A systematic literature review of hate speech identification on Arabic Twitter data: research challenges and future directions.
Arabic tweets
Automatic identification
Classification techniques
Hate speech
Natural language processing
SLR
Journal
PeerJ. Computer science
ISSN: 2376-5992
Titre abrégé: PeerJ Comput Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101660598
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
received:
28
07
2023
accepted:
06
03
2024
medline:
25
4
2024
pubmed:
25
4
2024
entrez:
25
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The automatic speech identification in Arabic tweets has generated substantial attention among academics in the fields of text mining and natural language processing (NLP). The quantity of studies done on this subject has experienced significant growth. This study aims to provide an overview of this field by conducting a systematic review of literature that focuses on automatic hate speech identification, particularly in the Arabic language. The goal is to examine the research trends in Arabic hate speech identification and offer guidance to researchers by highlighting the most significant studies published between 2018 and 2023. This systematic study addresses five specific research questions concerning the types of the Arabic language used, hate speech categories, classification techniques, feature engineering techniques, performance metrics, validation methods, existing challenges faced by researchers, and potential future research directions. Through a comprehensive search across nine academic databases, 24 studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria and quality assessment were identified. The review findings revealed the existence of many Arabic linguistic varieties used in hate speech on Twitter, with modern standard Arabic (MSA) being the most prominent. In identification techniques, machine learning categories are the most used technique for Arabic hate speech identification. The result also shows different feature engineering techniques used and indicates that N-gram and CBOW are the most used techniques. F1-score, precision, recall, and accuracy were also identified as the most used performance metric. The review also shows that the most used validation method is the train/test split method. Therefore, the findings of this study can serve as valuable guidance for researchers in enhancing the efficacy of their models in future investigations. Besides, algorithm development, policy rule regulation, community management, and legal and ethical consideration are other real-world applications that can be reaped from this research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38660217
doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1966
pii: cs-1966
pmc: PMC11041964
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e1966Informations de copyright
© 2024 Alhazmi et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.