Systemic antibiotic treatment of cows with metritis early postpartum does not change the progression of uterine disease or the uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum.

Microbiome antibiotics ceftiofur uterus

Journal

Research square
Titre abrégé: Res Sq
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768035

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Apr 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 25 4 2024
medline: 25 4 2024
entrez: 25 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Postpartum uterine disease (metritis) is common in dairy cows. The disease develops within 1 week after calving and is associated with microbial dysbiosis, fever, and fetid uterine discharge. Cows with metritis have a greater likelihood of developing endometritis and infertility later postpartum. Antibiotic treatment is used to relieve symptoms of metritis but the capacity of antibiotic treatment to improve fertility later postpartum is inconsistent across published studies. We hypothesized that an antibiotic has only a short-term effect on the uterine microbiome and does not change the progression of disease from metritis to endometritis. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of systemic antibiotic given to cows diagnosed with metritis and healthy cows early postpartum on the development of endometritis and the uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum. Cows diagnosed with metritis were compared to healthy ones in a 2 × 2 factorial design, where they were either treated with an antibiotic (ceftiofur hydrochloride) at 7 to 10 days postpartum or left untreated. Cows were slaughtered at one month postpartum and the uterus was assessed for endometritis (presence of purulent material in the uterine lumen and inflammation in the endometrium) and uterine samples were collected for bacteriology and metagenomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing). As expected, the uterine microbiome at disease diagnosis had dysbiosis of typical metritis pathogens (e.g., Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas) in diseased compared with healthy cows. At one month postpartum, there was a tendency for more endometritis in metritis cows compared with healthy but antibiotic treatment had no effect on endometritis prevalence regardless of the original disease diagnosis. Likewise, when bacteria were cultured or sequenced, there were a greater number of species (culture) or amplicon sequence variants (ASV; sequencing) in the uterine lumen of cows with metritis. However, antibiotic treatment had no effect on the prevalence of cultured species or the composition of the detected ASV. The uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum was associated with the clinical observation of the uterus (endometritis or healthy). Early postpartum antibiotic treatment only provides temporary resolution of uterine dysbiosis that is not sustained long-term. Failure to resolve the dysbiosis is associated with a greater prevalence of endometritis in cows with metritis, and the occurrence of endometritis significantly impacts fertility later postpartum.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Postpartum uterine disease (metritis) is common in dairy cows. The disease develops within 1 week after calving and is associated with microbial dysbiosis, fever, and fetid uterine discharge. Cows with metritis have a greater likelihood of developing endometritis and infertility later postpartum. Antibiotic treatment is used to relieve symptoms of metritis but the capacity of antibiotic treatment to improve fertility later postpartum is inconsistent across published studies. We hypothesized that an antibiotic has only a short-term effect on the uterine microbiome and does not change the progression of disease from metritis to endometritis. To test this hypothesis, we studied the effects of systemic antibiotic given to cows diagnosed with metritis and healthy cows early postpartum on the development of endometritis and the uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum.
Results UNASSIGNED
Cows diagnosed with metritis were compared to healthy ones in a 2 × 2 factorial design, where they were either treated with an antibiotic (ceftiofur hydrochloride) at 7 to 10 days postpartum or left untreated. Cows were slaughtered at one month postpartum and the uterus was assessed for endometritis (presence of purulent material in the uterine lumen and inflammation in the endometrium) and uterine samples were collected for bacteriology and metagenomics (16S rRNA gene sequencing). As expected, the uterine microbiome at disease diagnosis had dysbiosis of typical metritis pathogens (e.g., Fusobacterium, Bacteroides, and Porphyromonas) in diseased compared with healthy cows. At one month postpartum, there was a tendency for more endometritis in metritis cows compared with healthy but antibiotic treatment had no effect on endometritis prevalence regardless of the original disease diagnosis. Likewise, when bacteria were cultured or sequenced, there were a greater number of species (culture) or amplicon sequence variants (ASV; sequencing) in the uterine lumen of cows with metritis. However, antibiotic treatment had no effect on the prevalence of cultured species or the composition of the detected ASV. The uterine microbiome at 1 month postpartum was associated with the clinical observation of the uterus (endometritis or healthy).
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Early postpartum antibiotic treatment only provides temporary resolution of uterine dysbiosis that is not sustained long-term. Failure to resolve the dysbiosis is associated with a greater prevalence of endometritis in cows with metritis, and the occurrence of endometritis significantly impacts fertility later postpartum.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38659779
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4233045/v1
pmc: PMC11042388
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : R01 HD092254
Pays : United States

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. Additional Declarations: No competing interests reported.

Références

Reprod Biol. 2016 Mar;16(1):1-7
pubmed: 26952747
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Sep;81(9):2502-9
pubmed: 9785242
Gigascience. 2012 Jul 12;1(1):7
pubmed: 23587224
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Feb;92(2):621-5
pubmed: 19164673
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Mar;107(3):1630-1644
pubmed: 37820756
Gigascience. 2013 Nov 26;2(1):16
pubmed: 24280061
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(21):7188-96
pubmed: 17947321
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2020 Jun;2(2):lqaa023
pubmed: 32391521
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Apr;105(4):3440-3452
pubmed: 35151476
Nat Biotechnol. 2019 Aug;37(8):852-857
pubmed: 31341288
Nat Commun. 2019 Jun 20;10(1):2719
pubmed: 31222023
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Feb;104(2):2056-2073
pubmed: 33309374
Biotechniques. 2004 May;36(5):808-12
pubmed: 15152600
Nat Methods. 2016 Jul;13(7):581-3
pubmed: 27214047
Theriogenology. 2018 Oct 1;119:225-232
pubmed: 30055393
Anim Microbiome. 2021 Jan 28;3(1):15
pubmed: 33509303
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Aug;104(8):8918-8930
pubmed: 33934874
J Anim Sci. 2015 May;93(5):2021-33
pubmed: 26020298
Theriogenology. 2017 May;94:21-30
pubmed: 28407857
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Dec;81(12):3172-81
pubmed: 9891264
J Dairy Sci. 2017 May;100(5):3783-3795
pubmed: 28365115
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep;81(18):6324-32
pubmed: 26150453
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Genomics Inform. 2018 Dec;16(4):e21
pubmed: 30602082
mSystems. 2021 Mar 16;6(2):
pubmed: 33727399
J Dairy Sci. 2023 Apr;106(4):2846-2856
pubmed: 36870842
J Anim Sci. 2013 Sep;91(9):4158-67
pubmed: 23825331
Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015 May 29;26:27663
pubmed: 26028277
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2004 May 15;224(10):1634-9
pubmed: 15154734
Animal. 2023 May;17 Suppl 1:100781
pubmed: 37567665
J Dairy Sci. 2002 Sep;85(9):2223-36
pubmed: 12362455
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Aug;95(8):4363-71
pubmed: 22818449
Animal. 2020 Mar;14(S1):s44-s54
pubmed: 32024567
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Nov;97(11):6649-61
pubmed: 25218751
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7345-7358
pubmed: 31178192
Can J Vet Res. 1992 Oct;56(4):318-25
pubmed: 1477801
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Mar;104(3):3158-3168
pubmed: 33455790
Theriogenology. 2020 Jul 1;150:158-165
pubmed: 31973964
Microbiome. 2018 May 17;6(1):90
pubmed: 29773078
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 07;7:484
pubmed: 27092134
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(5):1576-85
pubmed: 17220268
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Dec;104(12):12816-12829
pubmed: 34482979
Cell Host Microbe. 2017 Jan 11;21(1):7-10
pubmed: 28081445

Auteurs

Joao Gabriel Nascimento Moraes (JGN)

Oklahoma State University.

Tamara B Gull (TB)

University of Missouri.

Aaron C Ericsson (AC)

University of Missouri.

Monica O Caldeira (MO)

University of Missouri.

Tim J Evans (TJ)

University of Missouri.

Scott E Poock (SE)

University of Missouri.

Matthew C Lucy (MC)

University of Missouri.

Classifications MeSH