23 months, there was no significant difference detected in success rate between the two procedures (69% vs. 69%, p = 1.0). Smoking was the only negative predictive factor (p = 0.02). By its retrospective nature, this study is limited in its comparison. This novel comparison between Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition suggests that Martius flap presents several advantages, including shorter length of stay, similar morbidity, and success. Proximal diversion via a stoma for Martius flap does not appear mandatory. Gracilis muscle interposition could be reserved as a salvage procedure after Martius flap failure. See Video Abstract.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
While numerous treatments exist for management of rectovaginal fistula, none has demonstrated its superiority. The role of diverting stoma remains controversial. Few series include Martius flap in the armamentarium.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Determine the role of gracilis muscle interposition and Martius flap in the surgical management of rectovaginal fistula.
DESIGN
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study of a pooled prospectively maintained database from 3 centers.
SETTINGS/PATIENTS
UNASSIGNED
All consecutive eligible patients with rectovaginal fistula undergoing Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition were included from 2001 to 2022.
MAIN OUTCOMES
RESULTS
Success was defined by absence of stoma and rectovaginal fistula.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Sixty-two patients were included with 55 Martius flap and 24 gracilis muscle interposition performed after failures of 164 initial procedures. Total length of stay was longer for gracilis muscle interposition by 2 days (p = 0.01) without a significant difference in severe morbidity (20% vs. 12%, p = 0.53). 27% of Martius flap were performed without stoma, without impact on overall morbidity (p = 0.763). Per-patient immediate success rates were not significantly different between groups (35% vs. 31%, p = 1.0). Success of gracilis muscle interposition after failure of Martius flap was not significantly different from an initial gracilis muscle interposition (p = 1.0). The immediate success rate rose to 49.4% (49% vs. 50%, p = 1.0) after simple perineal procedures. After a median follow-up of 23 months, there was no significant difference detected in success rate between the two procedures (69% vs. 69%, p = 1.0). Smoking was the only negative predictive factor (p = 0.02).
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSIONS
By its retrospective nature, this study is limited in its comparison.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This novel comparison between Martius flap and gracilis muscle interposition suggests that Martius flap presents several advantages, including shorter length of stay, similar morbidity, and success. Proximal diversion via a stoma for Martius flap does not appear mandatory. Gracilis muscle interposition could be reserved as a salvage procedure after Martius flap failure. See Video Abstract.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38653492
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003148
pii: 00003453-990000000-00625
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © The ASCRS 2024.