Safety and efficacy of East Asian herbal medicine for iron deficiency anemia in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

children herbal medicine iron deficiency anemia meta-analysis systematic review treatment

Journal

Frontiers in pharmacology
ISSN: 1663-9812
Titre abrégé: Front Pharmacol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101548923

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 13 12 2023
accepted: 25 03 2024
medline: 24 4 2024
pubmed: 24 4 2024
entrez: 24 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of East Asian herbal medicine (HM) for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in children and adolescents. Twelve electronic databases were searched in 28 May 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of HM in children with IDA. The primary outcome measures for treatment included blood hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels, whereas the secondary outcomes included the total effective rate (TER), incidence of adverse events (AEs), average healing time, and hematologic indicators related to IDA. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and R studio 4.3 software, and subgroup analyses were performed according to the different groups (type of intervention and duration of treatment). The effect size measures used were the risk ratio, mean difference, and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tools. The meta-analysis included 28 studies. Five studies compared the efficacy of HM alone with that of oral iron alone, whereas 23 compared the efficacy of a combination of HM and oral iron with that of oral iron alone. The meta-analysis revealed that the HM treatment group showed significant improvements in all outcome measures compared to those observed in the oral iron group. Moreover, HM significantly reduced the incidence of gastrointestinal AE, compared to that associated with oral iron. Among the 28 studies, the most commonly used HM prescription was Xingpi Yanger Granules, and the most commonly used botanical drug was This meta-analysis identified evidence of the efficacy and safety of HM in children with IDA. Compared to conventional oral iron therapy, HM improved IDA-related blood markers and TER, with fewer AEs and shorter mean healing times. However, further well-designed, large-scale clinical trials are necessary to strengthen the evidence of the efficacy and safety of botanical drugs. PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022334670. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022334670).

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of East Asian herbal medicine (HM) for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in children and adolescents.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Twelve electronic databases were searched in 28 May 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of HM in children with IDA. The primary outcome measures for treatment included blood hemoglobin and serum ferritin levels, whereas the secondary outcomes included the total effective rate (TER), incidence of adverse events (AEs), average healing time, and hematologic indicators related to IDA. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 and R studio 4.3 software, and subgroup analyses were performed according to the different groups (type of intervention and duration of treatment). The effect size measures used were the risk ratio, mean difference, and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was assessed using a revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials, and the quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tools.
Results UNASSIGNED
The meta-analysis included 28 studies. Five studies compared the efficacy of HM alone with that of oral iron alone, whereas 23 compared the efficacy of a combination of HM and oral iron with that of oral iron alone. The meta-analysis revealed that the HM treatment group showed significant improvements in all outcome measures compared to those observed in the oral iron group. Moreover, HM significantly reduced the incidence of gastrointestinal AE, compared to that associated with oral iron. Among the 28 studies, the most commonly used HM prescription was Xingpi Yanger Granules, and the most commonly used botanical drug was
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This meta-analysis identified evidence of the efficacy and safety of HM in children with IDA. Compared to conventional oral iron therapy, HM improved IDA-related blood markers and TER, with fewer AEs and shorter mean healing times. However, further well-designed, large-scale clinical trials are necessary to strengthen the evidence of the efficacy and safety of botanical drugs.
Systematic Review Registration UNASSIGNED
PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022334670. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022334670).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38655186
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1339486
pii: 1339486
pmc: PMC11036862
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

1339486

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Jeong, Kim, Lee, Bang and Chang.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6
pubmed: 18436948
Am Fam Physician. 2016 Feb 15;93(4):270-8
pubmed: 26926814
J Med Food. 2009 Jun;12(3):637-42
pubmed: 19627214
J Intern Med. 2020 Feb;287(2):153-170
pubmed: 31665543
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563
BMJ. 2008 May 3;336(7651):995-8
pubmed: 18456631
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 10;12(1):19170
pubmed: 36357664
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 14;10(20):10916-10921
pubmed: 33144936
Indian J Pediatr. 2015 Jun;82(6):558-64
pubmed: 25636824
Zhong Yao Cai. 2006 Jun;29(6):574-6
pubmed: 17039881
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898
pubmed: 31462531
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Apr;63(4):743-5
pubmed: 26728130
Chin Med J (Engl). 1987 Aug;100(8):654-7
pubmed: 3129247
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 03;13:1029641
pubmed: 36408243

Auteurs

Yoon Kyoung Jeong (YK)

Department of Korean Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Jae Hyun Kim (JH)

Jeongseon Public Health Center, Gangwon-do, Republic of Korea.

Sun Haeng Lee (SH)

Department of Korean Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Miran Bang (M)

Department of Korean Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Gyu Tae Chang (GT)

Department of Korean Pediatrics, College of Korean Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Classifications MeSH