Impact of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation on language production in adult classic galactosemia patients.

P300 classic galactosemia event related potentials language production late positivity theta time frequency transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Journal

Journal of inherited metabolic disease
ISSN: 1573-2665
Titre abrégé: J Inherit Metab Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7910918

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 19 03 2024
received: 27 10 2023
accepted: 04 04 2024
medline: 25 4 2024
pubmed: 25 4 2024
entrez: 25 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with classic galactosemia (CG), an inborn error of galactose metabolism, suffer from impairments in cognition, including language processing. Potential causes are atypical brain oscillations. Recent electroencephalogram (EEG) showed differences in the P300 event-related-potential (ERP) and alterations in the alpha/theta-range during speech planning. This study investigated whether transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) at theta-frequency compared to sham can cause a normalization of the ERP post stimulation and improves language performance. Eleven CG patients and fourteen healthy controls participated in two tACS-sessions (theta 6.5 Hz/sham). They were engaged in an active language task, describing animated scenes at three moments, that is, pre/during/post stimulation. Pre and post stimulation, behavior (naming accuracy, voice-onset-times; VOT) and mean-amplitudes of ERP were compared, by means of a P300 time-window analysis and cluster-based-permutation testing during speech planning. The results showed that theta stimulation, not sham, significantly reduced naming error-percentage in patients, not in controls. Theta did not systematically speed up naming beyond a general learning effect, which was larger for the patients. The EEG analysis revealed a significant pre-post stimulation effect (P300/late positivity), in patients and during theta stimulation only. In conclusion, theta-tACS improved accuracy in language performance in CG patients compared to controls and altered the P300 and late positive ERP-amplitude, suggesting a lasting effect on neural oscillation and behavior.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38659221
doi: 10.1002/jimd.12742
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : Galactosemia Foundation
ID : 2019

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of SSIEM.

Références

Doyle CM, Channon S, Orlowska D, Lee PJ. The neuropsychological profile of galactosaemia. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2010;33:603‐609.
Potter NL, Nievergelt Y, Shriberg LD. Motor and speech disorders in classic galactosemia. JIMD Rep. 2013;11:31‐41.
Rubio‐Gozalbo ME, Haskovic M, Bosch AM, et al. The natural history of classic galactosemia: lessons from the GalNet registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:86.
Timmers I, Jansma BM, Rubio‐Gozalbo ME. From mind to mouth: event related potentials of sentence production in classic galactosemia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e52826.
Bock K. Sentence production: from mind to mouth. In: Miller J, Eimas P, eds. Speech, Language, and Communication Handbook of Perception and Cognition. Academic Press; 1995:181‐216.
Levelt WJ, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci. 1999;22:1‐38. discussion 38‐75.
Levelt WJ, Speaking M. From Intention to Articulation. The MITPress; 1989.
Matchin W, Hickok G. The cortical organization of syntax. Cereb Cortex. 2020;30:1481‐1498.
Ganushchak LY, Christoffels IK, Schiller NO. The use of electroencephalography in language production research: a review. Front Psychol. 2011;2:208.
Marek A, Habets B, Jansma BM, Nager W, Münte TF. Neural correlates of conceptualisation difficulty during the preparation of complex utterances. Aphasiology. 2007;21:1147‐1156.
Timmers I, Gentile F, Rubio‐Gozalbo ME, Jansma BM. Temporal characteristics of online syntactic sentence planning: an event‐related potential study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e82884.
Basar‐Eroglu C, Basar E, Demiralp T, Schurmann M. P300‐response: possible psychophysiological correlates in delta and theta frequency channels. A review. Int J Psychophysiol. 1992;13:161‐179.
Fuster JM, Bressler SL. Cognit activation: a mechanism enabling temporal integration in working memory. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:207‐218.
Piai V, Zheng X. Speaking waves: Neuronal oscillations in language production. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Elsevier Academic Press; 2019:265‐302.
Mazzini S, Yadnik S, Timmers I, Rubio‐Gozalbo E, Jansma BM. Altered neural oscillations in classical galactosaemia during sentence production. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2024. doi:10.1002/jimd.12740
Vosskuhl J, Struber D, Herrmann CS. Non‐invasive brain stimulation: a paradigm shift in understanding brain oscillations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018;12:211.
He Y, Liu S, Chen L, Ke Y, Ming D. Neurophysiological mechanisms of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Front Neurosci. 2023;17:1091925.
Scrivener CL, Reader AT. Variability of EEG electrode positions and their underlying brain regions: visualizing gel artifacts from a simultaneous EEG‐fMRI dataset. Brain Behav. 2022;12:e2476.
Jasper H. The 10‐20 electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuropysiol. 1958;10:370‐375.
IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. IBM Corp; 2020.
Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single‐trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:9‐21.
Struber D, Rach S, Neuling T, Herrmann CS. On the possible role of stimulation duration for after‐effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci. 2015;9:311.
Alekseichuck I, Pabel SC, Antal A. Paulus W (2017) Intrahemispheric theta rhythm desynchronization impairs working memory. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35:147‐158.
Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(10):2128‐2148.
Hajcak G, Foti D. Significance?… Significance! Empirical, methodological, and theoretical connections between the late positive potential and P300 as neural responses to stimulus significance: an integrative review. Psychophysiology. 2020;57:e13570.
Timmers I, Zhang H, Bastiani M, Jansma BM, Roebroeck A, Rubio‐Gozalbo ME. White matter microstructure pathology in classic galactosemia revealed by neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2015;38:295‐304.

Auteurs

Britt Derks (B)

Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
European Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Disorders (MetabERN) Member and United for Metabolic Diseases Member, Udine, Italy.

Varsha Shashi Kumar (VS)

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Sai Yadnik (S)

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Bianca Panis (B)

Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
European Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Disorders (MetabERN) Member and United for Metabolic Diseases Member, Udine, Italy.

Annet M Bosch (AM)

Department of Paediatrics, Division of Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Inborn errors of metabolism, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

David Cassiman (D)

Department of Gastroenterology-Hepatology and Adult Metabolic Center, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Mirian C H Janssen (MCH)

Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Teresa Schuhmann (T)

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

M Estela Rubio-Gozalbo (ME)

Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, MosaKids Children's Hospital, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
GROW, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
European Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Disorders (MetabERN) Member and United for Metabolic Diseases Member, Udine, Italy.

Bernadette M Jansma (BM)

Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht Brain Imaging Centre (MBIC), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH